Dr. Mylo Canderian is of the opinion that 95% of the world’s population
are “Useless Eaters” who need to be euthanized as quickly as possible.

The answer to the question: three to ten years

Disclaimer- I don’t know if this is true but, in the past, Steven Fishman has provided credible insider information.

I am often asked the question: “If I have taken the “vaccine,” how long will I live?
I deferred this question to a friend of mine, Dr. Mylo Canderian, Ph.D. [born Milos Iskanderianos, Corfu, Greece, 1938], who developed the patent for Graphene Oxide for use as a Hematological Bioweapon in 2015.

In full transparency, Dr. Canderian is what I would call a “Genocidal Globalist,” who follows Precept Ten of the Georgia Guidestones, which is very seldom discussed, stating “Be not a Cancer upon the Earth; Leave Room for Nature.”

Dr. Canderian is a Medical Contributor to the World Health Organization and is also very supportive of Klaus Schwab and the “Great Reset,” ushering in one world digital currency which is a secondary goal of the WHO for 2022.

Dr. Canderian is of the opinion that 95% of the world’s population are “Useless Eaters” who need to be euthanized as quickly as possible.

“Look at downtown Chicago, Baltimore, or Los Angeles,” he has stated, “and you will clearly see why the Useless Eaters must be put down like rabid dogs.”

He has expressed his disdain for “Infectious Educators” who promote Critical Race Theory, and is confident that the “vaccine” will put an end to “Human Cancer Upon the Earth.”

Dr. Canderian is an ardent supporter of Freemasonry’s Duty and Obligation to rid the world of the “Plague of Humanity.”

Yet on a personal level, he and I share a passion for the same exotic dish served at L’emince de Veau in Geneva: Cream of Hummingbird Soup followed by Elk Tongue.

We both are fans of Chef Gaston Sere de Rivieres, who is a culinary genius.
So, I asked Mylo, “How can the “vaccinated” know with certainty how long they have to live once they have been jabbed?”

He presented me with the information, called the “End of Cycle Formula.”

He explained how easy it is to calculate.

“The Power of Simplicity,” he said. “There is a maximum cycle of ten years from injection to End of Cycle,” [or death], he elaborated. “And it is extremely easy to determine.”

He said any hematologist can see it within seconds under a microscope, and even more readily under an electron microscope. “The percentage of blood affected [or contaminated] by or with Graphene Oxide is the reciprocity of the End of Cycle calculation,” he divulged.

In other words, an “inoculatee” [as he calls anyone jabbed with the Experimental Use Authorization Eugenics Depopulation Lethal Injection Bioweapon] having 20% Graphene Oxide deterioration in their blood will, barring any other input criteria, live for 8 years. [10 years less 20%].

Someone with 70% Graphene Oxide deterioration will not live more than 3 years. [10 years less 70%].

Dr. Jane Ruby recently was interviewed by Stew Peters on his podcast and showed examples of what the deteriorated blood looks like when exposed to Graphene Oxide.

Graphene Oxide, for those who are unaware, is the component of Messenger RNA spike proteins and prions, which is at war with the heart, lungs, brain and blood for oxygen.

Graphene Oxide is an oxygen sponge which deprives the body of necessary oxygen and causes many complications, including but not limited to anaphylactic shock, toxic blood clotting, fatal lung paralysis, mitochondrial cancer, and endothelial cancer.”
Dr. Mylo Canderian’s viewpoint is much the same as Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and the Big Pharma CEO’s: LET THEM ALL DIE!

I asked Mylo what the effect of second and third shots and boosters do and how that changes the End of Cycle table.

Mylo replied: “It is all measurable through hematological testing. The more shots and boosters the imbeciles get, the worse their blood will look under a microscope, and the quicker they will turn to fertilizer.”

Finally, I asked him how the plot to kill so many billions of people could be kept so secret by such a group of elites.

His answer was: “You don’t know much about Freemasonry, do you, Steve?” And there you have it.

One area that has not received nearly as much attention is the plan to fuse human beings with technology under the guise of “improving” mankind. Mankind will be transformed into drones who serve the one percent.

Under the new world order envisioned by the proponents of the United Nations-backed “Great Reset,” humans will be merged with machines and technology. Literally. Perhaps most incredibly, the Deep State globalists behind the efforts are coming out of the closet. These days, they are openly and literally proclaiming their intention to abolish private ownership of property and even fuse microchips into people’s brains that will be able to read and manipulate individuals’ thoughts.

Just last year, the schemes peddled under the “Great Reset” banner would have been dismissed as “crazy conspiracy theories.” Today, top globalists such as World Economic Forum boss Klaus Schwab, UN chief (and socialist leader) Antonio Guterres, IMF leader Kristalina Georgieva, and others are trumpeting their agenda from the rooftops. World leaders such as far-left Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are doing it too, despite frantic efforts by the fake media to downplay the significance.

As The New American reported this summer, shortly after the “Great Reset” agenda was unveiled, there are many elements to the plot. Everything must change, from education and business to the global economy and governance, Great Reset advocates declared during the summit announcing the scheme. However, one area that has not received nearly as much attention is the plan to fuse human beings with technology under the guise of “improving” mankind.

WEF chief Schwab, the chief marketer of the Great Reset who recently released a book with that title, has proclaimed that a key element of the “reset” will be the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution.” And in very public statements, he has explained what this means: merging man with machines.

“What the fourth industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,” Schwab explained in a speech to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

Schwab, whose accent and demeanor make him appear to be almost a caricature of some evil cartoon villain, even wrote a book on the subject in 2016 entitled Shaping the Future of The Fourth Industrial Revolution. In it, the globalist schemer explains how looming technological changes will allow governments to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.”

“Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us — they will become part of us,” continued Schwab. “Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices — from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets — will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.”

Among those technologies are “active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies,” Schwab explained. These “implantable devices,” Schwab continued, “will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals.”

Even more creepy, perhaps, is that Schwab suggested these technologies would be used by governments to determine who may travel and even for “pre-crime” purposes. “As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” he explained, adding that authorities might require “a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”

In a post on the WEF website by Danish Parliamentarian Ida Auken, the direction and goals of all this transhumanism become more clear. “Welcome to the year 2030,” Auken writes. “I don’t own anything,” including a home, and “I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded.” But her biggest concern is those who refuse to participate.

“My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city,” Auken explains, noting that some stubborn individuals refused to merge with machines. “Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it.”

The push toward transhumanism and merging with computers is becoming especially obvious in the “education” system amid the hysteria surrounding COVID. From moving everything online and sidelining teachers to bringing in Artificial Intelligence and algorithms, the technology is getting downright creepy. Huge totalitarian firms such as Google, which brazenly discriminates against Christians and conservatives, are key players as they gather enormous amounts of sensitive data on children and blatantly manipulate the public.

The WEF, which is leading the push with help from the UN and the IMF, is a powerhouse. Every year, it brings together billionaires and even mass-murdering dictators from around the world to promote globalism and technocracy under the guise of “helping” humanity. Naturally, all of the major tech companies — Facebook, Alphabet, Microsoft, and so on — are intimately involved. Fringe billionaire totalitarians such as George Soros are key players, too.

LONG TERM PLAN

The push for the “Great Reset” is hardly the first time the elites have peddled the trans-humanist agenda. At the 2018 “World Government Summit” in the United Arab Emirates, top globalists and “world leaders” gathered to push, among other key themes, the normalization and glorification of “cyborgs.” Indeed, the confab, which brings together top leaders of government and business, offered a prominent role to a self-proclaimed “cyborg” named Neil Harbisson, who argued that governments must facilitate the transition to at least some people becoming “part-technology, part-human.”

“I have an antenna that is implanted inside my head, which allows me to extend my perception of reality beyond the visual spectrum,” said Harbisson, co-founder of the Cyborg Society and the Transpecies Society which fight for people who “identify” as non-human. “I can sense infrared and ultraviolet, and I also have an internet connection in my head that allows me to receive colors from other parts of the world, or connect to satellites so I can send colors from space.”

The year before that, globalists at the World Government Summit gathered under a replica of the “Arch of Baal,” a monument to the demon god of the Canaanites frequently referred to in the Bible. More than a few commentators saw it as an ominous sign.

Aside from the fusion with machines and technology, globalist elites are also pushing for genetic modification of everything — including humans. In fact, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates has openly pushed for such schemes. In 2018, he touted gene-editing technology in Foreign Affairs, the mouthpiece of the globalist Deep State organ known as the Council on Foreign Relations. More recently, he has celebrated vaccines that literally alter the genetic code of those receiving them.

The transhumanist movement has been on the fringes, under the radar, for decades. In the late 1990s, Swedish economist Nick Bostrom of Oxford and British “philosopher” David Pearce founded the World Transhumanist Association. And more recently, in his book Homo Deus, Israeli author and historian Yuval Noah Harari has also been peddling the idea that mankind is on the verge of evolving to god-like status through technology. Ultimately, humans would be re-designed using genetic modification and technological “upgrades.”

“It is very likely, within a century or two, Homo sapiens, as we have known it for thousands of years, will disappear,” Harari said at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs recently. “We will use technology to upgrade ourselves — or at least some of us — into something different; something which is far more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals.” The establishment media has been breathlessly parroting his propaganda…

If the comments under its videos on YouTube are any indication, the globalist Great Reset is less popular than cockroaches and head lice. However, that does not mean the Deep State will give up on trying to advance its agenda under the slogan, which fits nicely with the UN and Biden, “Build Back Better” and the schemes outlined in UN Agenda 2030. It is basically the same old “New World Order” agenda, complete with the elimination of private property, privacy, self-government, and nation-states, now fused with transhumanism. Those who value truth, liberty, and humanity must resist.

President Joe Biden has now declared that the United States is facing an existential crisis comparable to what it experienced during the Civil War, a struggle that will produce a truly democratic form of government with universal franchise or which will result in the denial of basic rights to many citizens. And he is quite willing to address the issue employing a maximum of emotion and fear mongering unmitigated by a minimum of reasonable suasion, saying “We’re facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That’s not hyperbole. Since the Civil War — the Confederates back then never breached the Capitol as insurrectionists did on January the 6th. I’m not saying this to alarm you. I’m saying this because you should be alarmed.”

Of course, what may have occurred on January 6^th has nothing to do with the issue currently in play, which is voting rights, though it is only one aspect of what is essentially a revolution sponsored by the Democratic Party to reorder the American political system in such a fashion as to guarantee its dominance for decades to come. Other steps will include greatly increased immigration, a war on so-called domestic terrorists and decriminalizing or choosing not to prosecute many felonies committed by party constituencies.

The voting rights legislation currently before Congress includes the interestingly named For the People Act and its successor the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, both of which would seek to restore certain unconstitutional aspects of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Most important, they would eliminate the ability of the states to pass legislation that creates conditions on registering and voting. The text of the John Lewis Act now before Congress refers to these steps as “discriminatory laws, needless barriers, and partisan dirty tricks.”

At the heart of the push by the Democrats is the creation of a uniform national electoral system which will essentially make it much easier for people to vote, permitting block voting, ballot harvesting and both registration and voting itself by mail. If passed, the new legislation will compel each state to adopt “automatic and same-day voter registration, voting rights for felons, no-excuse absentee balloting, mandatory early voting, and taxpayer funding for political campaigns.”

The key objections to the new voting procedure being promoted by Biden are several, largely related to its lack of any requirement for potential voters to provide information or show documentation confirming citizenship and residency or even one’s identity. The Democrats are denouncing their Republican opponents who are raising these issues as guilty of “voter suppression.” If the Democrats win the debate, it will be possible for anyone to vote in elections without having any human contact whatsoever using the mail-in ballots which are potentially susceptible to large scale fraud.

Another problem with the Biden program to nationalize voting procedures is that the there are four amendments to the United States Constitution that make it clear that it is left to the states to determine the modalities of voting. That means that even if the new voting act passes through Congress and is signed by the president there still would certainly be challenges based on its unconstitutionality. While Blue states will presumably go along with the guidance from Washington, those states still leaning Red will undoubtedly resist any nationalization of voting procedures.

It is not as if the current voting system is fraud-resistant. All too often it is not, which is why state legislatures in Georgia, Texas and several other Republican controlled states have passed new voting laws that actually require in many cases one’s physical presence to vote as well as production of documentation or information confirming citizenship and residency. They also include the purging of electoral rolls of voters who have died or moved. The new laws come as close as is reasonably possible to creating a system where voting security and integrity will be greatly enhanced, but the fact is that the Democrats are not at all interested in reducing criminal voting. They are interested in creating a permissive environment where all their presumed supporters will be able to vote without having to make any effort to do so or even be compelled to demonstrate who they really are and that they are citizens.

Prior to the recent national election, I examined the procedures to register and vote in my home state of Virginia and determined that one could both register and vote without any human contact at all. The registration process can be accomplished by filling out an online form. Note particularly the following: the form requires one to check the box indicating US citizenship. It then asks for name and address as well as social security number, date of birth and whether one has a criminal record or is otherwise disqualified to vote. You then have to sign and date the document and mail it off. Within ten days, you should receive a voter’s registration card for Virginia which you can present if you vote in person, though even that is not required.

It is important to realize that no documents have to actually be presented to support the application, which means that all the information can be false. You can even opt out of providing a social security number by checking the box indicating that you have never been issued one, even though the form indicates that you must have one to be registered, and you can also submit a temporary address by claiming you are “homeless.” Even date of birth information is useless as the form does not ask where you were born, which is how birth records are filed by state and local governments. Ultimately, it is only the social security number that validates the document and that is what also appears on the Voter’s ID Card, but even that can be false or completely fabricated, as many illegal immigrant workers in the US have discovered.

Prior to the November election my wife and I received unsolicited four mail-in ballots, all of which were sent to us anonymously. I examined the ballots carefully and noted that they bore no serial numbers or other forms of validation that could conceivably be used to limit the potential for fraud. In a state like Virginia, the actual mail-in ballot only requires your signature and that of a witness, who can be anyone. That is also true in six other states. Thirty-one states require only your own signature on the ballot while just three states require that the document be notarized, a good safeguard since it requires the voter to actually produce some documentation and identification. Seven states require your additional signature on the ballot envelope and two states require that a photocopy of the voter ID accompany the ballot. Some of these procedures may have been changed since the November allegation but it appears that only the handful of Republican states that are in the process of passing new voting laws are taking the problem seriously. In other words, the safeguards in the system continue at this time to vary from state to state but in most cases, fraud would be relatively easy if one is using mail-in voting. In fact, former President Jimmy Carter’s headed a bipartisan commission in 2005 that concluded that mail-in ballots constitute the “largest source of potential voter fraud” of any voting system.

Joe Biden is of course right about a crisis developing comparable to the Civil War, but what he is choosing to ignore is that his White House is carelessly feeding into what has become a growing chorus of dissent. He and his colleagues in Congress are deliberately and with malice pushing an agenda that, if successful, will lead to something like one party rule in the United States. Combine that with impending legislation and executive action to pursue “domestic extremists,” whom the Administration has also defined as “white supremacists,” it is not hard to imagine what kind of trouble is brewing.

“1.4.2. Global governance” from WEF’s book COVID-19: THE GREAT RESET, (June, 2020) is a confession of WEF’s business plan to establish a global top-down totalitarian communist government. The covid scam is presented as proof Americans need to renounce their national independence and surrender their democratic freedom.

1.4.2. Global governance p. 114

+ “The more nationalism and isolationism pervade the global polity, the greater the chance that global governance loses its relevance and becomes ineffective. Sadly, we are now at this critical juncture. Put bluntly, we live in a world in which nobody is really in charge.

+  COVID-19 has reminded us that the biggest problems we face are global in nature. Whether it’s pandemics, climate change, terrorism or international trade, all are global issues that we can only address, and whose risks can only be mitigated, in a collective fashion. … In a nutshell, global governance is at the nexus of all these other issues.

Therefore, the concern is that, without appropriate global governance, we will become paralyzed in our attempts to address and respond to global challenges, particularly when there is such a strong dissonance between short-term, domestic imperatives and long- term, global challenges. 

+ COVID-19 tells just such a story of failed global governance. From the very beginning, a vacuum in global governance, exacerbated by the strained relations between the US and China, undermined international efforts to respond to the pandemic…. In a functioning global governance framework, nations should have come together to fight a global and coordinated “war” against the pandemic. Instead the “my country first” response prevailed and severely impaired attempts to contain the expansion of the first wave of the pandemic…. WHO is infinitely preferable to a non-existent one, an argument that Bill Gates compellingly and succinctly made in a tweet: “Their work is slowing the spread of COVID-19 and if that work is stopped no other organization can replace them. The world needs @WHO now more than ever.”

+ This failure is not the WHO’s fault. The UN agency is merely the symptom, not the cause, of global governance failure. The WHO’s deferential posture towards donor countries reflects its complete dependence on states agreeing to cooperate with it. The UN organization has no power to compel information sharing or enforce pandemic preparedness. Like other similar UN agencies, for example on human rights or climate change, the WHO is saddled with limited and dwindling resources: in 2018, it had an annual budget of $4.2 billion, miniscule in comparison to any health budget around the world. In addition, it is at the perpetual mercy of member states and has effectively no tools at its disposal to directly monitor outbreaks, coordinate pandemic planning or ensure effective preparedness implementation at the country level, let alone allocate resources to those countries most in need. 

+This dysfunctionality is symptomatic of a broken global governance system, and the jury is out as to whether existing global governance configurations like the UN and the WHO can be repurposed to address today’s global risks. For the time being, the bottom line is this: in the face of such a vacuum in global governance, only nation states are cohesive enough to be capable of taking collective decisions, but this model doesn’t work in the case of world risks that require concerted global decisions.

+ The world will be a very dangerous place if we do not fix multilateral institutions. Global coordination will be even more necessary in the aftermath of the epidemiological crisis, for it is inconceivable that the global economy could “restart” without sustained international cooperation. Without it, we’ll be heading towards “a poorer, meaner and smaller world”.

In 1932-33, Communist Jews starved about ten million Ukrainian farmers and their families to death in a genocide called the “Holodomor.”  According to Deagle.com, the US population is projected to decline by 225 million by 2025. Canada, France and Italy will be reduced by about 30% but Russia, China, Iran & India will hardly be affected.  Germany and UK are reduced to 28 million and 15 million people respectively. 

The Rothschilds are making an inventory of everything on the planet so they may own it. This includes food. Ex FEMA analyst Celeste Solum implies that this inventory might facilitate food shortages aka “supply chain disruptions.” 

Back in 2005, the precursor to the Mark was introduced as a tracking mechanism for property and animals.  It was known as the National Animal Identification System. It had three pillars:

All property belongs to the government and will be issued an alpha-numeric country code.

Electronic identification of all lifeforms on said property each being issued an alpha-numeric country code24/7 surveillance

Courageous individuals and states introduced state legislation to block this intrusive regulatory proposal.  Despite widespread opposition it was passed.  A few years later becoming mandatory.  As is the custom in government circles, when it became mandatory, the program changes its name to Traceability to harmonize with the international mandate from the United Nations.  This program, from its inception, was applicable to humans as they are considered animals except in documents stating an exception. 

Here is a repost from Food Safety News updating you on the program.  It is critical to keep an eye on this as weaponized food was commanded and demanded in January by globalists, by the end of this year for all commercial available foods.

–“The Traceability Challenge”

“Tech-enabled traceability – the ability to quickly track a food throughout the food system, from when it leaves its source to when it lands on your plate – is one of the foundational core elements of the New Era of Smarter Food Safety blueprint.

“Achieving end-to-end food traceability will involve everyone in the supply chain – from source to table. To achieve that level of participation, we need accessible tracing solutions for human and animal food companies of all sizes.

“We’re asking food technology solution providers, public health advocates, entrepreneurs, and innovators across the human and animal food supply chain to present food traceability solutions that are affordable, create shared-value, and, thus, can scale to encourage widespread adoption.

“When there’s an outbreak of food-borne illnesses, it’s critical to rapidly identify where the contamination originated. Doing so not only helps us prevent additional illnesses and potentially save lives, but it allows us to conduct better root cause analyses to prevent such outbreaks from happening again. It also may provide us with more detailed or specific information about the source of the contamination.

“We also learned during the COVID-19 pandemic that further enabling a digitally traceable food system could help create the type of transparency needed to anticipate and help prevent supply chain disruptions in a public health emergency, thereby resulting in a more resilient food system.

“The challenge will invite submissions for tech-enabled solutions that address traceability needs and challenges faced by primary producers (such as entities involved in farming, fishing, and animal agriculture), importers, manufacturers and processors, distributors, and retailers and foodservice.
————

Deagle population projections. Black 2017.

The Pandemic is a Criminal Scam

Dr David Martin & Atty Dr Reiner Fuelmich on US Govt. Origins & Patenting of Corona Virus – Going Back 21 Years  

“Some people are making enormous amounts of money from this criminal enterprise… it is a delusion to believe the virus escaped from a Chinese laboratory and spread all over the world.” 

“What makes this even worse is that Dr Fauci in every board meeting of the NIAID between 2016 and 2019 lamented the fact that there wasn’t a way to make EVERYONE take a universal flu vaccine.” 

Dr. David Martin heads a company that monitors all patent applications to determine investment opportunities. 

There is nothing novel about the Corona virus as Dr Martin explains in this July 9 interview with lawyer Dr Reiner Fuelmich.

There are 73 patents covering every aspect of the virus going back 21 years. Some were filed as early as 2000. The CDC even paid extra money (from US taxpayers) to ensure some patents were not visible to public scrutiny. 

The script for this pandemic was written in 2004 at a conference called ‘Sars and Bioterrorism’, held on January 6th by Merck where the phrase ‘The New Normal’ was first coined and adopted by the WHO for the propaganda campaign, along with the idea of a universal vaccine.

Moderna knew they were slated to have a significant part to play in the development of the vaccine in March 2019 as they suddenly amended a series of failed patent filings; a very bizarre behaviour to specifically mention a ‘deliberate release’ of Corona virus. 

They amended four patents to begin the vaccine development. Moderna didn’t own all the technology which was a problem, so they negotiated with the two companies that owned this technology – Arbutus and Accuatus Pharmaceuticals who owned the lipid nano particle envelope process which delivers the mRNA fragment.

In November 2019, Moderna entered a research agreement with the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill to develop spike proteins to put inside the lipid nano particle for the vaccine. 

This was before the virus allegedly even “emerged” and therefore meant that a candidate vaccine had ALREADY existed for it.
What makes this even worse is that Dr Fauci in every board meeting of the NIAID between 2016 and 2019 lamented the fact that there wasn’t a way to make EVERYONE take a universal flu vaccine. 
But there was an ‘epithany’ with these amended patents in March 2019 in that:

What if there was ‘an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen?’

What is problematic here is that, the same phrase is used in a book called ‘A World At Risk’ written by the World Health Organization in September 2019, months before the virus emerged. 

It says we need a ‘coordinated global experience of a respiratory pathogen release ‘ which by September 2020 must have in place a universal capacity for public relations management, crowd control and the acceptance of a universal vaccine.

The video is deep and precise – which is great for anyone who wants to search for the truth of what is happening. It completely exposes the pandemic as a criminal scam and those with legal and evidence-based brains would find this information invaluable.

The video lasts for 1 hour 51 minutes and includes some German as Dr Fuellmich translates some of what Dr Martin is saying into German, presumably to be used as expert testimony in his legal challenge to the German Government. I hope he succeeds.

“Well if the people who produce and sell us music are going to put demons into every record and CD, why wouldn’t the people who produce our phones, tablets and iPads do the same thing?”

You see them everywhere – hunched forward and staring intently at their phone, tablet or iPad. 

You may have been in that position before yourself. I know I have. I also know there are many times when I find it extremely difficult to pull away from my device; times when

I’m compelled to keep my eyes on the screen, almost as if it’s a form of possession. 

Have you ever felt like that? It leads me to wonder if perhaps our phones and other devices are inhabited by demons.

A British pop band called The Police actually made an album about this called Ghost in the Machine. The band was fronted by Illuminati puppet Sting and the cover art for the album displays a hidden 666 message when viewed in a mirror. 
(Sting, Insider: “Anyone with their RIGHT hand hidden is just a BITCH…LEFT hand hidden HAS a direct connection to THE FAMILY…”)

There are songs on the album about demons and sorcery (Spirits in the Material World), trans-humanism (Rehumanize Yourself), and one world government (One World, Not Three). 

And this was way back in 1981, before anyone had ever heard of an iPhone. 

However, personal computers were just coming into use then. Was this album a premonition of things to come?

POP MUSIC DEMONIC?

It’s also worth remembering that Illuminati insider John Todd confirmed that the master recordings of every album and song are cursed and inhabited by demons. 

Well if the people who produce and sell us music are going to put demons into every record and CD, why wouldn’t the people who produce our phones, tablets and iPads do the same thing?

Look at Apple’s logo: an apple with a bite in it. That’s a direct symbol of defiance to God. 
It’s a little spooky to think that your phone might be haunted, might be possessed by a demon that is working non-stop on possessing you. 
Many will dismiss the idea completely with the thought that the people who run the world would never do such a thing. But I think the last year and a half has shown us just the opposite. 

Today there is talk of luciferase in the “vaccines.” Apparently, it’s a compound that works at destroying the “God gene” in every person. Are these jabs demon infested?

If you look at how 80% or more of the human race was bamboozled into a state of abject terror the last 18 months, it certainly does appear that most people are under a state of demonic possession. 

I don’t know how else to explain it. You could call in mass stupidity, but it appears to be much deeper than that.

Seeing the way most people are addicted to their phones, and the way most people receive their news of the world via their phones, tablets and iPads, then the idea of demon-infested devices doesn’t sound so farfetched. If that is the case, it helps to explain why the majority of the human race can be so easily manipulated. 

Something else to consider: the majority of people in the world are being led to sin and pornography via their phones. It’s yet another reason that leads me to wonder whether these devices are far sinister than they appear.

What do you think? Could there be a demon in your device?
———Mike Stone is the author of Based, a young adult novel about race, dating and growing up in America, and A New America, the first novel of the Alt-Right, a dark comedy set on Election Day 2016 in Los Angeles – – Available on Amazon.

Yes folks, there is an international conspiracy and it is all about “protecting” Israel. It operates through front and lobbying groups that uniquely promote the interests of a foreign country, Israel, even when those interests do serious damage to the host country where the lobbyists actually live. In Britain, for example, there are a Conservative Friends of Israel and a Labour Friends of Israel, comprising together 216 members of parliament and party officials. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been silent about Gaza apart from expressing “deep concern” and blaming both sides while Labour leader Keir Starmer, who has also been under pressure to say something, has focused on how four car loads of alleged Palestinian supporters in London may or may not have driven around shouting out “anti-Semitic” comments. Starmer, one recalls, ran on a leadership campaign pledging to root out “anti-Semitism” in the party as a response to previous leader Jeremy Corbyn’s apparently ill-advised public recognition that Palestinians are human beings. Also in Britain, contesting details of the standard narrative of the so-called holocaust can result in a large fine and even some jailtime.

In 2017, Al-Jazeera ran an undercover operation directed against various Israeli front groups in Britain and in the US which determined that officers from the respective Israeli Embassies, presumably intelligence linked, were meeting regularly with members of the alleged non-government organizations that had been set up to provide support for the Jewish state. In Britain, the interaction included explicit discussions on how to destroy the careers of politicians who were deemed to be insufficiently pro-Israeli. In the US the objective has been to disrupt the activities of pro-Palestinian groups, most particularly the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The pro-Israeli and anti-Arab initiatives were coordinated with and sometimes initiated by the Israeli Embassy officers, suggesting that they were actually intelligence operations.

That many American Jewish groups are collaborating directly with the Israeli Embassy raises two concerns. First, it is ipso facto a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which should require registration and complete transparency regarding one’s sources of income and interactions with the foreign embassy. And second, as many of the groups are in tax exempt status with the IRS as either charitable or educational foundations, that status should be rescinded given their foreign affiliation. Of course, the reality is that the Treasury Department has known all that and more for many years and has never taken any action relating to deceptive behavior by pro-Israel groups.

Elsewhere in Europe, “Holocaust denial” even if it only consists of challenging clearly fabricated “factual” details of the event can also land you in jail in Germany and France while criticizing the state of Israel is construed as anti-Semitism, a hate crime. Jewish groups have, in fact, promoted an official “International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance” (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism, which includes any criticism of Israel as a defining characteristic. The United States Department of State has accepted that definition and language.

Yes, the United States has an office of the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism and it is always headed by a Jew, as has been also the office in the Justice Department that continues to be dedicated to rooting out 90 year old Nazis. Meanwhile, the Republican Party, most particularly in its Trump version, is so close to Israel that it might reasonably be regarded as part of the Israel Lobby. And the Democrats are not much better, though there has been some dissent from progressives, which has led to the creation of a Zionist pressure group within the party called the Democratic Majority for Israel. It exists to defend Israel against any and all criticism while also protecting the billions of dollars and other benefits that the Jewish state receives from the US Treasury and government annually.

One might speculate that there is a whole federal government infrastructure devoted to Jewish and Israeli issues. How did that develop? Well, of course, money is what has made it happen. American politicians have notoriously always been easily corruptible, all it takes is a little cash. But no one is allowed to point out that obvious truth as linking Jews to money is regarded, by Jews and their captive media of course, as some kind of “anti-Semitic trope.”

Now it appears that a ceasefire is more-or-less in place but Israel’s ethnic cleansing that preceded its high-tech slaughter of Palestinian civilians who were being deliberately targeted has been perceived by the world, including many Americans, as particularly brutal. Which means the Zionist propaganda plus coercion machine has been working full time. Capitol Hill offices and the White House have no doubt been inundated with calls, emails and visits from constituents all singing the same song that was also being repeated by the President and Congress. It goes like this: “Israel is being attacked by Hamas terrorists and has a right to defend itself!” Sometimes there is a second verse which includes “The only democracy in the Middle East and America’s best friend and ally.”

Too bad that none of it is true, but the media also did its best to support the narrative by reporting how Hamas was launching “swarms” of rockets against Israel, making it appear as if a beleaguered Israel was valiantly defending itself against terrorist hordes. But the actual numbers told a different tale with only 12 Israelis killed after the violence erupted versus 232 Palestinians, including 65 children. Considerable infrastructure was also deliberately targeted and destroyed in Gaza versus limited damage in Israel while the calculated destruction of the building housing Associated Press (AP) and al-Jazeera should be seen as an attempt to eliminate any independent media observers on the ground in Gaza, even though AP predictably has hardly been critical of the Jewish state.

The Israel Lobby is, to be sure, expert at promoting and marketing its product. It is currently engaged in attacking celebrities and others who expressed any sympathy with the Palestinians while they were being slaughtered by the Israelis as anti-Semites. The larger and more openly combative Lobby groups like the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) have supporters in virtually every congressional district in the United States who can be called upon to get on the phone and start pouring out emails as needed. So every congress critter hears the call and knows what it means. And no one wants to have a hostile Israel Lobby on one’s back if there is any thought of being re-elected. In some cases, approaches include suggestions that significant donations to support one’s political campaign will either increase or be denied depending on what the legislator chooses to do or say.

And then there are the personal visits on Capitol Hill from the Israel lobbyists. The door is always open for the man or woman from AIPAC. Sometimes the Congressman is actually urged to sign a statement on his or her view of the conflict, a document carefully prepared in advance by The Lobby, of course. And the work by the Israel Firsters is almost always effective. Witness for example what took place concerning the assault on Gaza, where Congress and the White House tried to outdo each other in declaring how much they love Israel even though they don’t necessarily have to say or do anything as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did what he wanted anyway. Biden reportedly spoke with Netanyahu six times urging teethlessly “de-escalation” of the fighting but the Israeli each time insisted that he would continue the operation “mowing the grass” in Gaza until “its aim is met.”

The Israeli grip on the US government is and should be astonishing and one has to ask why the American people put up with it. They likely endure because they are unaware of the extent of it. If anyone still doubts the degree to which Jewish power is a major force in the United States it is only necessary as a test case to look at the Congressional and White House comments on Gaza, which served absolutely no American interest and which will only make the world even more anti-US due to the Administration’s enablement of the slaughter of the Palestinians. Washington’s UN Ambassador vetoed three Security Council resolutions calling for a cease fire, as is often the case, the only country to vote “no.”

Several aspects of the US role in the fighting particularly demonstrate the ability of Israel and its domestic lobby to get what they want from Washington even when it seems counterintuitive for the Administration and Congress to be falling in line. To be sure, 138 Congressmen and 29 Senators eventually signed onto letters urging a cease fire, but the texts tended to be generic, lacking any context, which means the recommendations were basically useless and not intended to go anywhere.

A highly partisan approach, in line with many of the comments by other government spokesmen, was reflected in a letter from Kevin McCarthy, the “leading Republican” (sic) in Congress, who released a statement confirming his allegiance to Israel. Part of it read:

“The ongoing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians show why America must act immediately to support Israel, condemn Hamas, and sanction those who fund terrorism. Instead of pressuring Israel to compromise with this terrorist group, Democrats should join Republicans in voting to cut off international funding for terrorists.

“That is why today, Rep. Brian Mast, a U.S. Army combat veteran who served alongside the Israel Defense Force (IDF), will push for a vote on the Palestinian International Terrorism Support Prevention Act of 2021.

“This bipartisan bill, which passed the House last Congress, would sanction foreign governments and individuals who fund Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, such as Iran.”

For starters, how exactly is it that a US Army combat veteran served alongside the Israeli Army? And now this great admirer of Israel is in Congress? Once upon a time one would lose US citizenship for serving in a foreign army. Mast must have missed something about swearing an oath to uphold the US Constitution, not Benjamin Netanyahu and his band of thugs and war criminals. And why are McCarthy and Mast including Iran in their indictment? Possibly because Tehran support of the Palestinian cause would be a pretext for another war? And what are McCarthy and Mast doing pledging anything at all to a foreign country which at the time was engaged in genocide?

Bad enough, but what is really appalling is the role of Joe Biden “the peacemaker” in hurriedly pushing through approval to provide the Israelis with $735 million dollars-worth of precision guided missiles, exactly the kind of weapon being used by Israel currently to kill Gazans. One might reasonably ask “What was Joe thinking?” but that raises the second question of “Was he thinking at all, apart from exercising knee jerk loyalty to Israel and its psychotic leader?” He did not have to provide more weapons to the Jewish state, which apparently was not running out of weapons of its own, but he did it anyway.

The United States already pays one fifth of Israel’s so-called “defense” budget and this extra contribution, as well as the funds provided annually to pay for Iron Dome defense, is on top of that. If there was any question whether the US was enabling the Israeli slaughter of Palestinians the question was surely answered by the decision made by the president, who knowingly provided US made weapons to be used by Israel to commit war crimes in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the US Arms Control Export Act and the existing Arms Supply Agreement between the US and Israel. He also was providing advanced tactical weapons to a country which is in violation of the Leahy Law due to its uninspected nuclear arsenal and is therefore ineligible for US government military assistance of any kind.

To be sure, some in Congress introduced a resolution to stop the weapons “sale” (a euphemism as Israel never pays for anything). Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib have proposed blocking the presidential authorization based on its one-sidedness and unsuitability when fighting is actually going on, but it was a futile gesture as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will surely let the bill die in committee. It will never reach the House floor for a vote. Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced a similar resolution in the Senate which will likely suffer the same fate.

Tlaib has argued that “The US cannot continue to give the right-wing Netanyahu government billions each year to commit crimes against Palestinians. Atrocities like bombing schools cannot be tolerated, much less conducted with US-supplied weapons. To read the statements [from the Biden Administration] you’d hardly know Palestinians existed at all. No child, Palestinian or Israeli, whoever they are, should ever have to worry that death will fall from the sky. How many of my colleagues are willing to say the same, to stand for Palestinian human rights as they do for Israel? How many Palestinians have to die for their lives to matter?”

So it is all same old, same old. Biden, who boasts that American ties to Israel are “unbreakable,” has welcomed the cease fire in Gaza but it is at best a pause in what has become generational intercommunal warfare based on Israeli intentions to eliminate the Palestinians. And Biden will even be seen as having provided the weapons to further that process. Americans, who have no compelling interest in being involved at all apart from their domination by a ruthless Israel Lobby on foreign policy issues relating to the Middle East, will pay the piper as they rearm the Israelis and enable the next round of killing. Some believe that the tide of public opinion is turning against Israel due to its brutality, but I have my doubts as the Lobby has been in control for so long and knows exactly which buttons to push to get what it wants. That, the subversion and corruption of American democracy, is the real tragedy.

The Second Amendment’s Right to Bear Arms: What It Means

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”—The Second Amendment to the US Constitution

You can largely determine where a person will fall in the debate over gun control and the Second Amendment based on their view of government and the role it should play in our lives.

In the first group are those who see the government as a Nanny State, empowered to look out for the best interests of the populace, even when that means overriding our rights as individuals and free will.

These individuals tend to interpret the Second Amendment to mean that only members of law enforcement and the military are entitled to own a gun. Case in point: President Biden recently (and wrongly) asserted that “the Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon.”

In the second group are those who see the government as inherently corrupt.

These individuals tend to view the Second Amendment as a means of self-defense, whether that involves defending themselves against threats to their freedoms or threats from individuals looking to harm them. For instance, eleven men were recently arrested for traveling on the interstate with unlicensed guns that were not secured in a case. The group, reportedly associated with a sovereign citizens group, claimed to be traveling from Rhode Island to Maine for militia training.

And then there is a third group, made up of those who view the government as neither good nor evil, but merely a powerful entity that, as Thomas Jefferson recognized, must be bound “down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” To this group, the Second Amendment’s assurance of the people’s right to bear arms is no different from any other right enshrined in the Constitution: to be safeguarded, exercised prudently and maintained.

How to exercise this right is the question that keeps jockeying for supremacy before the U.S. Supreme Court. After declaring more than a decade ago that citizens have a Second Amendment right to own a gun in one’s home for self-defense, the Court has now been tasked with deciding whether the Constitution also protects the right to carry a gun outside the home. The case, NY State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. Corlett, takes issue with a state law that requires a license in order to carry a concealed gun outside the home.

On the heels of Corlett is another legal challenge to the state’s authority to regulate—or ban outright—gun ownership outside the home. The attorneys general of 21 states—including Louisiana, Arizona, Montana, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming—have filed an amicus brief in Young v. Hawaii asking the Supreme Court to uphold Hawaiians’ Second Amendment rights to bear arms outside their homes.

Unfortunately, while the various federal circuit courts of appeal continue to disagree over the exact nature of the rights protected by the Second Amendment, the government itself has made its position extremely clear.

When it comes to gun rights in particular, and the rights of the citizenry overall, the U.S. government has adopted a “do what I say, not what I do” mindset. Nowhere is this double standard more evident than in the government’s attempts to arm itself to the teeth, all the while viewing as suspect anyone who dares to legally own a gun, let alone use one in self-defense.

Indeed, while it still technically remains legal to own a firearm in America, possessing one can now get you pulled over, searched, arrested, subjected to all manner of surveillance, treated as a suspect without ever having committed a crime, shot at, and killed. (This same rule does not apply to law enforcement officials, however, who are armed to the hilt and rarely given more than a slap on the wrists for using their weapons against unarmed individuals.)

Now the Biden Administration is setting its sights on gun control.

Mark my words: gun control legislation, especially in the form of red flag gun laws, which allow the police to remove guns from people “suspected” of being threats, will become yet another means by which to subvert the Constitution and sabotage the rights of the people.

Giving police the power to preemptively raid homes in order to neutralize a potential threat is a powder keg waiting for a lit match.

Under these red flag laws, what happened to Duncan Lemp—who was gunned down in his bedroom during an early morning, no-knock SWAT team raid on his family’s home—could very well happen to more people.

At 4:30 a.m. on March 12, 2020, in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic that had most of the country under a partial lockdown and sheltering at home, a masked SWAT team—deployed to execute a “high risk” search warrant for unauthorized firearms—stormed the suburban house where 21-year-old Duncan, a software engineer and Second Amendment advocate, lived with his parents and 19-year-old brother.

The entire household, including Lemp and his girlfriend, was reportedly asleep when the SWAT team directed flash bang grenades and gunfire through Lemp’s bedroom window.

Lemp was killed and his girlfriend injured.

No one in the house that morning, including Lemp, had a criminal record.

No one in the house that morning, including Lemp, was considered an “imminent threat” to law enforcement or the public, at least not according to the search warrant.

So what was so urgent that militarized police felt compelled to employ battlefield tactics in the pre-dawn hours of a day when most people are asleep in bed, not to mention stuck at home as part of a nationwide lockdown?

According to police, they were tipped off that Lemp was in possession of “firearms.”

Thus, rather than approaching the house by the front door at a reasonable hour in order to investigate this complaint—which is what the Fourth Amendment requires—police instead strapped on their guns, loaded up their flash bang grenades and acted like battle-crazed warriors.

This is what happens when you adopt red flag gun laws, which Maryland did in 2018, painting anyone who might be in possession of a gun—legal or otherwise—as a threat that must be neutralized.

Meanwhile, the government’s efforts to militarize and weaponize its agencies and employees is reaching epic proportions, with federal agencies as varied as the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration placing orders for hundreds of millions of rounds of hollow point bullets. Moreover, under the auspices of a military “recycling” program, which allows local police agencies to acquire military-grade weaponry and equipment, $4.2 billion worth of equipment has been transferred from the Defense Department to domestic police agencies since 1990. Included among these “gifts” are tank-like 20-ton Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, tactical gear, and assault rifles.

Ironically, while the Biden administration’s gun control efforts have helped to spike gun sales nationally, the government has made no effort to curtail its own addiction to weapons of war, a significant number of which have conveniently been “lost” and used in violent crimes in communities across the U.S.

We’re talking about rifles, pistols, machine guns, shot guns, and grenades. Some of these weapons were lost through gross negligence. Others, however, were trafficked by military police.

The U.S. military boasts weapons the rest of the world doesn’t have, and it continues to develop even more weaponry, each deadlier than the last.

Make no mistake: every last one of these weapons will eventually make its way back to domestic police forces to be used against the American people.

Included in the government’s military arsenal are armed, surveillance Reaper drones capable of reading a license plate from over two miles away; an AA12 Atchisson Assault Shotgun that can shoot five 12-gauge shells per second and “can fire up to 9,000 rounds without being cleaned or jamming”; an ADAPTIV invisibility cloak that can make a tank disappear or seemingly reshape it to look like a car; a PHASR rifle capable of blinding and disorienting anyone caught in its sights; a Taser shockwave that can electrocute a crowd of people at the touch of a button; an XM2010 enhanced sniper rifle with built-in sound and flash suppressors that can hit a man-sized target nine out of ten times from over a third of a mile away; and an XM25 “Punisher” grenade launcher that can be programmed to accurately shoot grenades at a target up to 500 meters away.

What the government has yet to acknowledge, however, is that its own gun violence—inflicted on unarmed individuals by battlefield-trained SWAT teams, militarized police, and bureaucratic government agents trained to shoot first and ask questions later—is not making America any safer.

Indeed, the U.S. government may be the most egregious perpetrator of gun violence in America, bar none.

All the while gun critics continue to clamor for bans on military-style assault weapons, high-capacity magazines and armor-piercing bullets, the U.S. military is passing them out to domestic police forces.

Under the auspices of a military “recycling” program, which allows local police agencies to acquire military-grade weaponry and equipment, more than $4.2 billion worth of equipment has been transferred from the Defense Department to domestic police agencies since 1990. Included among these “gifts” are tank-like, 20-ton Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, tactical gear, and assault rifles.

There are now reportedly more bureaucratic (non-military) government agents armed with high-tech, deadly weapons than U.S. Marines.

While Americans have to jump through an increasing number of hoops in order to own a gun, the government is arming its own civilian employees to the hilt with guns, ammunition and military-style equipment, authorizing them to make arrests, and training them in military tactics.

Among the agencies being supplied with night-vision equipment, body armor, hollow-point bullets, shotguns, drones, assault rifles and LP gas cannons are the Smithsonian, U.S. Mint, Health and Human Services, IRS, FDA, Small Business Administration, Social Security Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Education Department, Energy Department, Bureau of Engraving and Printing and an assortment of public universities.

This is the double standard at play here.

How is it that while violence has become our government’s calling card, from the more than 80,000 SWAT team raids carried out every year on unsuspecting Americans by heavily armed, black-garbed commandos and the increasingly rapid militarization of local police forces across the country to the drone killings used to target insurgents, “we the people” are the ones who must be regulated, restricted and banned from owning a weapon?

If we’re truly going to get serious about gun violence, why not start by scaling back the American police state’s weapons of war?

I’ll tell you why: because the government has no intention of scaling back on its weapons.

We’ve allowed ourselves to get so focused on debating who or what is responsible for gun violence—the guns, the gun owners, or our violent culture—and whether the Second Amendment “allows” us to own guns that we’ve overlooked the most important and most consistent theme throughout the Constitution: the fact that it is not merely an enumeration of our rights but was intended to be a clear shackle on the government’s powers.

When considered in the context of prohibitions against the government, the Second Amendment reads as a clear rebuke against any attempt to restrict the citizenry’s gun ownership.

As such, it is as necessary an ingredient for maintaining that tenuous balance between the citizenry and their republic as any of the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, especially the right to freedom of speech, assembly, press, petition, security, and due process.

Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas understood this tension well. “The Constitution is not neutral,” he remarked, “It was designed to take the government off the backs of people.”

In this way, the freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights in their entirety stand as a bulwark against a police state.

To our detriment, these rights have been steadily weakened, eroded and undermined in recent years. Yet without any one of them, including the Second Amendment right to own and bear arms, we are that much more vulnerable to the vagaries of out-of-control policemen, benevolent dictators, genuflecting politicians, and overly ambitious bureaucrats.

When all is said and done, the debate over gun ownership really has little to do with gun violence in America. It’s also not even a question of whether Americans need weapons to defend themselves against any overt threats to our safety or wellbeing.

Truly, the debate over gun ownership in America is really a debate over who gets to call the shots and control the game.

In other words, it’s that same tug-of-war that keeps getting played out in every confrontation between the government and the citizenry over who gets to be the master and who is relegated to the part of the servant.

The Constitution, with its multitude of prohibitions on government overreach, is clear on this particular point. As 20^th century libertarian Edmund A. Opitz observed in 1964, “No one can read our Constitution without concluding that the people who wrote it wanted their government severely limited; the words ‘no’ and ‘not’ employed in restraint of government power occur 24 times in the first seven articles of the Constitution and 22 more times in the Bill of Rights.”

In a nutshell, as I make clear in Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms reflects not only a concern for one’s personal defense, but serves as a check on the political power of the ruling authorities.

It represents an implicit warning against governmental encroachments on one’s freedoms, the warning shot over the bow to discourage any unlawful violations of our persons or property.

As such, it reinforces that necessary balance in the citizen-state relationship. As George Orwell, who plays a starring role in my new novel The Erik Blair Diaries, noted, “That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer’s cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”

Have you ever built a booby trap as a kid?

I thought so.

Today, you are going to learn how to build some REAL booby traps that have the potential to stop an intruder in its tracks.

Some of the booby traps listed here are also non-lethal and focused more as a warning system.

I am going to cover seven alarm system type traps and also five traps that are potentially deadly.

During the Vietnam war, traps have been used excessively by the native soldiers to break the morale of the invading US force.

Guess what happened next.

It worked.

Most of the fighting took place in dense forests which made it ideal for installing booby traps.

Enough history let’s get to the first trap which is the sonic tripwire.

Alarm System Boobie Traps

It does not matter if you are in your home or camping somewhere in the open; it is always a good idea to get a warning if someone is approaching your area.

In this section, I am going to cover seven warning type boobie traps that you can use. They are also non-lethal.

I will also provide a video with a short description of each method.

Sonic Tripwire

What you will need:

• A cheap alarm clock that has a loud beep.
• Braided or nylon fishing line.
• An old gift or credit card.
• Two strips of electrical wire.
• A piece of tin foil.
• Electrical tape.
• Laundry peg.
• Allen key.
• Glue.

Now that you have all of the ingredients for this boobie trap let’s put them all together. Here are 23 survival uses for honey that you didn’t knowabout.

Step 1. Connect the battery

Remove the battery from the alarm clock and attach the one end of the electrical wire to the spring contact point of the alarm which will come into contact with the positive end of the battery. Take the second wire and attach it to the positive side of the battery with the help of electrical tape.

Make sure that the electrical tape covers the positive end of the battery so that it does not come into contact with the spring point of the alarm. Place the battery back into the alarm clock in its original position.

Touch the opposite ends of the electrical wire together to complete the circuit. The alarm will start to ring once you do this. You can also replace the back cover of the alarm clock to make it look better.

Step 2. Create the tripwire switch

First, you need to glue two strips of tin foil to the jaws of the laundry peg. You then need to connect each point of the electrical wires to the backside of the jaw so that it comes into contact with the tin foil.

You can attach the wires onto the foil with the help of glue. Once you close the jaws of the laundry peg, the circuit will close and will result in the alarm to go off. You should open and close the peg several times to test it.

Step 4. Attach the peg and Allen key onto the alarm

Now that your setup is almost complete, you can start to glue the laundry peg onto the top of the alarm. You should also attach the Allen key to the bottom of the alarm which will allow you to anchor the system onto almost anything.

You can use cable ties, some duct tape or wire to attach this device to almost anything. If you want to camouflage the alarm clock then you have the option to spray it another color.

New Survival Energy Product Makes Every Window A Powerful Solar Charger

Step 5. Create your trigger pin

You were probably wondering where the old credit card comes into play? Now you will learn more on the role it is going to play.

Cut out a small square out of the credit card and punch a hole into that piece. Attach the string or fishing line to the credit card by threading it through the hole and tying it accordingly.

Now that you have the trigger pin, you should place it between the jaws of the laundry pin to disturb the connection of the circuit. Once someone triggers the trip wire or fishing line, the trigger pin will slip out, and the circuit will be completed which will activate the alarm.

Using A Mouse Trap

Materials needed:

• Mousetrap.
• Permanent marker.
• Ring caps.
• Glue.
• Fishing line.

To build this trap, you can use everyday household items, but you might want to buy some ring caps which will intensify the noise.

Step 1. Mark a line

Take a permanent marker and mark out a line where the hammer is supposed to be in the resting position. If you do not have a permanent marker, you can pull back the hammer and allow it to hit the wood a couple of times which will leave a mark.

Step 2. Glue on some ring caps (optional)

This step is optional because the mousetrap alone might make enough noise. If the sound is too soft for you and you would like to intensify it, then you can add some ring caps. Ring caps are those small red plastic rings which will simulate the noise from a gunshot when triggered.

You should at least add two ring caps, or you can fill the whole line. It will all depend on the volume you desire.

Step 3. Modify the trigger

The next step is to modify the trigger by attaching some fishing line to it. The fishing line will act as the trip wire and will release the trigger when pulled.

When the trigger is released the hammer will hit the ring caps and make a considerable noise. You can attach this trap to doors and also the floor. As long as you have an imagination, the possibilities are limited.

Boat Horn Tripwire

This trap is also very useful and will make a big noise. It is straightforward to make and does not require any craftsmanship.

What you will need:

• Small portable boat horn.
• Electrical tape.
• Small rock.
• A short stick.
• Fishing line. 
• A Flat rock or brick.

Step 1. Extending the button

The type of boat horn that I would recommend is the small and portable version with a button/trigger on top. Instead of your finger, a large brick or rock with a flat surface will trigger the noise.

It is because of this reason, why the button needs to be extended. You can put a small rock which is smaller than the surface area of the button on top of it and use electrical tape over the button so that the pebble will not fall off and stay in place.

Step 2. Digging a small hole

The rock needs to fall at nearly a 180° angle for it to trigger the horn. Depending on the height of the horn, you will need to dig a shallow hole for it to be shorter so that the rock can fall on the trigger at the preferred angle.

Step 3. Setting up the trap

Now you should place the rock over the horn while supporting the one side with a short stick. The stick will allow the rock to rest on it. You can also break off small pieces of the stick to adjust its length.

Attach the fishing line to the bottom end of the stick while the rock is resting on it. Once the tripwire is triggered, the rock will fall on the horn which will make a noise.

Keychain Alarm Trip Wire

This alarm is the easiest and most effective DIY trigger alarm that you can build. It is deafening, but the keychain alarm might cost you some money upfront. Many people use this item for self-defense to scare off potential attackers.

• At least 130 decibels keychain alarm.
• A piece of wire or cable ties.
• Hammer and nails.
• Fishing line.

Step 1. Attach fishing line to trigger pin

When buying a keychain alarm, make sure you get one which makes use of a trigger pin that must be pulled out for the alarm to sound otherwise it will not work.

Attach the fishing line to the pin and move onto the next step.

Step 2. Attach the keychain alarm to something

There are no set rules as to where you should set this device as long as you can attach it to something to provide enough support for the pin to be pulled out.

If you have a wooden porch, you can attach it with the help of a hammer and some nails. You can also connect it to the leg of a table with wire, rope and even cable ties.

Now you are set, and the alarm will go off once someone triggers the trip wire.

Tin Can Bell Alarm 

This method is the cheapest to do and is also low tech which means it does not require batteries or electricity to work. You can use this method while camping, bugging out and even at your home.

Here is what you will need:

• You need 4 to 5 empty cans.
• Paracord rope or something else with similar strength.
• Two sticks.
• And a “V” fork shaved tree.

Step 1. Find a “V” shaped tree

If you do not know how one of these trees look like, you can have a look at the video above. It is a tree where the trunk splits into two starting from the ground.

Tie the paracord rope between the two trunks so that you can hang the cans from the center of it.

Step 2. Hanging the cans

You can start by taking your knife to make a small hole near the opening of each can. By creating a hole in each can, you can attach a rope to it. You can also connect the rope to the tabs of the cans.

Once this is finished, you should attach the end of each rope together so that the cans can come into contact with one another.

Step 3. Winding up the trigger stick

Once the cans are hanging, you can now wind up the stick which will trigger them. To do this, you need to place and tie a paracord rope around the base of the two trunks just below the cans.

The rope will now be like a loop around the tree. Just make sure that it is not very tight. Take a stick and put it in between the loop that you created and start to wind it up.

This process should be done until enough tension has built up. Make sure the stick is high enough to hit the cans.

Step 4. Placing the release stick

Now that your stick is set up and there is enough tension built up, you need to keep it in place so that it does not go off automatically. You can do this with the help of a trigger stick.

The trigger stick will be placed horizontally behind the tension stick to keep it in place. Once this stick is released, the trigger stick will start to spin and trigger the cans which will make a noise.

Step 5. Setting up the tripwire

It is important not to choose a brightly colored tripwire when setting up a trap. Choose a color which will blend in with the surrounding colors.

The most popular color for tripwires is black. Tie the tripwire to the release stick and span it across the floor.

Once a person or animal triggers the tripwire, it will pull the release stick out of position. This action will cause the trigger stick to release its tension which will result in ti hitting the cans.

Party Popper Alarm

When partying time is over, and it is time to get serious, then a party popper can play a role in an early detection system. This method is also very straightforward to use.

Usually, these devices can only be used once, so you need to work sparingly with them if you have limited supply. If you want to buy a party popper for this purpose, then you need to make sure you get those with the pullable string.

All you then need to do is to tie a tripwire to the string and then set it up somewhere. The trigger mechanism is already sorted, but the biggest challenge comes to setting up this alarm system.

The party popper needs to be in a fixed position so that enough counter force is available for the string to be pulled out.

The shape of the party popper also makes it a challenge to be fixed. Below, I will give you two tips on how to set up this device.

Materials used:

• Party popper.
• Fishing line or rope.
• Two small sticks.

Method 1. Tying it up to something.

If you have some extra rope, then you can tie the party popper up to something. You can tie it up to the branch of a tree or the foot of a table. You can also plant a stick into the ground and tie it up that way.

Method 2. Setting it between two planted sticks.

For this method to work, you need to make use of a champagne party popper. It will work because it comes in the shape of a bottle which is wide but get narrower in the direction of the string.

Plant two sticks next to each other with enough space so that only the neck of the party popper fits through. Make sure the sticks are planted deep enough so that it will create enough resistance.

Talking Boobie Trap

There are few instances more frightening than hearing a random voice when you are snooping around someone else’s stuff.

What if you could make some trap which will activate a voice over once triggered?

It sounds like an excellent idea.

This trap is a little more sophisticated than most and requires you to buy a recording module.

Materials needed:

• Recording module.
• Tin foil.
• Plastic cap.
• Zip Ties.
• Rubber bands.
• Duct tape or aluminum tape.
• Double sided tape.
• Batteries.
• Superglue.
• Laundry pin.

Step 1. Configuring the laundry pin

The laundry pin will be the starting point on which the device will be built upon. But first, you need to take it apart.

Remove the spring and then flip it over so that it acts as a pivot or fulcrum. Next, you need to take the rubber band and wrap it around the pin near the middle inside the groove.

Take the tin foil and wrap it around the jaws of the pin. Make sure the tin foil is decently wrapped so that the point of contact in the inside is covered.

The pin has two purposes which are the foundation of which this device is built upon and also as the switch.

Once the two jaws covered by the foil come together, they will complete the circuit and activate the recording module.

Step 2. Connecting the wires

The recording module needs to be connected to the switch with the help of wires. You need to start by attaching the pair of wires to the jaws of the pin.

You can attach the wires with the help of duct tape of aluminum tape. Connect the wires on the outside of each jaw so that you do not disturb the circuit.

Step 3. Customizing the recording module

Make yourself familiar with the device and test it to learn how it works. Start by recording a short sentence with your voice.

You can say almost anything as long as it will deter the person responsible from triggering the device from snooping around in your stuff.

You can test and glue the plastic cap onto the speaker to amplify the noise. Next, you might want to remove the switch on the circuit board because the pin which you created will replace it.

There will be two wires visible which should be connected to the wires from the pin.

When you are finished, you should test the device to see if it works. If it does not work, then you should exchange the wires.

Step 4. Assembling the trap

You can use either double sided tape or zip ties to connect all of the pieces. Start by stacking the battery on top of the laundry pin, and then put the small circuit board on top.

On top of the circuit board, you want to place the speaker. Once everything is stacked on one another, you can use zip ties for reinforcement.

Step 5. How to use it

Using the trap is simple.

The switch will be activated once the weight or pressure is released which allow the jaws to come into contact with one another.

This device is triggered by weight and can be effectively used if you want to warn someone to put something down which is yours.

Deadly Outdoor Boobie Traps

Warning!!! (Using At Your Own Risk)

The traps in this section are potentially dangerous and also illegal to build or install in and around your house. The traps in this section are for informational purposes only.

Frequently, you will find irresponsible people that will install these traps randomly in public areas which can severely cripple innocent civilians.

Using these traps should only be recommended when you are faced with total anarchy or lawlessness as a last resort to defend yourself or your property from people that intent to harm you and your family.

Noose Trap

Depending on the size, you can catch almost anything including small animals, deer and also people. The size of the “prey” will depend on the strength of the noose, the height and even the mass of the counterweight.

Here is what you will need:

• Sturdy rope (preferably paracord).
• Two peg shaped sticks.
• One long stabilizer stick.
• Trigger stick.
• Heavy Counterweight.

The video above will show you exactly how to set it up. Make sure to set this trap next to a trail under a large tree.

The counterweight must be heavier than the prey for it to work. The two peg shaped sticks should be planted deep enough so that the weight of the counterweight does not pull it out.

The reason why I chose to use a paracord rope is that it is very strong and durable. Also, make sure to cover this trap with leaves and branches to make it less visible.

Punji Stick Traps

Punji traps, in general, are one of the deadliest traps that you will ever encounter. They come in different sizes and types. The type I am going to discuss now is the punji stick trap.

All punji traps make use of the victims own weight to cause harm to them. It is done by digging a hole and then planting spikes inside. The hole is then covered with branches to make it invisible.

Once the person steps on this trap, they will fall into the hole where the spikes will penetrate their flesh.

Materials used:

• Six pencil thick hardwood sticks.
• A trusty knife.
• A shovel.

You should start by collecting sticks that are straight and also the thickness of your pinky. The number of sticks will depend on the size of the hole.

Take a sharp knife and remove the bark from each stick. This process will reduce the friction which will allow for deeper penetration.

You can also trim the stick with your knife until it is straight. Once it is straightened and trimmed, you can shape the pointy ends. Some people also like to burn the tips and then sharpen them to make them harder.

Next, you want to dig a hole with the help of a shovel or digging stick. The hole should be around two feet deep. The deeper the hole, the further will the victim fall which will create even deeper wounds.

Place the sticks out evenly inside the hole and cover the surface area with thin and leafy branches.

There is no limit as to how deep or wide the hole should be.

Spring Spear Trap

This is another deadly trap that can cause puncture wounds when activated. This trap can easily be made in the woods as the materials needed are very primitive.

The height can be adjusted according to the type of animal that you want to catch. This trap makes use of tension that is being built up when a branch is pulled backward.

Materials needed:

• One long wet flexible branch.
• A couple of shorter wooden sticks.
• A rope.
• A trusty knife.
• Strong tree.

You should find a location next to the trail where there is a tree that has multiple trunks growing from the ground. The one end of the long and thick branch will be placed between the two trunks and then pulled backward which will create tension.

It is time to create the trap once you found a suitable location. Next, you need to get your hands on a stick that is one foot in length and also as thick as your thumb.

Take your knife and skin the bark from it. You should also create a pointy end which will do the damage. You can use one or two of these sticks but not more than three.

Create a notch on both the puncture and tension stick and then connect it by tying it with a rope. Take two more sticks or pegs and plant them on both sides of the trail.

The peg closest to the tree will have a trigger stick attached to it. Attach a rope on the opposite peg with a small loop on end. Make sure the rope is long enough to reach the other end because it will function as the tripwire.

The video above will show you how to create the trigger mechanism in full.

The Spiked Board

Another great way to scare away pesky intruders is to plant a spiked board in front of your door. All you need is a wooden board, some nails, and a hammer.

Make sure the nails are longer than the thickness of the board so that it can extend one centimeter or more.

Hammer a couple of nails through the board and you have a boobie trap in your hands. It may not be lethal but can cause severe puncture wounds through the sole of a person’s foot.

Kleptsy Trap

This trap can be used to hunt smaller animals, larger ones such as deer which also includes intruders.

It follows the same principle as the spring spear trap but uses a different trigger and tension mechanism.

The good thing about this trap is that it works independent and you do not need a tree to set it up. You can place it almost anywhere.

Materials needed:

• A couple of sticks.
• A string of rope.
• A trip wire.

First, you need to choose an area where you want to plant this trap. Take two thick and strong sticks and plant them into the ground near the trail.

The length of the sticks planted will depend on how high you want the trap to be. The higher the trap, the larger the potential target.

Tie a rope around these two sticks which will help provide tension to the arm when coiled. The arm will have two spikes which are also made out of sticks.

The points of the spikes can be burned to make them harder. Place the arm between the two ropes and start to wind it up.

The trigger mechanism will be made out of a notched stick which is planted at the back of the trap. The tripwire will run from the trigger stick below the trap to the opposite side of the trail connected to another planted stick.

Watch the video above to see the boobie trap in action.

Final Word

When setting up a boobie trap, make sure you choose the right location. Some boobie traps require a tree to work. You should also consider planting a trap next to a trail where most of the activity will be.

Some of the materials used are household items while some need to be purchased. Some more advanced traps will take some practice from your side to set them up correctly.