Mankind at crossroads: the world toward the New World Order or toward the liberation and restoration of the Christian faith?

The question that many people are asking themselves in these weeks is: how did we get to this point?

In other words, how was it possible for mankind to reduce itself to a crowd of inhuman zombies who have no other thought than to place a useless and harmful face mask on their faces? (ER: and then rush to take an experimental gene therapy they believe will rid them of a low-grade virus?)

It didn’t happen in one day, and it wasn’t even the exclusive result of the massive terrorist operation which the media, owned by the international finance and big corporations, has been running from a year ago.

To get to this point, a long, slow, necessary, and inexorable process of demoralization necessarily took place that has led mankind to the lowest condition in its history.

By demoralization, a complete lack of values is meant to give birth to a condition where evil is on the same level ground as good is.

It can be said that never has a historical period existed like this where people are so stupid and devoid of thought as they are now.

The Covid terrorist operation was successful because the masses have lost any sense of moral value.

This crisis has been accurately prepared and planned; as was the real goal that is behind it.

The Covid crisis fits all the characteristics of the catalyzing event that the most influential globalist circles have been seeking for decades.

The final goal is none other than the absolute rule of the world through the creation of a totalitarianism much more oppressive and fierce than the ones of the past century.

If one thinks that history is just the result of mere causality and that the powers that rule this world have no strategy in their actions, then he would likely not understand what is going on now.

If one chooses this vision, he resigns and constrains himself to a world of labels through which the system isolates those who are still gifted of free thought.

The system likes to label “conspiracy theorists” or “flat earthers” all those who understand pretty well that there is no such thing as a “health emergency”. The only way the globalist system can survive is to ban the minds who are still able to think independently from what the media propagandizes.

The media, as clearly explained by the sociologist Marshall McLuhan, no longer performs the function to inform the masses.

Instead, the media is the tool that the Power utilizes to program the masses. In other words, the media is no other than a war (mental) machine that has the purpose to tell people what they are supposed to think or not.

Since the beginning of humanity’s existence, we have (for good or bad) been programmed in every single aspect of our daily lives.

Societal institutions have, from a long time ago, lost their primary function to educate and prepare the masses for life. Instead, their goal now is not to nurture people’s critical thinking, but to suppress in every way those who are still able to question the dominant narrative, having understood its huge fallacy.

In order to continue to exist, the globalist ideology needs to create people who don’t think and who only repeat what the agents of the system tell them to say. The agents of the system can be propagandist teachers or the journalists who are only mouth speakers of the international finance and big corporations, both which are the real owners of the press.

At this point, the most natural question would be to ask about the final purpose of this new totalitarianism.

What kind of society does this system want?

The final goal was revealed by the system itself on several occasions, and it is to bring about a one-world government, ruled by a tiny élite belonging to the most exclusive circles of globalism, such as the Club of Rome, the Bilderberg Club, and the Council of Foreign Relations, just to mention a few.

These circles would form the power structure that would rule the world. For decades, they have been working unstoppably to reach this goal, which is the complete removal of nations and their historical and religious values from the face of the Earth.

In this globalist ideal, from the ashes of nations should arise a universal Leviathan dominated by a global tyrant who will persecute all those who will dare to oppose and resist him.

The élites themselves revealed their plans decades ago, but the masses have never seriously considered their intentions.

In 1950, the powerful banker James Warburg (tied to the Rothschilds, the most important family at the top of the globalist power scheme), stated before the US Senate that one day a world government would become a reality.

For Warburg, it wasn’t a matter of if but only how this goal would be achieved, through the general consensus of the masses brought about through force.

Considering the present situation, one would pick the former option. Right now, people of the world (except in rare cases) are not opposing this world dictatorship plan. On the contrary, they are quietly accepting it and, in the worst case, they are enthusiastically clapping to their own and their neighbor’s demise. They are also ready to curse those still gifted of humanity and intelligence and those who don’t want to accept to be destroyed because the regime has ordered them to.

Demoralization paved the way to the global totalitarianism

This situation was not the result of causality, as was mentioned before. To drag mankind to this state of moral darkening, it was necessary to enforce a demoralization program during these past decades, as it was prophetically explained by the former KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov in 1984.

If a person is devoid of any moral value, he will not be able to separate good from evil and he will be ready to accept anything.

Simply put, if a man ignores good, he will not even present himself with the conundrum to commit evil; because in his eyes, there exists no substantial difference between the former and the latter.

This is the explanation of what is happening in these days. People refuse to either want or to see the truth because they don’t even consider the possibility that there can be evil and lies in the message of the system.

They accept it without any moral scruples, and once they receive the order, even the most inhuman and foolish one will execute it without question.

Freethinking is banned in the world government. But above all, to reach actual demoralization, it will be necessary to eradicate from society its institutions that define the morality of a people, which is religion. In the Western part of the world (especially Italy), it is certainly the Christian religion. De-Christianization is causing the extinction of the Western civilization.

Freemasonry has espoused this goal, and for more than a century, it has systematically planned the infiltration of the Catholic Church. Archbishop Viganò explained that, in this regard Vatican II has had a fundamental role in the acceleration of these plans to usher in the New World Order.

Since the Church opened itself to the world and rejected its secular tradition, the moral decline of Italy, Europe and the world was virtually unstoppable.

The mission of the Church was to resist secularization and laicism, not to become its spokesperson.

Therefore, the current anti-Catholic Church of Bergoglio is nothing other than the natural consequence of this infiltration process.

Society is sick because the Church is sick. The health of the latter affects the former, and the stronger and more resistant the Church is, the weaker and less influential is the power of Freemasonry. Therefore, there is an inversely proportional relation between the Church and Freemasonry.

However, it is indubitable that this world government has a political and particular spiritual nature.

The ideological roots of Freemasonry are the mystery religions, which are founded upon the cult of Lucifer.

The Freemasons who have left this organization have revealed and testified to the world the truth about the religion of Freemasonry, which is shared only with the highest ranks of the lodges, especially the 33^rd degree. (ER: it is rumoured that 33rd degree is the highest rank only to the public view.) 

Even those who haven’t left Freemasonry and those who had been the most influential masons in history explained the real nature of this sect in their writings.

Albert Pike (33^rd degree Grand Master of the US Southern jurisdiction lodge) communicated in his letter to Giuseppe Mazzini (an important Italian Freemason), that the final purpose of Freemasonry was to drag mankind towards a global tyranny founded upon the satanic religion.

Therefore, the destruction of Christianity and the Church is simply vital for Freemasonry to get to its goal.

The world government cannot arise if the hierarchy of anti-Christian values does not replace the Christian values.

If one denies the spiritual root of history and the one of the actual historic period, he fails to understand what is really happening now. He would also be restrained to the materialist vision of history, which cannot explain this age because it denies the supernatural vision.

Let us go back to the crisis at hand. The Covid crisis is surely an instrument to inflate the profits of the big pharmaceutical cartels, but this is not the main goal.

And the most practical example comes from the Covid vaccine rollout itself. Scientist and former Pfizer Vice-President Michael Yeadon clearly pointed out that profit is not the program goal of vaccine distribution.

The pharmaceutical cartel could make more money by increasing the costs of production of each dose.  Therefore, the true goal, as Dr. Yeadon said, is a massive depopulation operation.

The Covid mRNA vaccine rollout is already causing some serious adverse reactions on the population and it will also lead to an inevitable reduction of the fertility rates.

The élites want to reduce the world population because their idea is strictly neo-Malthusian. The neo-Malthusian ideology was mainly spread in the early 70s behind the hypocritical façade of environmental protection. Environmentalism had another purpose, which is to convey the idea that in order to protect nature, man’s population must be reduced on Earth.

In other words, this ideology wants to kill mankind and it is certainly not by chance that the globalist circles promoted this idea so much.

The Covid terrorist operation was conceived to get to this goal and after that, those who survive will have no other option than to accept the new totalitarian society – a society where there will be no more jobs, replaced by the universal basic income that will be given out only to those who will receive vaccines and accept the Mark of the Beast.

The recent pandemic treaty signed by 23 world leaders goes exactly in this direction by progressively eroding the residual power of sovereign national governments, to be replaced by the future global superstate.

The world towards global government or the liberation of mankind?

And it is not a hazard to say that never in the history of the world has this idea been so close to becoming a reality.

However, if one takes into consideration the Christian perspective to analyze events, he must try to better understand this vision.

The social sciences of economy, sociology, and geopolitics certainly are useful for understanding this present reality, but each one of these fails to fully comprehend the ideology and the nature of global totalitarianism.

If one has recourse to Christian ideology, then everything that is nonsensical suddenly seems to make sense. The real purpose of this plan is to destroy God’s creation, mankind, and to have us suffer the worst possible scenarios.

The world is now in a state of great chaos and turmoil, and as some believe apparently very close to the End Times. It is necessary to wonder if mankind is at a point in history where the global tyrant should manifest himself to the world.

To this, there are several spiritual and geopolitical reasons to believe that this is not the case and that the world is not still close to the precipice.

The reasons that belong to the spiritual realm suggest that the world in this moment is in the fifth of the Seven Ages of the Church. This classification of religious history was made for the first time by the German Venerable Bartholomew Holzhauser, who also wrote some excellent commentaries about the Apocalypse.

Holzhauser divided the history of the world into seven great ages, the first age being the birth of Christ, with the seventh age – the end – commencing with the coming of the Antichrist.

According to several interpretations of this prophecy, amongst them, Bishop Williamson’s, the world now should be in the fifth age. This age is one of great moral dissolution and spiritual decay in which people give in to apostasies and are very far away from the faith.

Moreover, chaos rules and major turmoil will affect nations in several parts of the world.

Holzhauser’s Fifth Age shares some significant resemblance with the present epoch, where mankind appears to be touching its lowest point in history. People now only listen to the false word of the scientist shamans.

However, this period should end soon and the general apostasy should come to an end.

Once this amoral period expires, the Church should come to its greatness guided by a leader known in the prophecies as the “Holy Pope”.

Several scholars think that this figure is none other than Archbishop Viganò, who in this moment is certainly the spiritual leader in the battle against the false Church that has turned into an agent of Freemasonry and one-world religion.

However, other material elements suggest also that the time of the world government has not yet arrived, because not all the major world powers are in the hands of the New World Order.

To further explore this, let us go now to Count Kalergi, Freemason and ideological father of the European Union. Kalergi was an Austrian Freemason and an important intellectual financed by the Rothschilds and the Warburgs. In the 1920’s, he proposed that for the world government to be successful, it would need the participation of the US, of a United Europe (the United States of Europe), of Great Britain, and the then USSR.

The division of the world, according to Kalergi

Only the participation of these major geopolitical blocs (along with other geopolitical blocs) would allow for the birth of a one-world government. Freemason Winston Churchill also arrived at the same conclusions in 1950.

In this historic moment, the big globalist power has certainly the absolute control of the EU, where the the anti-Christian infection is quite deep, of Great Britain and Communist China, but they still do not have the control of Russia and the US.

The US seems to be suspended in a sort of limbo. The Biden-Harris administration appears to be a puppet administration that might not last for long. There is a hypothesis that after January 20, Trump temporarily stepped aside to deliver power to the armed forces. This move could have been done to buy some more time to overturn the 2020 electoral fraud and return to power, but way before 2024.

The latest statements of Mike Lindell and the news from Arizona, where a forensic audit on the ballots will be performed, seem to suggest that this eventuality is becoming more likely.

It is worth noting that recently, the Biden-Harris administration failed to sign the pandemic treaty, which is the foundation of the world government.

In any case, there will be no world government without the participation of the US. This is the reason why globalism has been seeking to reconquer the control of America.

They are perfectly aware that without the US superpower, there is no way to get to this goal.

On the other side of the planet, there is Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin. Before the arrival of Trump, Putin’s Russia was a real dam against the advancement of the totalitarian project.

In his recent Davos Forum speech, Putin proclaimed that the time of the global unilateral vision was coming to an end and that the world will not go towards the Great Reset.

With this in mind, globalism is desperately trying to accelerate towards this final goal, but it has failed to take with it the two world superpowers, which should be the architrave of the world dictatorship.

The window of opportunity is rapidly closing and the weak EU cannot certainly lead the world towards the world superstate.

Bill Gates recently spoke in an interview and said that more time is needed to get to the Great Reset.

The end of the fake pandemic was postponed to 2022, and if one looks at the schedule published by several government whistleblowers last year, it appears that things are not going exactly as planned.

The élites planned to take over America in 2021, but in Washington, there is a puppet administration.

Therefore, in this scenario, it seems possible to see some fortuitous developments that may suggest that in this present age, the Rothschilds’ plans will not be successful. In any case, it is important to remember that it will not be easy at all.

The world is deemed to face major turmoils even if the globalist plans fail.

Only those who endure to the end will make it. Above all, only those who can catch the spiritual side of this battle will arrive to the finish line.

The Easter of Resurrection has just passed, and this could be also the omen for a Resurrection of Christ’s forces on Earth who are resisting this evil.

In any case, evil will not win. Non praevalebunt.

Anthony Migchels: “Henry, something big happened last week: the IMF is going to give out loans in SDR. Special Drawing Rights are their currency. By itself, they’re nothing special, but the IMF has always lent in Dollars.
That they are going to print their own currency on a large scale, $650 billion to begin with, is simply monumental. It means that World Currency is starting.
This is EXACTLY what Mark Carney (BoE chief) announced 18 months ago. That the Petrodollar would end ‘in ten years’, and would be replaced with an IMF World Reserve Currency. I reported on it here. There’s Going to be a Gold Standard & It Will Be Disastrous.”“Make no mistake: if there’s a World Central Bank, and a World Reserve Currency, open World Government is not far away.”

Eighteen months after Mark Carney officially announced the end of the Petrodollar, and its replacement by an IMF World Reserve Currency, the IMF announces that they will create $650 billion worth of Special Drawing Rights.

It’s an astounding event. The IMF ceases lending in dollars, and starts using its own currency to bail out nations. Ninety have asked for ‘assistance’, their finances savaged by the lockdown.

$650 billion may not sound like much but this is only the beginning. Soon the IMF will be throwing around trillions worth of SDR like the Fed now is doing with USD.

The idea is that the IMF currency can be used as reserve currency. And they will, the Petrodollar is inflating badly, and has lost perhaps as much as half of its value in real terms over the last 18 months or so. The Euro and the Yen are also in bad shape, hiding the true extent of the dollar’s decline. Nobody is going to be happy to see their reserves (or savings) melt away.

This may sound either bizarre, or even hardly relevant, but it is. Everybody is bamboozled by the Lockdown and the ‘virus’, but in the background a huge financial crisis has been ongoing. Let’s recapitulate the key events over the last few years, that led to this crunch moment in World History.

0. The foreplay was the Fed starting tapering in 2017. Presumably trying to take some of the liquidity they had injected during the 2008 Crunch out of the System. And raising rates. This had the entirely predictable, and indeed widely predicted, effect of creating a major liquidity squeeze in the System.

Here’s the trend of M2 growth, a key money supply measure.

As is clearly visible, the Fed’s tapering simply caused a deflationary crash, just as they did in 2008, and 2001. Money growth went to zero; it needs to grow about 10% per year to keep the System sufficiently liquid. 

Basically to keep the Usury on the debt payable, that is what is driving money growth. There is never enough money to pay interest + debt.

HISTORY LESSON

1. But the story of the death of the Petrodollar and the rise of the IMF World Reserve Currency starts in earnest in August 23 2019, when Mark Carney, Bank of England chief at the time, in a meeting with colleague central bankers, announced that ‘within ten years’, the Dollar’s role as World Reserve Currency would end, and that it would be replaced not by the Yuan, but an IMF World Reserve Currency. He added that a change of reserve currency is typically associated with ‘dramatic upheavals’.

2. Then, not a month later, on Monday September 16th 2019, problems started mounting on the repo market, where Banks and other ‘institutions’ go for daily short term loans to balance their books. It went as high as 10%. This indicated that players in the shadow banking system didn’t trust each others’ collateral anymore. They effectively stopped lending to each other. One may remember the Libor rate in 2008, which went up, indicating the same problems. This means these ‘institutions’ were technically bankrupt.

3. This then, was the excuse for the Fed to start QE 4. At first, they said they would start a) buying up treasuries, and b) provide ‘short term loans’ on a daily basis to insolvent ‘institutions’.

It started with about $75 billion per day, which nowadays is small beer, but things escalated quickly. On January 3d 2020, the day Soleimani was executed, the Fed reported that they had already doled out $6 Trillion in day to day-loans.

4. Things worsened only from there. When the World Wide Lockdown started, March 16th 2020, the Fed was already providing a cool $1 Trillion per day in loans to the shadow banking system. That fateful day, when 4 billion people were given house arrest, they started a $4 Trillion ‘asset purchasing program’, basically allowing the bankrupt ‘institutions’ (it’s very sad Newspeak to call these plunder operations ‘institutions’) to off load their junk to the Fed, in a bid to ‘solve’ the problems on the repo market.

Yes, we got locked up as they gave $4 Trillion to the Bank, that’s literally what happened. It was all sold as ‘panic due to Corona’, but the real ‘panic’ (in reality, it’s all orchestrated A to Z) was on Wall Street.

5. Several ‘packages have come through Congress since that bailout. Mnuchin gave Wall Street another Trillion. Biden has just signed a $3 Trillion deal, most of which goes directly to the filthy rich too. All in all, the Fed and the US Government have added $12 Trillion in new dollars to the System since September 2019.

6. As a result of this inflation the obvious is happening: rising prices. Especially in commodities. Everything is up 50% or more, lumber 180%. It will take a little time for these prices to translate in rising prices of all goods, but they will.

There’s also massive housing speculation. In Vancouver, Australia. Much of it is driven by China, which has expanded credit with an even greater amount than the Fed over the last few years. Some say as much $30 Trillion.

7. Much of the inflation goes to the Stock Exchange, resulting in the ridiculous ‘boom’ there, which is 100% totally artificial, and would not exist without the Fed.

Between September and December 2019, the S&P went down from 2905 to 2416. This must have been because of the disastrous liquidity squeeze in the shadow banking system that became apparent with that 10% repo market interest rate spike.

Then, because of QE, it started climbing like crazy again, all the way up to 3380. Next, it lost a full 1000 points in the week after the Lockdown started. Presumably because of ‘covid’, but it had nothing to do with that, it was the same problems in the financial system, for which they were providing already a Trillion per day on the repo market, and for which they conjured up that $ 4 Trillion bailout.

Since then, the S&P has risen to 4019 today. Another 600 point rise while the real economy is in shambles due to the Lockdown.

8. The result of all this is obvious: it has killed the Dollar. Just as ‘economist’/bankster agent Kyle Bass said they would do to ‘fix’ America’s finances back in 2011. Both its value, and its status. De-dollarization is ongoing and has been escalating. The already crumbling Petrodollar is not going to recover from this.

The IMF’s move confirms this: the new loans are in their SDRs, not in the usual Dollars. Washington’s dominance in the IMF is officially over. From now on, the IMF itself dominates.

BONDS

The latest news is that bond markets are now starting to show rising yields. Interest rates are rising. Those holding Treasuries are going to take a huge hit with high inflation, and they’re, belatedly, waking up to that fact. Rising yields are the natural result, but of course higher interest rates are crushing for debtors. That is the unsolvable (within the usurious financial paradigm) crucifix that the People are nailed upon: either inflation, or deflation. Or better, first inflation, then deflation. Classic boom bust creation by the Bankers, they’ve been doing this throughout Modernity.

Just last week, March 31st, the Fed, in a shock announcement, said they would not prolong a ‘short term’ measure they installed last year ‘to calm markets’, which involved looser demands for capital reserves for ‘financial institutions’. De facto this means Banks and hedge funds must hold higher capital reserves. And this definitely has tightening effects on money. In fact: it likely has serious consequences for lots of ‘distressed’ outfits on Wall Street, including the Mega Banks themselves. Remember, they wouldn’t lend each other just months ago, and they’re still all out on a limb, relying on eternal, and ever higher bailouts by the Fed.

It can’t be much of a coincidence, that immediately a major hedge fund, Archegos, collapsed.

It remains to be seen how far the Fed is willing to take this, but all bets are off. They’re capable of anything. They’re clearly on the war path, and destroying what’s left of American Hegemony, so it’s far from unlikely that they could be out for some serious blood.

If we have indeed witnessed the end of the Fed’s expansion, major defaults seem all but unavoidable. They simply can’t bail them all out all the time, even if they would want to.

CONCLUSION

This is it. What we’ve been discussing for two decades or more in the Alternative Media is now coming to pass.

The Petrodollar is officially over, and the IMF is creating their own World Reserve Currency, the Special Drawing Rights. They are no longer lending in Dollar, but in their own money.
Washington no longer dominates the IMF, the IMF is now the morphing into the official World Central Bank.

Officially owned by all the Nations, but in reality owning all of them.

And let there be no mistake: if there’s a World Central Bank, and a World Reserve Currency, open World Government is not far away.

An ‘authoritative’ Ipsos Mori poll done in the UK, reported on by Paul Joseph Watson below, shows that an allegedly high percentage of Brits support mandatory vaccination passports. This from Watson’s report Clear Majority Of Brits Support “Vaccine Passports” To Go To The Pub, Poll Finds:

Yet another poll has shown that a clear majority of Brits support mandatory ‘vaccine passports’ in order to be able to go to the pub, use public transport or even have a haircut.

A poll undertaken by Ipsos Mori asked respondents, “To what extent would you support or oppose the introduction of a vaccine passport?”

62% said they would support it to visit pubs or restaurants, while only 22% opposed the idea.

An even higher figure, 78% said they would mandate the vaccine passport for international travel, while 61% said it should be required to attend sports games and 58% said it should be mandated for public transport.

Another clear majority, 56% to 24%, even say that you should need to present proof of vaccination before being allowed to get a haircut.

Doubt was being expressed on Twitter about this finding. And with good cause. Here is Dr. Naomi Wolf’s response (Tweet) with the report below:

********

Ipsos Mori received $3,250,953 from Gates Foundation and CEO involved with World Economic Forum

DAVID CLEWS

Yesterday, the media agenda and social media was ablaze with the narrative that the majority of the people in the UK back so-called ‘vaxx-passports’. In the following article we will break down and explain the way in which this information is first presented and pro-Government news outlets push the agenda despite concerns around methodology. Then we will look at the extensive links between Ipsos Mori, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and The Davos Agenda allowing you to decide whether or not you believe this is all that it seems.

The following was published on the Ipsos Mori website in a blaze of publicity:

Majority of Britons support vaccine passports but recognise concerns in new Ipsos MORI UK KnowledgePanel poll

New survey shows significant support for vaccine passports however, some are concerned about the potential issues they could cause31 March 2021

A new Ipsos MORI UK KnowledgePanel poll has found the public support using ‘vaccine passports’ across a range of circumstances. There is particularly strong support for their use for people who are travelling abroad (78%), for visiting relatives in hospitals (74%) or care homes (78%). Seven in ten say they should be needed to go to the theatre or an indoor concert (68%), while six in ten support needing one to go to the pub or eat out in a restaurant (62%), or to go to the gym (63%).

Britons also want to see vaccine passorts being a requirement for certain jobs. For example, eight in ten say that they should be required to work on the frontline in the NHS or care sector (79%), seven in ten say the same about teaching (69%), and two thirds think they should be needed to work as a tradesperson in people’s homes (66%), in a restaurant or pub (65%), or in a supermarket (63%).

While Britons recognise some of the ethical or legal issues surrounding vaccine passports, six in ten think the potential benefits to the economy outweigh any concerns (62%). Vaccine passports are seen as critical to getting businesses open (60%), and a good alternative to lockdowns (61%). They are also seen as a useful means of encouraging people to get vaccinated (61%). Britons also suggest they may ‘vote with their feet’; for example, 65% say they would be more likely to buy a ticket for a large public event if they knew that vaccine passports were in use there, and 59% say they would be more likely to employ a plumber with a vaccine passport than one who had not been vaccinated.

However, there are some notes of caution in the findings. One in five think the ethical and legal concerns outweigh any potential benefits to the economy (22%), and half say that vaccine passports may lead to inequalities (52% agree that they will lead to an unequal society by restricting what people who haven’t received the vaccine can do).

There are also important differences by age, ethnicity and deprivation. For example, younger people, ethnic minority Britons, and those in more deprived areas express more concern about the legal and ethical issues, and are less likely to support their use. These groups have seen the lowest levels of vaccine confidence.

Kelly Beaver, Managing Director of Public Affairs at Ipsos MORI said:

Our UK KnowledgePanel findings show that the public are once again prepared to do what it takes to get out of this pandemic. While they recognise the issues around vaccine passports, particularly their potential to exacerbate existing inequalities, their potential importance to ending lockdown and reopening the economy has won the argument for the majority of the British public.

What then happened was that the mainstream media seized upon this as evidence of ‘massive’ support for vaccine passports as you can see below by the Sun’s political editor Harry Cole:

Are the British Public aware that over a number of years Cole has been intimately involved with the Conservative Party and was the former boyfriend of Carrie Symonds?

According to Wikipedia: He was Vice-Chairman/Treasurer of the Edinburgh University Conservative Association^[5] and Vice-President of Scottish Conservative Future. Cole wrote the ToryBear blog, focusing on Conservative student politics.^[6]

A number of other Government linked media channels and ‘journalists’ then ran this hard in what we see as an attempt to skew public opinion on this.

Former Brexit Party MEP & respected media commentator Martin Daubney then questioned the entire methodology behind the polling:

This then leads us on to the company itself behind the poll, Ipsos Mori, which is a global polling company engaging in a number of services to governments, businesses and organisations throughout the world. Over the last few years, more and more people have been questioning the links between organisations promoting certain agendas and the mainstream media and very specifically polling companies.

UNN can now reveal that Ipsos Mori has received grants totalling $3,250,953 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The unelected Bill Gates has been at the forefront of the media campaign over Covid19 with many questioning as to why this is. Many have opined that it is due to his foundation’s largesse in supporting organisations such as the embattled W.H.O and directing funding to media organisations. The most recent grant from the Gates Foundation was in order “To analyze how communities can be better activated and supported to address their own risks in epidemic situations.”

Now some might argue the Gates Foundation is philanthropic and does a great job, but others might say this is not the case and even then many people are concerned at its reach and influence based on the use of money.

This is not the only link Ipsos Mori has with many of those as part of the Global Agenda. The World Economic Forum (WEF) established by Klaus Schwab has promoted what is known as ‘the Great Reset’ where in one video they boldly stated that by 2030 ‘you will own nothing and be happy’. We can now reveal that Ben Page, CEO of Ipsos Mori,  recently appeared at the Davos conference to discuss issues around ‘vaccine confidence’. When you do a search of his name and ‘Davos’ it comes under people but we are unable to confirm if he is a member of the WEF.

Please see below Page’s appearance on the Davos Digital

UNN has written the following question to Ipsos Mori and we await their response which will be published when received:

Hello there, we are writing an article on Ipsos Mori’s recent poll on so-called ‘vaxx passports’ in the UK. We are writing to ask what re-assurances you can give to the wider British Public on the accuracy of this poll. We also note that Ipsos Mori London has received $3,250,953 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and your CEO Ben Page, who presented this poll, is a member of the World Economic Forum. Both these organisations have been effusive in their praise of ‘Vaxx Passports’ and many of our readers are interested to know if this doesn’t represent a conflict of interest? We appreciate your comment on this matter.

So here we get an insight into how I would say modern propaganda works. A poll is published based on questionable data that is then seized upon by Government supporting journalists and news outlets to push a narrative. The wider public, who are not fortunate like you, remain blissfully unaware that the company behind the poll and the journalists pushing the narrative are linked to those behind the agenda.

Ipsos Mori has received money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation while its CEO is speaking at the World Economic Forum. With YouGov, being founded by current Vaccine Minister Nadim Zahawi, also producing polls very much in favour of the narrative, it begs the question can these people and organisations be trusted to be objective and fair?

Understanding Anti-Putin PSYOPs: Preparing for War

Intro: cause vs pretext

It is not an exaggeration to say that in the mythology of the AngloZionist Empire, Putin is something akin to Satan or, at least, that he is a kind of “Sauron” who is the epitome of evil. And, we all heard that recently, Biden, in a recorded interview, declared that Putin is “a killer”. When given a chance to soften this statement, Jen Psaki did no such thing. We can, therefore, conclude that this was an official, deliberately planned, characterization of the Russian leader.

This kind of language was never used by western officials during the Cold War, at least not on the top levels. So why this seething hatred for Putin?

It is not because he is ex-GPU KGB SSSR. Yuri Andropov was a former KGB Chairman, and he did a lot to strengthen the KGB, its personnel and operations. Yet nobody called him a killer. Neither is this because of Crimea or the Donbass, at least not directly, because when the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia and, before that, Hungary, western politicians did not call Khrushchev or Brezhnev “killers”. It is not because of the shooting down of MH-17 (western leaders all know that these are lies created by western special services), because there have been quite a few civilian airliners shot down by various states, but that did not result in the kind of total demonization of the leaders of these states. I could go on and on, but you get the point: even if we carefully parse all the accusations against Putin, we find out that the kind of total demonization he has been the subject of is quite unique in its intensity and scope.

There is a huge difference between the concepts of “cause” and “pretext”, and all the examples I have given are nothing but pretexts. We need to look at the real causes of such a blind hatred for Putin.

Here we come across another list of possible reasons: first, it is undeniable that while Yeltsin almost destroyed Russia as a country, Putin single-handedly “resurrected” Russia in an amazingly short time. From a country which was in tatters and a population which wanted nothing more than to become the next Germany or, failing that, at least the next Poland, Putin turned Russia into the strongest military power on the planet and he completely reshaped the Russian perception of themselves and of Russia. Not only that, but Putin used every single move by the West (like, say, sanctions, boycotts or threats) to further strengthen Russia (by means such as import substitutions, international conferences and military maneuvers). Most importantly, Putin de-coupled Russia from a lot of US controlled institutions or mechanisms, a move which also immensely served Russia.

US politicians spoke of a country with an “economy in tatters” and of a “gas station masquerading as a country”. But in the real world (Zone B), the Russian economy did much better than the western ones, and as for the “energy war” between the US, the KSA and Russia, it ended in a catastrophic defeat for the USA and a triumph for Russia and, to a lesser degree, the KSA.

Then came COVID and the truly epic disaster of the West’s total mismanagement of this crisis. Not only that, but the contrast of how Russia (and China!) handled the crisis and what the West did could not have been bigger. As for Russia being the first country to create a vaccine (by now, no less than three of them actually; now Russia is about to release yet another vaccine, this time protecting animals from COVID) and, worse, the country which created the best vaccine on the planet – this is a PR disaster for the West and there is nothing the West can do to soften the blow. If anything, things are only getting worse as shown by all the coming lockdowns in Europe – contrast that with this photo of happy Lavrov in China wearing a mask with “FCKNG QRNTN” written on it!

But that is not the real reason either, as shown by the fact that the West already hated Putin long before COVID.

The “stolen” Cold War victory

In truth, the West has a very long list of reasons for which to hate Putin and everything Russian, but I believe that there is one reason which trumps them all: the western leaders sincerely believed that they had defeated the USSR in the Cold War (even medals were made to commemorate this event) and following the collapse of the former superpower and the coming to power of a clueless, alcoholic puppet (ER: Yeltsin), the triumph of the West was total. At least in appearance. The reality, as always, was much more complicated.

The causes and mechanisms of the collapse of the Soviet Union are not our topic today, so I will just indicate that I believe that the USSR never “collapsed” but that it was deliberately destroyed by the CPSU apparatus which decided to break up the country in order for the Party and Nomenklatura to remain in power, not at the helm of the USSR, but at the helm of the various ex-Soviet republics. Weak leaders and ideologies which nobody really believes in do not inspire people to fight for their rulers. This is why the Russian monarchy collapsed, this is why the masonic democracy of Kerenskii collapsed and this is why the Soviet Union collapsed (this is also one of the most likely reasons for the final collapse of the US as a state).

Putin, who was not very well known in the West or, for that matter, in Russia, came to power and immediately reversed Russia’s course towards the abyss. First, he dealt with the two most urgent threats, the oligarchs and the Wahabi insurrection in the Caucasus. Many Russians, including myself, were absolutely amazed at the speed and determination of his actions. As a result, Putin suddenly found himself one of the most popular leaders in Russian history. Initially, the West went into a kind of shock, then through a process reminiscent of the so-called “Kübler-Ross model” and, finally, the West settled into a russophobic frenzy not seen since the Nazi regime in Germany during WWII.

To understand why Putin is the Devil incarnate, we have to understand that the leaders of the collective West really thought that this time around, after a millennium of failures and embarrassing defeats, the West has finally “defeated” Russia which would now become a leaderless, culture-less, spiritual-less and, of course, history-less territory whose sole purpose would be to provide resources for the “Triumphant West”. Not only that, but the AngloZionist leaders of the Empire executed the 9/11 false flag operation, which gave them the pretext needed for the GWOT, but which completely distracted the West from its previous focus on the so-called “Russian threat” simply because by 2001 there was no Russian threat. So there was a certain logic behind these moves. And then, “suddenly” (at least for western leaders) Russia was “back”: in 2013 Russia stopped the planned US/NATO attack on Syria (the pretext here was Syrian chemical weapons). In 2014 Russia gave her support to the Novorussian uprising against the Ukronazi regime in Kiev and, in the same year, Russia also used her military to make it possible for the local population to vote on a referendum to join Russia. Finally, in 2015, Russia stunned the West with an extremely effective military intervention in Syria.

In this sequence, Russia committed two very different types of “crimes” (from the AngloZionist point of view, of course):

• The minor crime of doing what Russia actually did and
• The much bigger crime of never asking the Empire for the permission to do so

The West likes to treat the rest of the planet like some kind of junior partner, with very limited autonomy and almost no real agency (the best example is what the USA did to countries like Poland or Bulgaria). If and when any such “junior” country wants to do something in its foreign policy, it absolutely has to ask for permission from its AngloZionist Big Brother. Not doing so is something akin to sedition and revolt. In the past, many countries were “punished” for daring to have an opinion or, even more so, for daring to act on it.

It would not be inaccurate to summarize it all by saying that Putin flipped his finger to the Empire and its leaders. That “crime of crimes” was what really triggered the current anti-Russian hysteria. Soon, however, the (mostly clueless) leaders of the Empire ran into an extremely frustrating problem: while the russophobic hysteria did get a lot of traction in the West, in Russia it created a very powerful blowback because of a typical Putin “judo” move: far from trying to suppress the anti-Russian propaganda of the West, the Kremlin used its power to make it widely available (in Russian!) through the Russian media. The direct result of this was two fold: first, the CIA/MI6 run “opposition” began to be strongly associated with the russophobic enemies of Russia and, second, the Russian general public further rallied around Putin and his unyielding stance. In other words, calling Putin a dictator and, of course, a “new Hitler”, the western PSYOPs gained some limited advantage in the western public opinion, but totally shot itself in the leg with the Russian public.

I refer to this stage as the “phase one anti-Putin strategic PSYOP”. As for the outcome of this PSYOP, I would not only say that it almost completely failed, but I think that it had the exact opposite intended effect inside Russia.

A change of course was urgently needed.

The redirection of US PSYOPs against Putin and Russia

I have to admit that I have a very low opinion of the US intelligence community, including its analysts. But even the rather dull US “Russia area specialist” eventually figured out that telling the Russian public opinion that Putin was a “dictator” or a “killer of dissidents” or a “chemical poisoner of exiles” resulted in a typically Russian mix of laughter and support for the Kremlin. Something had to be done.

So some smart ass somewhere in some basement came up with the following idea: it makes no sense to accuse Putin of things which make him popular at home, so let’s come up with a new list of accusations carefully tailored to the Russian public.

Let’s call this a “phase two anti-Putin PSYOP operation”.

And this is how the “Putin is in cahoots with” thing began. Specifically, these accusations were deployed by the US PSYOPs and those in its pay:

• Putin is disarming Syria
• Putin will sell out the Donbass
• Putin is a puppet of Israel and, specifically, Netanyahu
• Putin is a corrupt traitor to the Russian national interests
• Putin is allowing Israel to bomb Syria
• Putin is selling the Siberian riches to China and/or Putin is subjugating Russia to China
• Putin is corrupt, weak and even cowardly
• Putin was defeated by Erdogan in the Nagorno-Karabakh war

The above are the main talking points immediately endorsed and executed by the US strategic PSYOPs against Russia.

Was it effective?

Yes, to some degree. For one thing, these “anti-Russian PSYOPS reloaded” were immediately picked up by at least part of what one could call the “internal patriotic opposition” (much of it very sincerely and without any awareness of being skillfully manipulated). Even more toxic was the emergence of a rather loud neo-Communist (or, as Ruslan Ostashko often calls them “emo-Marxist”) movement (I personally refer to as a sixth column) which began an internal anti-Kremlin propaganda campaign centered on the following themes:

• “All is lost” (всепропальщики): that is thesis which says that nothing in Russia is right, everything is either wrong or evil, the country is collapsing, so is its economy, its science, its military, etc. etc. etc. This is just a garden variety of defeatism, nothing more.
• “Nothing was achieved since Putin came to power”: this is a weird one, since it takes an absolutely spectacular amount of mental gymnastics to not see that Putin literally saved Russia from total destruction. This stance also completely fails to explain why Putin is so hated by the Empire (if Putin did everything wrong, like, say Yeltsin did, he would be adored in the West, not hated!).
• All the elections in Russia were stolen. Here the 5th (CIA/MI6 run) column and 6th column have to agree: according to both of them, there is absolutely no way most Russians supported Putin for so many years, and there is no way they support him now. And never mind the fact that the vast majority of polls show that Putin was, and still is, the most popular political figure in Russia.

Finally, the big SNAFU with the pension reform definitely did not help Putin’s ratings, so he had to take action: he “softened” some of the worst provisions of this reform and, eventually, he successfully sidelined some of the worst Atlantic Integrationists, including Medvedev himself.

Sadly, some putatively pro-Russian websites, blogs and individuals showed their true face when they jumped on the bandwagon of this 2nd strategic PSYOP campaign, probably with the hope to either become more noticed, or get some funding, or both. Hence, all the nonsense about Russia and Israel working together or Putin “selling out” we have seen so many times recently. The worst thing here is that these websites, blogs and individuals have seriously misled and distressed some of the best real friends of Russia in the West.

None of these guys ever address a very simple question: if Putin is such a sellout, and if all is lost, why does the AngloZionist Empire hate Putin so much? In almost 1,000 years of warfare (spiritual, cultural, political, economic and military) against Russia, the leaders of the West have always hated real Russian patriots and they have always loved the (alas, many) traitors to Russia. And now, they hate Putin because he is such a terrible leader?

This makes absolutely no sense.

Conclusion: is a war inevitable now?

The US/NATO don’t engage in strategic PYSOPs just because they like or dislike somebody. The main purpose of such PSYOPs is to break the other side’s will to resist. This was also the main objective of both (phase one and phase two) anti-Putin PSYOPs. I am happy to report that both phases of these PYSOPs failed. The danger here is that these failures have failed to convince the leaders of the Empire of the need to urgently change course and accept the “Russian reality”, even if they don’t like it.

Ever since “Biden” (the “collective Biden”, of course, not the potted plant) Administration (illegally) seized power, what we saw was a sharp escalation of anti-Russian statements. Hence, the latest “uhu, he is a killer” – this was no mistake by a senile mind, this was a carefully prepared declaration. Even worse, the Empire has not limited itself to just words, it also did some important “body moves” to signal its determination to seek even further confrontation with Russia:

• There has been a lot of sabre-rattling coming from the West, mostly some rather ill-advised (or even outright stupid) military maneuvers near/along the Russian border. As I have explained it a billion times, these maneuvers are self-defeating from a military point of view (the closer to the Russian border, the more dangerous for the western military force). Politically, however, they are extremely provocative and, therefore, dangerous.
• The vast majority of Russian analysts do not believe that the US/NATO will openly attack Russia, if only because that would be suicidal (the current military balance in Europe is strongly in Russia’s favor, even without using hypersonic weapons). What many of them now fear is that “Biden” will unleash the Ukronazi forces against the Donbass, thereby “punishing” both the Ukraine and Russia (the former for its role in the US presidential campaign). I tend to agree with both of these statements.

At the end of the day, the AngloZionist Empire was always racist at its core, and that empire is still racist: for its leaders, the Ukrainian people are just cannon fodder, an irrelevant third rate nation with no agency which has outlived its utility (US analysts do understand that the US plan for the Ukraine has ended in yet another spectacular faceplant such delusional plans always end up with, even if they don’t say so publicly). So why not launch these people into a suicidal war against not only the LDNR but also Russia herself? Sure, Russia will quickly and decisively win the military war, but politically it will be a PR disaster for Russia as the “democratic West” will always blame Russia, even when she clearly did not attack first (as was the case in 08.08.08, most recently).

I have already written about the absolutely disastrous situation of the Ukraine three weeks ago so I won’t repeat it all here, I will just say that since that day, things have gotten even much worse: suffice to say that the Ukraine has moved a lot of heavy armor to the line of contact while the regime in Kiev has now banned the import of Russian toilet paper (which tells you what the ruling gang thinks of as important and much needed measures). While it is true that the Ukraine has become a totally failed state since the Neo-Nazi coup, there is now a clear acceleration of the collapse of not only the regime or state, but of the country as a whole. Ukraine is falling apart so fast that one could start an entire website tracking only all this developing horror, not day by day, but, hour by hour. Suffice to say that “Ze” (ER: relatively new leader and former actor, Volodomyr Zelensky) has turned out to be even worse than Poroshenko. The only thing Poroshenko did which “Ze” has not (yet!) is to start a war. Other than that, the rest of what he did (by action or inaction) can only be qualified as “more of the same, only worse”.

Can a war be prevented?

I don’t know. Putin gave the Ukronazis a very stern warning (“grave consequences for Ukraine’s statehood as such“). I don’t believe for one second that anybody in power in Kiev gives a damn about the Ukraine or the Ukrainian statehood, but they are smart enough to realize that a Russian counter-attack in defense of the LDNR (ER: Lugansk and Donetsk, the eastern, pro-Russian region of Ukraine) and, even more so, Crimea, might include precision “counter-leadership” strikes with advanced missiles. The Ukronazi leaders would be well-advised to realize that they all have a crosshair painted on their heads. They might also think about this: what happened to every single Wahabi gang leader in Chechnya since the end of the 2nd Chechen war? (hint: they were all found and executed). Will that be enough to stop them?

Maybe. Let’s hope so.

But we must now keep in mind that for the foreseeable future, there are only two options left for the Ukraine: “a horrible ending or a horror without end” (Russian expression).

1. The best scenario for the people of the Ukraine would be a (hopefully relatively peaceful) breakup of the country into manageable parts.
2. The worst option would definitely be a full-scale war against Russia.

Judging by the rhetoric coming out of Kiev these days, most Ukrainian politicians are firmly behind option #2, especially since that is also the only option acceptable to their overseas masters. The Ukrainians have also adopted a new military doctrine (they call it a “military security strategy of Ukraine”) which declares Russia the aggressor state and military adversary of the Ukraine.

This might be the reason why Merkel and Macron recently had a videoconference with Putin (“Ze” was not invited): Putin might be trying to convince Merkel and Macron that such a war would be a disaster for Europe. In the meantime, Russia is rapidly reinforcing her forces along the Ukrainian border, including in Crimea.

But all these measures can only deter a regime which has no agency. The outcome shall be decided in Washington DC, not Kiev. I am afraid that the traditional sense of total impunity of US political leaders will, once again, give them a sense of very little risk (for them personally or for the USA) in triggering a war in the Ukraine. The latest news on the US-Ukrainian front is the delivery by the USN of 350 tonnes of military equipment in Odessa. Not enough to be militarily significant, but more than enough to further egg on the regime in Kiev to an attack on the Donbass and/or Crimea.

In fact, I would not even put it past “Biden” to launch an attack on Iran while the world watches the Ukraine and Russia go to war. After all, the other country whose geostrategic position has been severely degraded since Russia moved her forces to Syria is Israel, the one country which all US politicians will serve faithfully and irrespective of any costs (including human costs for the USA). The Israelis have been demanding a war on Iran since at least 2007, and it would be very naive to hope that they won’t eventually get their way. Last, but not least, there is the crisis which Blinken’s condescending chutzpah triggered with China which, so far, has resulted in an economic war only, but which might also escalate at any moment, especially considering all the many recent anti-Chinese provocations by the US Navy.

Right now the weather in the eastern Ukraine is not conducive to offensive military operations. The snow is still melting, creating very difficult and muddy road conditions (called “rasputitsa” in Russian) which greatly inhibit the movement of forces and troops. These conditions will, however, change with the warmer season coming, at which point the Ukronazi forces will be ideally poised for an attack.

In other words, barring some major development, we might be only weeks away from a major war.

The following article makes a fascinating read. The current destructive debacle of the Covid/Vaccine psychological warfare attack on the people of Earth has brought into view like never before this glaring fact:

We need to thoroughly re-examine and re-evaluate Big Pharma’s flawed paradigm and parasitic operations that feed upon the programmed self doubt that is crippling our aspiring civilisation.

Big Pharma Invented These Diseases To Sell Drugs (Osteoporosis Is One Of Them)

Let’s say you’ve invented a new gadget and you want to manufacture and sell it. Only problem is, it does something that nobody needs.

There was a point in history, not all that long ago, when you’d wisely move on to your next invention. But with the age of advertising a new option was created. By placing manipulative ads in newspapers, on the radio, or on television, you can do more than just let people know that your product exists; you can convince them they need it.

Imagine now that your invention caused physical harm to those who bought and used it. What if it made them nauseous, dizzy, unable to drive or think straight, or caused spontaneous bone fractures? That would be immoral, right?

Yet it’s happening right this moment all over the world. Big Pharma regularly patents new drugs that wind up in the medicine cabinets of millions of people– people who do not need the drug they’ve been convinced to take, but who suffer dangerous side effects in exchange for an often illusory benefit. Osteoporosis drugs, such as Fosamax and Boniva, are good examples.

Today we’ll look at two drugs that were created for invented diseases, at the meaning of disease mongering, and more.

What Is Disease Mongering?

The phrase disease mongering was coined by medical and science writer Lynn Payer in her 1992 book “Disease-Mongers: How Doctors, Drug Companies, and Insurers Are Making You Feel Sick.” Payer defined this deceitful practice as “trying to convince essentially well people that they are sick, or slightly sick people that they are very ill.” That was 25 years ago, and it has only gotten worse since then.

While there are various ways to disease monger, the reason is always the same: profit. Pharmaceutical manufacturers are for-profit, most often publicly traded companies. They aim to show earnings to their stockholders, so they’re under pressure to keep creating new drugs, as older drugs lose their patent.

One of the earliest examples of disease mongering is Listerine, invented in 1879 and used as an antiseptic and even a floor cleaner before its creators figured out how they could sell it. After marketing it to dentists for in-office oral care, they started selling it directly to consumers. Except that consumers didn’t need it. So the creators invented a disease that their product “cured”: halitosis, which is nothing but bad breath.

The name halitosis was borrowed from antiquated medical texts and paraded as a disease that could have dire consequences for your personal and professional life. By taking advantage of people’s insecurities, and through the creation of manipulative soap-opera-like commercials, Listerine turned into a sought after remedy for a previously non-existent malady.

The same method is applied by Big Pharma today, and it’s incredibly profitable. For every dollar Big Pharma spends on advertising directly to consumers they make about $4.20 in sales. That turnaround really adds up over the millions and millions of dollars spent on advertising.1

As a result, drug mongering becomes the primary activity of companies that claim to be focused on research and development. Of the 100 largest pharmaceutical companies, 64 spent at least double the amount of money on marketing than on research and development, 58 spent triple, 43 spent five times as much, and 27 spent ten times as much.1 These companies claim to be in the business of curing diseases, but the facts show that a big portion of their business is actually inventing them.

Disease Mongering And Osteoporosis

This story should sound familiar to Savers: when the pharmaceutical giant Merck first isolated the drug that became Fosamax, there was no market for it. There was no disease that it could treat. Instead of moving on to the next idea, they decided to engineer osteoporosis, and then osteopenia, through intensive lobbying, influence, and manipulation of the Medical Establishment.

The Osteoporosis Reversal Program clearly states that osteoporosis is not a disease. The rejection of the pathologizing of osteoporosis is an important first step towards actually addressing the true cause of bone loss and making the lifestyle changes required to reverse it. Here is the definition of osteoporosis given in the Program:

“A condition of the skeletal system, common in middle aged and older individuals, mainly caused by the body’s attempt to correct an unhealthy biochemical imbalance by utilizing the calcium that should normally remain in the bones, causing bone density loss. However, unless certain abnormal endocrine and/or gastrointestinal conditions are present, the biochemical imbalance may be corrected by diet and lifestyle changes.”

Osteoporosis drugs don’t even accomplish their goal of reducing fractures. In fact one of the side effects of Fosamax is atypical fractures. A drug causing more problems than it solves is a tragic pattern in the story of disease mongering.

Sometimes when people first hear this information they are shocked, and reluctant to believe that the Medical Establishment could be complicit in something so brazen and shameful. But sadly, it’s true, and it’s not just limited to mouthwash and bone health.

We can better understand, and thus recognize, this foul play by examining other cases. Let’s have a look at two other examples of disease mongering: Dry Eye Disease and Restless Leg Syndrome.

The Invention Of Dry Eye “Disease”

Many people experience the sensation of their eyes feeling dry at certain times or under certain conditions. The Mayo Clinic explains that this happens when the tear ducts aren’t able to provide adequate lubrication, which leads to temporary discomfort especially when staring at a screen for too long, riding a bike, or when in a heavily air-conditioned room.2

As with every physical trait, some people may have an anomalously severe version, but this would be a very small fraction of the populace. For those people, a product to lubricate the eyes makes sense. But to make billions of dollars off patented eye drops, a much larger market is needed. This is where disease mongering comes into play.

Here’s a commercial for Allergan’s prescription eye drop Restasis. Look out for the hallmarks of drug mongering: labelling a condition a “disease”, convincing viewers it’s harmful, and insistence that the only course of action is pharmaceutical.

It’s no wonder that people are convinced by slick commercials like the above that their life could be improved through the use of a drug, even though it might have side effects, or create the risk of infection, as in the case of Restasis. Here’s a list of the side effects that Allergan has publically disclosed:3

• eye burning,
• redness,
• tearing,
• discharge,
• pain,
• itching,
• stinging,
• visual blurring, or
• feeling as if something is in the eye

In addition, cases have been reported of hypersensitivity (including eye swelling, urticaria, rare cases of severe angioedema, face swelling, tongue swelling, pharyngeal edema, and dyspnea); and superficial injury of the eye (from the vial tip touching the eye during administration).3

Allergan states on their website that there are other side effects that they don’t list. And all too frequently, pharmaceutical companies are found guilty of lying to people about the possibility of severe and often life threatening side effects. You’ll notice almost none of this is mentioned in the commercial above.

The creation of this “disease” has been so effective that the number of Restasis users has continued to grow. In a recent report, Allergan boasted that the demand for this type of drug has grown 30% since last year.4

It doesn’t seem likely that 30% more people suddenly developed a condition so severe that they independently asked their doctor for a pharmaceutical intervention. Those people were convinced by advertising that they have a disease; one that was invented to sell a product.

Restless Leg Syndrome

Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS) is a real neurological disorder that creates an irresistible urge to move one’s body to stop an uncomfortable physical sensation. It’s also extremely rare, and about 60% of cases are inherited, so people who have this rare condition likely already knew they were at risk of it.5

GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s second largest drug company, developed a drug called Requip that was intended to help manage the symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease. Seeking further profit from a drug they had already developed, in 2005 they managed to get the drug approved for Restless Leg Syndrome.

Given the small number of people who suffer from RLS, this seems like an unproductive move, until you factor in the disease mongering GlaxoSmithKline knew it could accomplish. Anyone who feels restless for reasons that could have nothing to do with a condition could be convinced that this drug might improve their life.

What those people might really need is to drink less caffeine, get more exercise, change their lifestyle to accommodate more restful sleep, or accept that they tend to get restless and adjust their activities accordingly. What they don’t need is a prescription drug. Especially one with potentially harmful side effects.

Requip can result in dizziness, nausea, somnolence (falling asleep), viral infection and even hallucinations. But the way, these side effects are listed in the commercial below. Falling asleep at the wheel, developing a sudden gambling addiction, or suffering fainting spells is not a reasonable risk, but this commercial might make you feel otherwise.

This ad doesn’t even represent the full range of possible side effects. Here’s the staggering list of only the major problems that can arise when taking this drug.6

Most Common:

• confusion
• dizziness, faintness, or lightheadedness when getting up from a lying or sitting position suddenly
• drowsiness
• falling
• nausea
• seeing, hearing, or feeling things that are not there (hallucinations)
• sleepiness or unusual drowsiness
• swelling of the legs
• twisting, twitching, or other unusual body movements
• unusual tiredness or weakness
• worsening of parkinsonism

Less common:

• abdominal or stomach pain
• bloating or swelling of the face, arms, hands, lower legs, or feet
• blood in the urine
• blurred vision
• burning, pain, or difficulty in urinating
• chest pain
• chills
• cold sweats
• cough
• double vision or other eye or vision problems
• fainting
• fear or nervousness
• feeling of constant movement of self or surroundings
• high or low blood pressure
• irregular or pounding heartbeat
• loss of memory
• mental depression
• pain
• pain in the arms or legs
• pounding in the ears
• rapid weight gain
• sensation of spinning
• slow or fast heartbeat
• sore throat
• sweating
• tightness in chest
• tingling of hands or feet
• tingling, numbness, or prickly feelings
• trouble in concentrating
• troubled breathing
• unusual weight gain or loss
• vomiting

Rare:

• anxiety
• buzzing or ringing in the ears
• changes in vision
• fever
• headache
• joint pain
• loss of bladder control
• muscle cramps, pain, or spasms
• nasal congestion
• runny nose
• sneezing
• trouble with swallowing
• unusual urges

That last one, “unusual urges,” demonstrates the deceit practiced by GlaxoSmithKline. It refers to a troubling pattern that emerged among people taking Requip: the development of severe gambling problems, shopping addictions and hypersexuality.

Many people have reported developing sudden uncontrollable gambling addictions that have drained their savings and strained their relationships. The personal accounts on message boards about these drugs are absolutely heartbreaking. Pharmaceutical companies have even been successfully sued by some sufferers who had their lives destroyed by the side effects of a drug that claimed merely to help them sleep more comfortably.

Creating Diseases Doesn’t Make Anyone Healthier

It’s clear that disease mongering is a danger and a burden. Another truth that emerges from this data is that even those who are genuinely helped by these drugs to solve one problem could easily end up suffering from side effects that often are even worse than the condition they’re treating.

Big Pharma is barking up the wrong tree, and their reductionism is at odds with the function and form of the human body. Our biology is complex beyond our complete comprehension, and using chemicals to artificially alter the function of our brains, hormones, and other biological systems can have many negative ramifications.

This is one of the reasons why the Osteoporosis Reversal Program advocates a holistic approach to bone health. Research has proven that natural solutions work, are safe, and effective in the fight for stronger bones. A balanced diet, regular exercise, and a bone-healthy lifestyle, do more than just improve bone quality – they also improve life quality.

If you haven’t already, you can read more about the history of the invention of osteoporosis, the ways the Medical Establishment has profited from it, and learn about a natural, drug-free treatment to combat bone loss in the Osteoporosis Reversal Program. Don’t be frightened into believing you’re sick and helpless by advertising, doctors, or the drug industry. You are intelligent, capable, and full of life!

Till next time,

We don’t all get to choose where we live; at least, not the state we live in. For most of us, that’s determined by our work; we live where our jobs are. But what about when our jobs no longer determine where we live? Can that happen? It usually does when we reach retirement.

Granted, most people don’t move once they retire, but you’d be surprised how many people actually do. The area where I live has tens of thousands of retired winter residents who come down here to escape the cold weather “up north.” Some of those people come for the winter and just end up staying on, becoming permanent residents in the area. So if they can, you and I can too.

That raises the question of where we would go to retire, if we could go anywhere we want. As preppers, there’s more to that question for us, than there is for our friends and neighbors (unless they are preppers too). We obviously would want to go somewhere where we can live comfortably, even should a TEOTWAWKI scale disaster strike.

My Criteria

This is actually a fairly complex question, with a lot of factors involved. So let me see if I can thin it out a bit for you. I’m not going to tell you where you should go; but let me offer you a glimpse of states that you should avoid going to. I’m basing my decisions on the following criteria:

• Population Density – The higher the population density of an area, the more of a fight for resources. This fight will probably hurt the poor, the aging and single mothers more than anyone, as they will not have the ability to fight. Survival of the fittest will take over, as people literally fight for the available resources. That’s enough to make many areas unattractive.
• Average Annual Rainfall – We all know that water is going to be a problem in a post-disaster world. Areas with little rainfall and few rivers will be hard to live in. For most of us, the best way of harvesting water is probably going to be rainfall capture, so we’re going to need a lot of rainfall.
• Political Leaning – While we all assume that government services and interference in our lives is going to be severely curtailed during a post-disaster situation, we have to think about the here and now as well. Many of the bluest states in the country are also the ones which are working the hardest to take away our Second Amendment rights. That alone is enough to say that those states aren’t a good place to move to.
• Federally Owned Land – A lot of people talk about bugging out to the wild. That’s great; I have my own plans for that as well. But in most cases, the only practical place to bug out into the wild is federally owned land; national parks, national forests and other land under the control of the federal government. So states with little federal land ownership aren’t all that attractive for preppers to retire to.
• Forestation – The most practical means of heating a home in a post-disaster world, especially one in which there is no electricity, is with wood. That means having a lot of forests available, where you can cut that wood. This leaves out huge swaths of the nation, such as the entire breadbasket, which is farmland, nor forests.

There may be other criteria which are important to consider; but I limited myself to those five. To me, those seem like the major ones which will affect a prepper’s ability to survive, both in a pre-disaster and a post-disaster world.

The Worst States

Based on that, here are my picks for the worst states to retire in, if you’re a prepper:

• New York – I lived in upstate New York for a number of years and it is absolutely beautiful. There are miles and miles of hardwood forests, lakes and rivers. But even so, the state is one of the most heavily populated in the country. It is also one of the most left-leaning states, politically speaking, with some of the harshest anti-gun laws around. It would be a very difficult state to survive in.
• California – In many ways, California and New York are copies of each other. Both have a high population and both are strongly blue. While California has a lot going for it, in the area of natural resources, it has the highest population of any state in the Union. We can expect many people to expand outwards from the major population centers, gobbling up everything in their path. I sure wouldn’t want to be in their path.
• Florida – At first glance, Florida looks like a great place to go and a lot of people retire there. But much of the state is covered up by the Everglades. Unless you are going to learn how to survive in that harsh environment, it might not be a great place to be. The lack of forestation really isn’t much of an issue, as you aren’t really going to have to heat your home. But you are going to have to worry about hurricanes, which seem to have an affinity for the state.
• Arizona – Another popular retirement state that’s going to be a mess in a post-disaster world. Arizona is extremely hot, even hotter than South Texas and the Florida peninsula. But there is very little water to be found. That alone is enough to put this state on our worst list. I seriously doubt there will be many people surviving in the heat of Arizona, without access to water.
• Minnesota – Minnesota is known as “the land of 1,000 lakes” so there’s no shortage of water there. They’re pretty good in the forestation department too. So there’s actually a lot going for this state. But it and its neighbor Wisconsin have very high populations. Unless you could get way out in the boonies, it might be hard to avoid the crowds. Of course, way out in the boonies means the coldest parts of the state, so you have the problem of cold to contend with. That not only affects how much wood you need for your fire, but the very short growing season will make it hard to grow enough food to eat.

Granted, there are a lot of other states which we can rule out, based upon the same criteria. Pretty much all of both the eastern and western seaboards would be bad places to go, for the same reasons I’ve already mentioned. The trick is finding someplace that is good to move to.

My Picks for Best States

Everyone has their own opinion, but here are my top picks for the best states or regions for retiring in as a prepper. These choices were made based on the same criteria that I used for picking the worst states.

• Eastern Texas – While Texas isn’t a perfect survival location, there are a lot of good areas in the Hill Country and eastern Texas where there is good forestation and water.
• Idaho, Western Montana and Western Wyoming – This whole area is excellent; providing a lot of forestation, water, federally owned land, rainfall and good hunting. Although far enough north that cold would be a bit of a problem, I would call this the best area of the country to have a retirement home and/or survival retreat.
• The Appalachian Mountains – This mountain range, passing through several states and changing names a number of times, is a great place to live. While there are some high population areas to avoid, there’s still a lot of back country, which would be ideal for our purposes. I’d avoid the Virginias though, for their political leaning.
• The Gulf Coast – There’s a lot of good land in the gulf states, along with people who like to hunt and fish. While there really isn’t much government land to bug out to, there are lots of forests, lots of water and lots of game to hunt.

President Joe Biden appears to be afraid of going to the border. He is also seems to be afraid of a former president who might get there to visit it before him: Donald Trump.

On Sunday, Biden was confronted about the border crisis and if he had heard if Donald Trump might visit it.

“Mr. President, we have seen Republican senators at the border,” a reporter asked him, “Former President Trump says he’s been asked by some border patrol agents to go to the border, do you think that would be productive? And any time table on when you might go?”

“We are putting in place a plan that I feel very confident about,” Biden replied. “And, and, uh, I don’t care what the other guy does.”

“The other guy”? Donald Trump appears to be living rent-free in Joe Biden’s head. On Thursday, Trump reacted to Biden’s disastrous first press conference in over two months in office.

“Nobody’s ever seen anything like it,” Donald Trump said to Laura Ingraham. “You know it. You know it better than anybody. You cover it so well. It’s very sad to watch, actually.”

Biden also announced his intention to run for re-election in 2024, although many are questioning whether he can even last through his first term. On Wednesday, the Biden White House handed off border crisis duties to Kamala Harris.

According to Trump’s senior aide Jason Miller, the former president may visit the border “soon.” It may not just be a matter of whether Trump beats Biden to the border, but whether he can also get there before Kamala Harris.

Either way, neither Harris nor Biden intend to do anything substantive to address the border crisis, unlike former President Trump.

One of the biggest humanitarian crimes committed by the government throughout this alleged crisis has been the suppression of/ignoring/refusal to deploy known effective remedies for Covid 19.

Little or no threat to anyone with a reasonably functional immune system, Covid 19 is in fact a very treatable bug even for those who are more vulnerable.

Many of my friends and colleagues may dispute that the COVID19 virus actually exists for the very good reason that it has never after all this time and despite it being allegedly “everywhere” been isolated, seen as an existing entity in an electron microscope or had its genetic sequence mapped.

They may well be right. It is kind of like everybody being freaked out about a vampire apocalypse when it turns out after a year or so that nobody has actually seen or can point to an actual vampire. However, for the sake of argument here, I am going to ignore the troublesome lack of hard evidence and assume that a COVID 19 virus actually exists even though it is nowhere near as virulent or deadly as its advertisers have made out.

One of the proven remedies for the virus is Ivermectin. The above meme gives you a neat summary of its stats and this link [Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 48 studies] gives you the full scoop for those who want to delve into the nitty gritty.

Some doctors using Ivermectin are reporting a zero fatality rate and others a results/survival rate close to 100%. By way of just one example among man, here is the highly reputable US physician Pierre Kory explaining why he strongly advocates its use.

The studies cited here suggest somewhere in the region of an 80% success rate and this gels with reports from many other physicians.

This suggests that if we take the UK gov’s notoriously false death stats at face value (about 120 000 at this writing), the large scale deployment of Ivermectin, not to mention other remedies, would have reduced the serious illness toll by 80% and the demand for hospital beds, intensive care etc by 80%. It would have reduced the alleged fatalities from 120, 000 to 24, 000.

The mere fact of deploying Ivermectin and allied remedies – actually helping doctors bring a workable cure to their patients – on a broad scale would, in essence, have meant no pandemic to terrify people about and no mass sales of vaccines.

The 24 000 alleged fatalities would have been reduced further by (a) not using intubation which is now known to have killed patients and (b) not releasing elderly people early from hospital with various infections so they could them infect others in their nursing homes with COVID19 or whatever infections they happened to have, which were being routinely counted as “COVID19” and (c) not issuing the scandalous blanket DNRs that resulted in more avoidable deaths.

But that is assuming the gov’s fatality stats are even remotely accurate. The tricks used to inflate the numbers are now well known. They include but are not limited to:

(a) lumping various illnesses with similar symptoms together (flu, colds, pneumonia, chest infections, Influenza A, Influenza B etc) under the blanket term “COVID 19”. This is an old trick that was done with the polio epidemic and AIDS and possibly others. It gives you a ready-made epidemic.

(b) using the flawed and fraudulent PCR test, the shortcomings of which are now well known, that gives you thousands – some say over 90%  – false positives. When anyone tested positive (falsely or otherwise) dies within 28 days of the test they are counted as a COVID 19 fatality even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a ruddy bus. Again, this deception is well known.

The fatality figures have been inflated so that a completely false number has been generated. The excellent news site UKColumn has estimated that the true number of deaths that were actually caused by the COVID19 bug – and almost exclusively the very frail and elderly or those suffering from serious illnesses such as diabetes and cancer –  is around 18, 000.

Had the known remedies such as Ivermectin been deployed and not ignored, the fatalities form COVID19 might well have been around 3600 for the UK. Fewer if the other factors such as early release from hospitals, DNRs and intubation discussed above are taken into account.

3600 or fewer fatalities, mainly amongst the very frail and elderly would have created no terror nd provided no excuse to mass market experimental vaccines, shut down the economy, confiscate human rights and generally give the citizenry a hard time.

The inhibition of the normal workings of the NHS (doctors unable to see patients, cancelled operations etc) due to re-prioritisation would not have occurred and this would have saved thousands of lives as well.

The falsification of the stats, the use of the fraudulent PCR test and the withholding of known remedies all comprise the woof and warp of a mass deception, the creation of a fake pandemic that amounts for all intents and purposes to an attack by a criminal government upon its own people.

Those responsible must be held to account.

The Jewish elite regards the Jewish rank-and-file as pawns to be manipulated. “Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren,” says the author of Protocols of the Elders of Zion (9-2) a “forgery” that reads like the blueprint of the New World Order. The Jewish leadership creates antisemitism in order to prevent Jews from assimilating. They funded Adolf Hitler. 
A “protection racket” is a scam where an aggressor instigates an attack, blames a bogeyman, and then offers to protect the victim from this bogeyman in return for money and power.

The “War on Terror” is a protection racket. The aggressor is the world financial elite known as the “Crown” based in the City of London. Their instrument is the Zionist project, specifically Israel, the Mossad and its Neo Con allies.

The victim is the people of the United States and the West in general. The goal is the overthrow of Western Civilization, and the establishment of a world police state called the “New World Order.”

“Zionism is but an incident of a far reaching plan,” said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. “It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon.”

The head of the Department of Homeland Security is Israeli dual citizen and Zionist Michael Chertoff. He was the New Jersey State Attorney when five Mossad agents were arrested after witnesses saw them congratulating themselves on the destruction of the World Trade Center. Their van tested positive for explosives. (See Chris Bollyn article below.) Speculators who shorted airline stocks before 9-11 have been identified as Israelis apparently.

“ANTI SEMITISM” THE ORIGINAL PROTECTION RACKET

The Jewish elite regards the Jewish rank-and-file as pawns to be manipulated. “Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren,” says the author of Protocols of the Elders of Zion (9-2) a “forgery” that reads like the blueprint of the New World Order.

Jews had to be terrorized into setting up Israel as a “national home,” i.e. colonizing the Middle East and creating a center of world government. World Finance funded the Nazis. Zionists actively collaborated with them. See “The Holocaust as Mental Paradigm.” See also “Zionism: A Conspiracy Against Jews”

Zionist betrayal is the reason Jews went passively to their deaths, says Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld in his book “Holocaust Victims Accuse.” Non-Zionist Jews were worth more dead than alive to the Zionist leadership who, Shonfeld says, reaped the moral and financial capital from their “sacrifice.” See my “Zionism: Compulsory Suicide for Jews.”

The Jewish elite has a long history of manipulating Jews in this manner. For example, in 1950 a wave of anti Semitism and terrorism in Iraq made Naeim Giladi, 21, join the Zionist underground. Giladi was imprisoned, tortured and sentenced to death by Iraqi authorities.

He escaped and fled to Israel only to discover that the bombings had been engineered by his fellow Zionists to dupe Iraqi Jews into going to Israel. An ancient community was deprived of its wealth and reduced to second-class citizen status in Israel, replacing Palestinian labor. See my “Zionists Double Crossed Iraqi Jews”

Israel provoked attacks from its neighbors in order to “retain its moral tension” according to the secret diary of Prime Minister Moshe Sharett. The state must “invent dangers” to start war and thereby “acquire our space,”
he wrote. See “The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror.”

“ANTI SEMITISM” BECOMES “ANTI AMERICANISM”

The pogrom on Sept. 11 2001 was designed to stampede Americans into forfeiting their civil rights and invading the Middle East.

There is a drumbeat in the media to convince Americans that they are victims of Muslim fanatics. This propaganda campaign is carried out by Neo Cons (a.k.a. Zionists.) In his book, “The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America,” Michael Collins Piper writes:

“In the build-up to the Iraq war, Zionist propagandists and the media increasingly began touting the message to Americans that “the whole world is against us”… and the Israelis are our only real solid dependable ally …The theme that anti Americanism had run rampant was instilled in Americans for the very purpose of making them “anti” everyone who refused to support the…Iraq war…and the more broad ranging Zionist agenda.” (157)

Sound familiar? This is the tactic they use on Jews. See my “How Jews are Brainwashed and Manipulated.”

Piper says that Zionism is being equated with Americanism. Zionist agents like Nathan Sharansky crafted the overblown and specious rhetoric of Bush’s second inaugural speech that committed the US to advancing the Zionist agenda using force.

History provides a sobering warning as to where this could be leading. In his essay, The Nature of Zionism, Russian author Vladimir Stepin writes,

“During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army – Trotsky was the chairman of the country’s Revolutionary Military Council – they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk.

The result of this was the “Law on Those Involved in Pogroms” of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of anti-Semitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot.

Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being anti-Semitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka – the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 – were Zionists.

Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practiced genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot.”

CONCLUSION

My hunch is that the central banking elite, using Masonic secret societies in the military and intelligence agencies, is responsible for 90% of terrorism. The purpose is to manipulate people into advancing the goals of the New World Order, which includes destroying true religion, nation states, democracy, race and family. In their mind, they have to destabilize and enslave us to protect their monopoly on government credit i.e. money creation.

They are running a protection racket to protect us from their artificial”terror.” Zionists or Americans who carry out their agenda could end up holding the bag if something goes wrong, or as I should say right.

Remember they are challenging the greatest power in the universe: God, or Truth as witnessed in the souls of all human beings. They are most vulnerable now on the 9-11 attack which they perpetrated. If we rise up as one to demand the truth about this atrocity, their obscene criminal enterprise will start to unravel.

ER Editor: Below is a great review piece joining the dots by bilingual Italian journalist Cesare Sacchetti, who first drew our attention to ‘Italygate’ in relation to the massive fraud in the recent US presidential elections. He doesn’t mention it below, but Sacchetti has also drawn attention in his Twitter and Telegram posts to how the Italian MSM have recently been hosting creatures like Nancy Pelosi, Gates and Obama. He does a solid job in linking globalist/NWO concerns and current events globally with what is happening in Italy. Italygate is a hornet’s nest waiting to be exposed.********

Globalism created the Covid terrorist operation to trigger the Great Reset: Italygate is still the scandal that can foil the NWO plans

CESARE SACCHETTI

Conceiving the Covid terrorist operation does not date back to 2020. The globalist élites were already seeking in the previous decades a catalyzing event to drag the world towards global dictatorship.

David Rockefeller himself revealed in a UN dinner in 1994 that everything was ready to usher in the New World Order.

All that was needed was a “right and major crisis” which would have forced the nations to surrender their sovereignty to the one-world government desired by the globalist cabal.

Basically, the principle of globalism has always been the same. The artificial crisis would play a major role in destabilizing the political scenario and in allowing the world government plan to advance forward.

There were several options available to trigger a major crisis, but the cabal chose the “pandemic” solution, and their intentions were not hidden in some secret document.

Everything was published in 2010, and it was once again the Rockefeller family that announced these globalist plans in one of their official documents called “Operation Lockstep”. By choosing the term “lockstep”, the Rockefellers were perfectly describing the global authoritarian society that will rise after the artificial “health emergency.”

It is certainly interesting to point out how the Rockefeller family played a major role in conceiving this catalyzing event. According to several scholars and authors, after the Rothschilds (who are the most influential banking family in the world), the Rockefellers are the most powerful family in the globalist hierarchy.

The Rothschilds have been exercising their influence mainly over Europe, while the Rockefellers have had control of the United States.

However, in the document previously mentioned, all what is happening now with COVID is perfectly described: An unknown animal virus suddenly mutates and infects men. To cope with this new “threat”, the world governments decide to establish an authoritarian rule over society.

Movements are restricted and mask mandates are enforced exactly in the same way that occurred after the Covid crisis.

Later, the world economy completely collapses because all economic activity is halted due to the continuous lockdowns enforced by the governments.

Once the world plunges into chaos, nation state sovereignty gradually disappears and is replaced by major supranational structures.

Then, the world is divided in several blocks and each one of these blocks is ruled by these supranational entities, which are in the hands of the industrial and banking powers.

These entities will then be the main foundation of the future world government.

Therefore, the strategy of Freemasonry and globalism is always the same. Ordo ab chaos. The planned chaos would serve in this matter to create an outcome or a “solution”, which was already set up by the same architects of the destabilization.

At this point, it is important to carefully consider the timeline. Once the Rockefellers reveal in 2010 that the “pandemic” will drag mankind towards the NWO, five years later, in 2015, the Moderna labs are already at work developing the mRNA vaccines that will be distributed in 2021, during the Covid crisis.

According to several scientists and physicians, these vaccines can change human DNA. To better understand what kind of harm these drugs can do to the world population, it is certainly helpful to quote the French scientist, Alexandra Henrion-Claude, who described the decision to give these vaccines to healthy people “complete madness”.

Once the mRNA vaccine is inside the human body, the potential molecular interactions are virtually unknown and the immune system could be completely upset by the technology of this vaccine.

Moreover, according to Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Pfizer scientific director, the mRNA vaccines can also sterilize the people who receive them.

In other words, the vaccines would be the perfect way to reach another fundamental goal of globalism, which is the reduction of world population.

All this without considering the people who are already dying from the adverse reactions of the drugs.

The American doctor, Sherri Tenpenny, has recently revealed how millions of people could die because of the side effects of these vaccines.

The paradox in this story is that the alleged “cure” recommended by the system would be the real “disease”.

The virus is the vaccine itself.

Therefore, the preparation of this crisis was already in progress during the previous years and the “pandemic” would have been triggered in any case in the present time.

The unexpected event not foreseen by globalism: Donald Trump’s election

The unforeseen event that upset the globalist plans was the election of Donald Trump in 2016.

The Covid terrorist operation would have been triggered in any case, but the élites wanted a Clinton administration that would have led the world towards the NWO without obstacles.

If this happened, Russia would have been completely isolated and the Great Reset announced by the Davos Forum would have already been a reality now.

The possibility of Trump’s election was not considered at all because the system couldn’t afford to lose control of the US, which is a chess piece too important in this game.

One of the most influential freemasons in history, Manly P. Hall, clearly explained why America is so important.

In his 1944 book, named “The secret destiny of America”, Manly P. Hall reveals how America’s mission was to lead the world towards the NWO.

The economic and military superpower of this nation had been used for decades to hit and overthrow all the world governments that defied the deep state and tried to defend their own national independence and sovereignty.

Trump separated America from globalism. The endless wars stopped and the US, for the first time after the end of WW2, placed the interests of America above those of the international cabal.

Globalism was furious because it knew very well that the one-world government is impossible without the participation of the United States.

Therefore, it orchestrated the biggest electoral fraud in history, which is the 2020 electoral fraud, to regain the control of the US.

The 2020 electoral fraud: the deep state coup to remove Trump

On the night of November 3, the operation to oust Trump started because it was clear that the President was effortlessly winning the election against the weak Democratic candidate Joe Biden.

At a certain moment in the electoral night, an order was given to the scrutineers who simultaneously halted the counting of the vote.

Hundreds of thousands of illegal mail-in votes were dumped in the ballots, and each one of these was included in the count way beyond the midnight deadline.

However, the fraud was not limited only to the mail-in votes. It was much more extended and deeper. An international electronic fraud was committed in order to remove Trump from the White House.

The hacking attack started in Frankfurt, where a CIA station hosted the Dominion servers that already had switched hundreds of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden.

However, this switching was not enough. Trump was taking so many votes that the deep state was forced to recalibrate the attack and involve Italy in the plan. This is the genesis of Italygate, which is the entire key of this international coup.

According to Maria Zack and Bradley Johnson, it was Leonardo, the Italian government tech society that had to deliver the “victory” to Biden, by switching millions of votes from Trump to Biden through its own military satellite.

Therefore, this would directly involve the previous Conte government in this attack, which would be a direct aggression of Italy against US sovereignty.

The electronic fraud allegedly took place on Via Veneto, in the headquarters of the US embassy in Italy. If this allegation were to be confirmed, then US ambassador, Lewis Eisenberg, had allowed a coup to take place against his own President.

The Italian hacker who would execute the attack: Arturo D’Elia

According to an affidavit signed by an Italian lawyer, Alfio D’Urso, Arturo D’Elia played a major role in Italygate.

D’Elia’s resumé reveals some very interesting facts. In his Linkedin profile, the Italian IT consultant lists very important posts, such as the ones for the district attorney offices of Naples and Salerno.

And this is not the most prestigious assignment that he has had. The Italian hacker also worked for NATO from 2010 to 2015.

In his Facebook profile, he shared some pictures of his drills with the NSA. It is also interesting to point out that D’Elia in his FB presentation included the Gladio motto: “Silendo libertatem servo.”

For those who are not familiar with Gladio, it is the name of a paramilitary structure coordinated by NATO and the Washington deep state that was used in Italy to prevent an eventual shift of the country towards the Warsaw pact. (ER: This paramilitary group was responsible for lots of bombings, attacks and even the kidnapping and assassination of Italian PM Aldo Mori in order to place the Italian population in fear, who would then (it was hypothesized) seek protection from the government. During the ’70s, it appeared that ‘far left’ groups were responsible for these attacks, yet it was the far right paramilitary group under NATO control that was actually responsible. Hence Gladio was a series of false flag attacks. This was attested to in court during the 80s, with Henry Kissinger being implicated.)

Therefore, D’Elia worked for a powerful globalist and Atlanticist system that had been trying to overthrow Trump since the beginning of his mandate.

The Italian hacker is not a sort of lunatic without the professional skills to do what he allegedly did.

He has all the expertise needed. The media quickly tried to dismiss this story as a “conspiracy theory”, but they failed to seek the leads that confirm the versions of Maria Zack and Bradley Johnson.

At this moment, D’Elia is in jail in Salerno for another crime committed when he worked for a Leonardo subsidiary, Alenia Aermacchi, from which he had stolen important data.

However, Italygate implies a very important fact. The key to overthrowing Donald Trump was the involvement of the Italian deep state.

But the President knew what was coming. He knew that globalism would not have allowed him to stay in the White House, and Trump signed an executive order to prevent foreign election interference against the US.

At this point, one could think that the plan to foil this international coup has failed because Joe Biden is in the White House now.

But in this regard, there is a popular quote among Trump’s circles that could help explain what is happening: “Nothing is what it seems”.

Biden is without any doubt an “anomalous” President. He still has not received a foreign leader in the White House since the beginning of his mandate and he still hasn’t held a press conference in the White House briefing room.

Another proof of this strange presidency comes from an ABC video, where Biden is speaking with the journalists who aim the mics towards him. However, if one pays more attention to the video, he can see that Biden’s hands unbelievably pass through the microphones.

In other words, this video has been grossly doctored, and one should ask himself what the reason of this gross fake is if Biden is really in charge.

But the anomalies don’t stop there. On several occasions, the Pentagon didn’t comply with the orders of the alleged commander-in-chief, and this gives strength to the idea that there’s a puppet administration in Washington, devoid of its effective powers.

The situation is so unprecedented that even the mainstream media can no longer deny that Biden is not really in charge.

In theory, this administration would have already accelerated towards the Great Reset, as the former secretary of State of the Obama administration, John Kerry has stated.

On the contrary; the number of US states that are lifting Covid restrictions is increasing.

At this point, the natural question that should be asked is: what happened on January 20, the day of the so-called Biden inauguration?

Several leads, like the presence of the National Guard in Washington, seem to indicate that in the US, a temporary military government could be in place.

Before leaving the White House, Trump could have temporarily transferred power over to the military.

Many people asked Trump to trigger the Insurrection Act to foil the coup against him. Trump could have done it, but not in an official way.

By following this strategy, the President has avoided a civil war and the possibility for the Democrats to trigger the Great Reset in the United States.

However, as stated before, the entire key to this story is Italygate. In order to overturn the result of the 2020 election, it is fundamental to prosecute the authors of this hacking attack.

The Italian deep state would have played an essential role in the coup against Trump, and this involvement does not seem to be limited only to the Conte government and Matteo Renzi, the former Italian PM.

The now presiding Mario Draghi has appointed to his cabinet some former members of Leonardo, including minister for the Ecologic Transition, Roberto Cingolani.

Cingolani is a physicist who came to the spotlight in previous years for his appearance in the Leopolda, a political event organized by Matteo Renzi, whose name constantly emerges in this web of a story.

Minister Cingolani attended also the annual meeting of the Trilateral Commission in 2016, another globalist group founded by the ubiquitous David Rockefeller in 1973.

Cingolani is not the only Draghi government member who has ties with Leonardo. Draghi picked as his chief of staff Antonio Funiciello, who had also worked for Leonardo.

Before his job as chief of staff, Funiciello worked as the former chief of staff of Gentiloni’s government. Gentiloni is remembered as the PM who appointed Alessandro Profumo as the CEO of Leonardo.

Profumo was later confirmed in this role by Conte despite his having been sentenced to six years of imprisonment for false accounting and market manipulation.

Neither Profumo nor Leonardo have denied their involvement in Italygate, and this is quite strange if one considers that Leonardo is a joint stock company. Such communications should be made at least to reassure the markets that the reputation of the company is solid and clean.

None of this was made in this case. Leonardo has been completely quiet about the case.

However, there seems to be a red thread that ties the Gentiloni, Renzi, Conte and Draghi’s governments, and this red thread is the complete hostility towards Trump.

In other words, globalism has been using mainly the Italian deep state to overthrow Trump.

In Italy, there have been and there are still now some misdirected attempts to convey the false idea that Draghi is a Trump ally.

All of these attempts are just part of a disinformation campaign orchestrated by the Italian Freemasonry and by circles close to the Northern League of Matteo Salvini, which has flipped and is now supporting Draghi’s government.

As soon as he was sworn in as PM, Draghi has been faithfully executing the Great Reset agenda by distributing mRNA vaccines and enforcing lockdowns which would provoke the bankruptcies of many other economic actors.

However, something seems to be sure. Italygate is the mother of all the scandals. This fact is simply too fundamental to ignore if we are to see the official return of Trump as President and the final defeat of the NWO.

Once this scandal finally explodes, a devastating mechanism would be set in motion that would provoke the collapse of the international deep state.

Spring has just begun and maybe some flowers could blossom very soon. At the same, Easter is approaching and with it, the hope is that the Resurrection of Christ could finally usher the final victory of Christ’s forces here on Earth.

The battle is far from over. The outcome of this battle would be in any case chosen through Italy. The proverbial, literal and political roads that lead to Rome will decide if mankind will plunge or pull back from the global totalitarian abyss.