When Donald Trump suggested renaming Fort Bragg after Al Sharpton, it was a punchline. Contrary to the former Presidents wishes, ten Army posts named after Confederate generals are to be renamed. Trump’s joke could well be prophetic. To guess what kind of names the powers that be might go for, we can look to the Navy. Military ships have historically been named after warriors and Presidents. Breaking with tradition, the Navy has named a whole class of vessel after civil rights leader John Lewis. Each ship is being named after a civil rights figure. The USNS Harvey Milk, for example, is named after the first openly gay elected official in California (who also happened to be a long time supporter of Jim Jones, leader of a mass suicide cult). Other ships in the John Lewis class include Robert Kennedy; Lucy Stone, a suffragette; Sojourner Truth, an abolitionist; and Earl Warren, a former US Supreme Court justice. Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus said it was “important to recognize those who fought in a different way, who fought for the ideals we value as a country.”

John Lewis died in 2020. At his eulogy, Barack Obama dubbed Lewis “a founding father” of a “fuller, fairer, better America”. In that most tumultuous of years, statues of America’s real founding fathers had been pulled from their pedestals. Of the “relentless young people” responsible for widespread rioting, looting, and arson, Obama said, “John, those are your children”. The new fuller fairer America demands new symbols. According to one poll, many liberals would like to replace the stars and stripes with a flag that “better reflects our diversity as a people”. In many ways, that’s already happened: the rainbow ensign flies on military vehicles, on embassy buildings, and every redoubt of American domination. Secretary of State Antony Blinken authorized diplomatic outposts to fly the Pride flag on the same flagpole as the U.S. flag – not just for pride month, but all year round. Blinken also authorized U.S. embassies to fly BLM flags and banners.

Latinx girlboss imperialism

“I can change a diaper with one hand and console a crying toddler with the other…I am a woman of color. I am a cisgender millenial who has been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. I am intersectional… I am a walking declaration… I refuse to internalise misguided patriarchal ideas about what a woman can or should be.”

This is the face of the modern CIA. Significantly, this video series was a recruitment drive — these are the sort of people the CIA actively wants to hire. After proudly stating her race, sex, gender identity and psychological disorders, she claims to be “more than a box-checking exercise”. This proud “daughter of immigrants” wears a T-shirt emblazoned with a raised fist. It was but one in a series of such videos entitled Humans of the CIA. In another video from the series a man of indeterminate racial origin tells the camera that his experience as a “chief of corporate strategy and education for diversity and inclusion” was great preparation for his career in the CIA. The CIA recruitment drive has heavily targeted people of color. The official CIA Instagram account features a black recruit wearing a hoody emblazoned with the words “WE ARE BLACK HISTORY” above an image of the African continent. White males are now entirely absent from recruitment material. That’s hardly surprising, given that John Brennan, former Director of the CIA, told MSNBC “I’m increasingly embarrassed to be a white male these days”. Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence in the Biden administration, has referred to “diversity, inclusion, equity” as “mission imperatives” that are “quickly emerging as one of the top national security issues of our time”. If the case of Jonathan Pollard is anything to go by, the total opposite is the case. Minorities are liable to leak classified information to their co-religionists or to their ancestral country of origin in a way that non-hyphenated Americans aren’t.

Woke washing?

Many view the adoption of woke rhetoric as a charade, as little more than a shallow PR exercise. Glenn Greenwald, talking on the Zero Books podcast, referred to it as “an incredibly cynical branding weapon”:

“In 2015 the British spy agency GCHQ announced LGBT day. Their headquarters were bathed in the colors of the rainbow flag, trying to put this pretty liberal-left face on this militaristic institution. You see this over and over now where every major authoritarian institution of militarism and corporatism now drapes themselves in identity politics and woke ideology… Its all about deceiving you into believing that these institutions are kind and gentle and noble and loving and fair because their weaponising identity politics to distract you from the reality of what neoliberalism and imperialism are.”

Greenwald is partly correct. A CIA file released by Wikileaks talked of “tailoring messaging” to contain a backlash against the war in Afghanistan. The CIA perfected such messaging to, in their own words, ensure Western publics would be “better prepared to tolerate a spring and summer of greater military and civilian casualties”. The agency knew the obvious, that war brings death, and America justified the bodies by building a few girls schools in the wreckage. Education for girls has become the most effective propaganda tool in justifying a bloody, long-running, ruinously expensive, and utterly pointless conflict. In a 2001 radio address, Laura Bush declared the “the fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women in Afghanistan”. Twenty years later, a CNN headline ran, “Concerns mount that US withdrawal from Afghanistan could risk progress on women’s rights”. According to a report by Vox, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley made an “emotional” case for keeping troops in Aghanistan, arguing that women’s right would “go back to the Stone Age” if America withdrew. Milley himself has acknowledged that “We have been in a condition of strategic stalemate where the government of Afghanistan was never going to militarily defeat the Taliban”, so assumably wants to keeps troops on the ground forever.

The American media has picked up the talking point. The Washington Post editorial board acknowledge that withdrawal “may spare the United States further costs and lives” but still objected on the grounds that it would be a disaster for the countries women and a reversal of “social progress”. Writing in that same paper, Max Boot asked readers to think of “all the women in the workforce”. The United States must drop cluster bombs on the heads of female civilians in Afghanistan in order to protect their human rights. Shrapnel from NATO munitions will rip through female flesh, spreading female empowerment in its wake. After the invasion, American media outlets celebrated such achievements as the first female tattoo artist opening a studio in Kabul. That, apparently, is what we were fighting for.

We are repeatedly prompted to celebrate the first – the first female CIA director, the first black Secretary of Defense. Joe Biden explained that he chose Lloyd Austin, who is African American, to join “our diverse national-security leadership team” as Secretary of Defense because he “reflects the lived experiences of all Americans”. Austin should have been a controversial choice. Up until his appointment he was serving on the board of Raytheon, one of the largest arms manufacturers. Rather than decry the military industrial complex we’re encouraged to celebrate the first black man to fill the role. It was “another milestone”, said the Atlantic magazine. Militarism is being rebranded as feminist, LGBTQ, and anti-racist. Mieke Eoyang, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy at the DoD, responded to white progressive critics of Susan Rice and Michele Flournoy: “training their fire on women of color who are under consideration to lead the national security departments makes me deeply uncomfortable about their allyship to those communities. Especially when the national security community is dominated by white men”. Both women have a track record of supporting catastrophic wars, but US imperialism can now be covered up and bolstered with claims of racism, sexism, and any number of phobias. Israel pioneered what’s been deemed ‘pink-washing’, using homosexual libertinism as a weird marker of civilized values as opposed to the barbarism of Muslim Arabs. Black faces in high places have been rather effective at minimising criticism of US foreign policy. War hawks have long wielded charges of anti-Americanism as a cudgel. Now their critics can be deemed anti-American and racist. Even Muammar Gaddafi was won over by Barack Obama, whom he designated “an exceptional case…being a black African his mentality is different to that of the Yankees.” Soon after that comment Gaddafi would be sodomised to death with a bayonet after a U.S. military intervention. Obama and Susan Rice were a black face for the same old militarism. The anarchy they unleashed on Libya remains to this day.

Politically correct rhetoric is often deployed to advance pre-existing American foreign policy. As Darren Beattie has pointed out, what he terms the Globalist American Empire has used minority groups “to advance its power objectives geopolitically (Uiguhrs, Rohinga) – and women and gays to mobilize color revolution protests in Eastern Europe and Thailand”. Warmongering is now often wrapped in a rainbow flag. Richard Grenell was the first openly gay person to serve at Cabinet level, appointed by Trump as Director of National Intelligence. In a campaign ad Grenell bragged that the then-President “fully supported our fight to crush the homophobic and barbaric Islamic terrorist organization Hezbollah and the Iranian regime that supports them.” One imagines the recipients of military-industrial largesse would latch onto any pretext for war. Wokeness may just be a handy way to propagandize for wars they would want to fight regardless.

It’s easy to be cynical about the American elites self-proclaimed values. This is the same elite that maintains the closest of ties with Saudi Arabia. One could dismiss the rhetoric as hot air, as disingenuous marketing spin. The high-minded moral indignation might ring rather hollow but do not underestimate the human capacity to truly and deeply believe our own self-serving bullshit. Human beings are fully capable of sincere inconsistency. Rank hypocrisy doesn’t disprove underlying values.

For a growing number of Americans though, wokeness isn’t a cynical and insincere means to an end, its a fanatical cult. What’s going on here is more than the adoption of some silly neologisms. This is not just a matter of style. It is not just performative. It is far more than a branding exercise. Every facet of American power has signed-on to the woke agenda. Critical race theory is the new governing ideology of the American empire and the implications of that are profound. Anybody with any sense of history will be aware of just how harshly America treats its ideological enemies. In Indonesia, up to one million civilians were slaughtered for communist sympathies with the full support of the United States. The vast security apparatus set up to fight the Cold War was never disbanded, it just found new targets. In 2021 the budget for the Department of Defense is 705.4 billion dollars. What happens when the influence of that money meets the influence of woke dogma?

The CIA and the Cultural Cold War

Far from cynically co-opting wokeness, the CIA were early investors. In 1950’s the CIA established the International Organisations Division. It’s cultural influence was huge. Looking back after the end of the Cold War, Tom Braden, chief of the IOD, described it as “the most important division that the agency had”. Some of the best-known publications of the Democratic Left (Encounter, New Leader, Partisan Review), were funded by the CIA. The goal of the Agency was to reorientate the left around anti-Soviet liberalism, and in that, they wholly succeeded. The Agency also funded influential feminist Gloria Steinem. Steinem described the Agency as, “completely different from its image”. She was “amazed to discover” that the CIA was full of “enlightened liberal non-partisan activists of the sort who characterized the Kennedy administration”. According to the ex-director of the CIA William Colby, the covert nature of the programme was necessitated by the “very retrograde people” in Congress.

In 1976, decades before becoming Director of the CIA, John Brennan voted for Communist Party nominee Gus Hall. One of the most prominent members of the Party at the time was Angela Davis, who went on to stand as their VP candidate. Davis was a student of Herbert Marcuse, who had served in the Office of Strategic Services (the forerunner to the CIA) and the State Department. Decades later, Davis would be a key influence on the founders of Black Lives Matter. I don’t know if Brennan was ever an Angela Davis fan, maybe he just liked Soviet economics, but his Twitter account reveals a man whose taken a giant gulp of the identity politics cool-aid. In the middle of deadly riots, Brennan tweeted: “National outrage about racial discrimination, hateful bigotry, & injustice of unequal opportunity is necessary for real change”. He blamed the violence of BLM on “injustice & economic inequity fuelled by people like Trump”. Throughout Trump’s presidency his Twitter feed consisted of non-stop accusations of Trumps “reckless jingoism”. Donald Trump is responsible for “fascism” and leading a “dangerous alliance” of “right wing extremists” and “malevolent bigots”, according to Brennan. He supported racial narcissist Colin Kaepernick. This was the man who had the power to launch coups and to massage and wholly invent ‘intelligence’. Significantly, John Brennan made his Gus Hall admission at a forum on Increasing Diversity in the Intelligence Community, to ensure black potential recruits that their activism wouldn’t be a bar to admission.

One of his predecessors, Michael Hayden, made an attack ad against Donald Trump, blasting him for not listening to experts: “Truth is really important, but especially in intelligence… The FBI says white nationalism is a real problem, and the FBI wants to do something about it, but the President doesn’t want to talk about that”. It’s a rather galling sentiment coming from somebody that worked under George W. Bush (Bush himself now spends his free time painting portraits lionizing immigrants). In reality, most white supremacist terror threats are make-work creations of the FBI — see, for example, The Base honeypot and the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping hoax. Obese FBI officers literally kneel before Black Lives Matter. What Michael Hayden himself termed “the permanent government” has made patriotic white people the new Muslims. When Michael Hayden isn’t fantasizing about adding Edward Snowden to a drone kill list he’s on Twitter calling Tucker Carlson “a dirty pig!”, “white supremacist”, “asshole” watched by “Nazis” on “Der Sturmer TV”, comparing the Georgia GOP to the KKK and claiming the economy would collapse without “undocumented workers”. While a legitimate critique of Trump and Trumpism could be voluminous, the Never Trump movement of former Republicans — which has always included the most fervent supporters of war, many of whom remain closely tied the National Security State — has so often expressed opposition to Trump as opposition to fascism.

The military-industrial complex goes woke

A video from the Department of Defense explains how the Army prepared a young black woman “for a career as a beauty influencer and diversity activist with millions of social media followers”. Rather than recruiting strong young men who might be useful in a war, the American military is desperate to recruit people obsessed with nail varnish, hair extensions, and racism. Women in the military can now wear nail polish, lipstick and earings in the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion”. An army recruitment video features a gay rights march and a lesbian wedding. A young female soldier “who operates your nations patriot missile defense systems” narrates her story: “It begins in California with a little girl raised by two moms…I also marched for equality. I’ve been defending freedom from a young age.” This tells us what the America army is fighting for: first she defended freedom by marching at a gay rights parade, now she defends that same freedom with patriot missiles.

The best way to predict the future of American military is to look at West Point, the elite military academy that has produced such prominent figures as Ulysses S Grant, Douglas MacArthur and Dwight Eisenhower. In 2016, sixteen black female cadets at West Point took a graduation photo with raised fists — a gesture commonly associated with the Black Power movement. In 2017 Ta-Nehisi Coates was invited to give a lecture to 800 cadets. Coates ouvre is defined by unbridled racial paranoia expressed in the fruitiest of language: he has severe doubts about whether white Americans can “erect a democracy independent of cannibalism”. Cadets and faculty met on multiple occasions “to consider the implication of Coates’s contributions for future Army officers”. In 2020, in the wake of George Floyds death, a group of students at the academy created an extensive policy proposal titled An Anti-Racist West Point. Notable in their demands: “demolish Reconciliation Plaza”. Wanting to tear down statues that celebrate the confederacy is one thing, but wanting to tear down a monument to peace is telling: these people will brook no dissent — enemies must be wholly destroyed. These are literal social justice warriors, ready to kill and maim for the cause.

Mike Waltz, who sits on the U.S. House Armed Services Committee, has brought to light workshops about “racist dogwhistles” and lectures with titles like “Understanding White Rage”. This sort of diversity training is nothing new. David Cole recounts his experiences with the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI), which teaches that you’re a racist if you believe, regarding violent crime, “people of color attack white people too.”

The Pentagon is entirely obsessed with diversity. Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby declared during a news briefing that the military is “the greatest the world has ever seen because of its diversity”. The U.S. Air Force describes diversity as a “force multiplier”. In 2009 Army major Nidal Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar” and opened fire at Fort Hood, killing thirteen people. General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, argued in the aftermath that while the deaths were tragic “it would be a greater tragedy if diversity became a casualty here”. Diversity matters to the Pentagon more than American lives.

It’s not just the military itself that’s been radicalised. The whole defense industry is drenched in a miasma of anti-white vitriol. Lockheed Martin, America’s largest defense contractor, sent senior white male executives on a three-day diversity training program to deconstruct their “white male culture”. A free association exercise listed connotations for the term white men, with the trainers offering: KKK, Aryan Nation, can’t jump, old, privileged, and racist. They were asked to read a long series of “I’m tired” statements from people of colour such as “I’m tired of the concept that we should be colorblind” and “I’m tired of people disparaging our campaigns, like Black Lives Matter”. The entirety of corporate America, including its gargantuan defence industry, wants total unquestioning ideological assent.

Where America goes, its allies follow. NATO released a video advertising their belief that “diversity is our strength.” The Permanent Secretary of Britain’s Ministry of Defence sent emails to staff that claimed “systemic racial inequality is not unique to America but also has deep roots within UK society, including Defence” before signing off with #BlackLivesMatter.

The purge

The Capitol protest was a Reichstag fire moment – an event blown out of all proportion to justify the seizure of power. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered a 60-day stand-down to “address extremism across DoD”. The term “extremism” is a useful one – it sounds politically neutral and non-partisan. But what counts as an extremist? In a report by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), alongside the typical groups – the KKK, Aryan Nations – sat more benign examples. Signs of extremism used to purge the ranks included depictions of Pepe the Frog, a cartoon character used by Donald Trump in his 2016 election campaign. A flag with the words “Come and take it” — used by second amendment activists — was another marker of extremism. According to a report in The Intercept, the Pentagon is launching a pilot program to “continuously” monitor the social media of military personal for non-PC sentiments. The man in charge of the ideological vetting operation is Bishop Garrison, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense for Diversity and Inclusion. In a bout of catastrophizing paranoia, Garrison referred to racism and white nationalism as a “nation-ending” threat to America and an “existential threat to our country”. His definition of white nationalism is broad enough to include Jewish Trump aide Stephen Miller, of whom he claimed “we’re being destroyed without a single round being fired”. By redefining political opponents as a national security threat, radicals can then purge and capture previously moderate institutions.

So-called experts invited to consult on the alleged problem of extremism included several members of the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center. The SPLC is incredibly well funded but has lost legitimacy even among liberal media outlets. The New York Times asked “Why is the SPLC targeting liberals?”, so you can only imagine what they think of conservatives. For the President of the SPLC, the use of the word “extremism” is explicitly used not to denote promotion of violence, but as a tool to defeat political enemies: “Obviously the hate label is a blunt one. It’s one of the things that gives it power…Someone might say, ‘Oh, it’s without nuance.’ … But we’ve always thought that hate in the mainstream is much more dangerous than hate outside of it. The fact that a group like the FRC or a group like FAIR can have congressional allies and can testify before congressional committees, the fact that a group like ADF can get in front of the Supreme Court — to me that makes them more dangerous, not less so… It’s the hate in the business suit that is a greater danger to our country than the hate in a Klan robe”. They’ve even called the tediously milquetoast Ben Carson an extremist. And now they’re helping to purge the military. The inquisitors don’t need to expel every deplorable — their campaign is so demoralizing to melanin-deprived troops that they will leave voluntarily.

PSYOP

The United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) hired a man named Richard Torres-Estrada as Chief of Diversity & Inclusion. Such people oversee hiring, administer training and dictate the culture at military institutions. Estrada posted a photograph of President Trump next to one of Adolf Hitler in a crude attempt to draw parallels between the two leaders. USSOCOM’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan calls for the organization to “ruthlessly self-assess” its cultural norms and narratives. The norms and narratives of USSOCOM may well become the norms of the world. Under the umbrella of USSOCOM sit’s MISO (Military Information Support Operations), formerly known as Psychological Operations. The purpose of MISO is to “influence the behavior of selected foreign target audiences by disseminating messages that are consistent with national objectives”. Once the purge of the military is complete, the people in charge of brainwashing foreign populations will be woke ideologues. Once the military has been captured and subverted by the most fanatical ideology since communism, the almost unlimited resources of the security apparatus can be deployed. The official journal of the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center describes MISO as USSOCOM’s primary means to counter “extremist ideologies”. What happens when this capacity is turned inwards? Or when “white supremacy” is declared not just the biggest security threat inside America, but in the world? What if the largest military industrial complex and intelligence apparatus the world has ever seen is put into the service of people who get their news from Joy Reid and their worldview from Robin DiAngelo?

Manufacturing dissent

Grievance-driven identity politics has become America’s primary cultural export. This ideological encroachment hasn’t gone unnoticed. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the United States of spreading “a cultural revolution” around the world that consisted of anti-white aggression and political correctness “taken to the extreme”. Even Emmanuel Macron, a centrist liberal, has complained of social theories “entirely imported from the United States, with their problems… which are just added to ours”. Mr. Macron’s education minister talked similarly of “a struggle against an intellectual matrix from American universities” that was in danger of causing the “fragmentation” of French society. “Liberal imperialism reigns in western Europe”, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban told one radio station, “they are trying to force their world-view on countries that think differently”. Much of this influence is independent of the American government, functioning primarily through global media networks and academia. The American state does, however, utilise and direct its soft power by funding a network of NGOs.

Masha Gessen is the perfect embodiment of the globalist American empire. A they/them non-binary trans lesbian and frothing at the mouth Putin critic, Gessen was Director of the Russian section of the U.S. government funded Radio Liberty and has been a speaker at the State Department’s Gays and Lesbians in Foreign Affairs Agencies Pride Day. Responding to the year-long BLM riots in 2020, Gessen asked “Why would you expect protests against state-sanctioned racist murder to be peaceful?” Gessen has said of marriage:

“Fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we’re going to do with marriage when we get there, because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change, and again, I don’t think it should exist.”

This is what America is pushing in Russia. Gessen has said wistfully “Bombing Moscow does not seem to be an option.” While launching World War Three in support of trans rights in Siberia is currently off the cards, Gessen promotes another option: “helping the Russian opposition in the same committed, involved, and even meddling manner as the U.S. once helped the Serbian opposition.” For Gessen and the State Department, the perfectly apt vehicle for such meddling was Pussy Riot, a wanton group of juvenile delinquents for whom protest mainly involved desecrating cathedrals.

Western powers like to present NGOs as a fundamental part of civil society and liberal democracy. They summon the image of conscientious local citizens banding together for noble causes. In reality, the most powerful NGO’s act as the de facto regime change arm of Western governments. Some of the most prominent NGO’s are “Non-Governmental” in name only. Freedom House, for example, shares a revolving door of employees with the federal government, and receives much of its funding from the American state. In 2019, Freedom House raised $48 million, $45 of which came from the US government. Former Secretary of Homeland Security under George W. Bush, Michael Chertoff, is Chair of the Board. Former CIA Director James Woolsey, a propagandist for the Iraq war, also served as Chairman. Freedom House is best known for its annual reports quantifying the level of democracy of different nations. Far from a neutral arbiter, Freedom House marks countries down for, among other things, a lack of same-sex marriage. Poland was downgraded for “mobilizing its base” (i.e. gaining a popular democratic mandate among the electorate) against “gender ideology”. While still contentious issues inside the US, promoting gender dysphoria and smashing heteronormativity have become objectives of the American empire. Trump was democratically elected on the promise of building a wall and reducing immigration. In spite of the popularity of such policies Freedom House downgraded America’s democracy score during Trump’s Presidency for what it termed “harsh” and “punitive” immigration and asylum policies.

Another key node in the invade-the-world-invite-the-world nexus is The Atlantic Council, a hugely influential think tank which has received funding from defense contractors BAE Systems, Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and General Atomics. Other financial backers include the Clinton Foundation, George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, the asset management firm BlackRock, and the U.S State Department. BlackRock, owned by woke billionaire Larry Fink, manages 6.84 trillion dollars worth of assets and is heavily invested in the defense industry. When not advocating for war, the Atlantic Council sponsors citizens of the third world to paint murals of George Floyd. The Council is a melange of politically correct apparatchiks and hawkish neocons. One Resident Fellow is Jared Holt, a man whose entire working life has been spent getting conversatives fired from their jobs and deplatformed from the internet. A sort of cancel culture commissar, Holt has managed to build a career out of calling conservatives racist at the Soros-funded Right Wing Watch. Another Atlantic Fellow is Terrell Jermaine Starr. Starr is pictured on the Atlantic Council’s website wearing an Angela Davis T-shirt. In 1969 FBI director J. Edgar Hoover declared that “without question” the Black Panther Party “represents the greatest threat to internal security of the country”. Today, their supporters are the foreign policy elite. Such people powwow with the ghouls of the Bush administration. In 2018 George W. accepted the Council’s Distinguished International Leadership Award and used his acceptance speech to warn against isolationism. The hegemonic ideology of America is now a mutant symbiosis of the thought of Dick Cheney and Ibram X. Kendi.

The Biden Doctrine: woke foreign policy and the new foreign policy establishment

Early in his presidency, Joe Biden spoke of America’s place in the world, explicitly stating that internal anti-white policies would also be applied abroad:

“We’ve taken steps to acknowledge and address systemic racism and the scourge of white supremacy in our own country. Racial equity will not just be an issue for one department in our administration, it has to be the business of the whole of government in all our federal policies and institutions. All this matters to foreign policy”. Speaking on the first anniversary of George Floyd’s overdose, White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan tweeted “the fight for racial justice at home and abroad is foundational to our future”. Karen Bass is Chair of a subcommittee of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and had been a top contender to be Joe Biden’s vice-presidential running mate. She has worked with BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors “for years” and is “proud to continue to call on her for advice”. BLM nearly had a direct line to the White House. Bass has been loudly calling for increased diversity in the State Department to spread this influence. Opal Tometi, one of the founders of Black Lives Matter, gave a speech on behalf of the US Mission to the United Nations in March of 2021 entitled “Addressing Racism as a U.S. Foreign Policy Imperative”. The agenda of BLM is now American foreign policy. In Washington D.C., the heart of the American empire, the words “BLACK LIVES MATTER” are permanently painted in 35-foot lettering in the newly renamed Black Lives Matter Plaza. Let’s be in no doubt that this is the official ideology of the U.S. state.

Diplomacy is the art of managing a country’s reputation, of trying to foster a positive public image, of cultivating soft power. America’s ambassador to the UN, by contrast, has pioneered what she terms “gumbo diplomacy”. Speaking in an address to the United Nation, Linda Thomas-Greenfield lambasted America: “I have seen for myself how the original sin of slavery weaved white supremacy into our founding documents and principles.” But it was not just America she would harangue for racism, but every country on earth, for “producing the racist”. Thomas-Greenfield uses the UN as a platform to take America’s local and historically specific culture wars and proselytize them to the world: “It’s the white supremacy that led to the senseless killing of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and so many other black Americans…That’s why the Biden administration has made racial equity a top priority across the entire government. And I’m making it a real focus of my tenure at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.” America’s own diplomats are now decrying the country they’re meant to be promoting. Yet this does not imply a more modest USA. When it comes to events that happened hundreds of years ago, or the phantasm of alleged racism today, America is deeply and irrationally self-critical. When it comes to ruinous wars, less so. In a curious and deranged combo, the American elite will trash America’s own reputation while maintaining enough arrogance to push “democracy” and human rights across the world. The American ruling class has perfected the language of white guilt while still claiming the legitimacy to overturn foreign governments.

The State Department is heavily targeting historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) for recruitment. Kamala Harris described a conversation with Secretary Blinken: “We talked about you, the students of HBCUs. We talked about how you are the future of the United States State Department. You are the future of foreign policy.” Not part of the future, simply THE future. Hiring based on merit is over. Ambassadors Melanne Verveer and Bonnie Jenkins developed diversity recommendations for Blinken, telling him that “diversity should be a key consideration in all new appointments”. “Some of them might have had some blemishes, but we’re willing to take that chance”, says Lt. Gen. Vincent R. Stewart, about his own drive to increase diversity in the intelligence community. Increasingly then, the American halls of power will be staffed by people like Jalina Porter. Jalina believes that “The largest threat to U.S. national security are U.S cops. Not ISIS… not any one or anything else. If y’all don’t wake up and rise to this truth, the genocide against Blacks in America will continue until we are near extinct”. We will not have wokeness in one country — this is an ideology with global ambitions. Jalina says the USA will “expose and take action against the racism and racial discrimination endemic in every society across the world.” Once again proving that America is no longer a serious country Porter led a “Wakanda Forever” salute (a symbol of black nationalism taken from a children’s comic book movie) while recruiting students from HBCUs to enter the State Department. Speaking to a Diversity Career Symposium, Jalina told potential recruits “President Bidens bedrock principle is that diversity is one of our country’s greatest strengths. And we know that eliminating inequity both at home and abroad is hard to do without pioneers like you”. America’s ruinous race relations are purposefully and explicitly being spread throughout the world. An official State Department video positively referenced the violent BLM protests of 2020: “the global racial justice protests” the speaker says, “made me realise that the fight for racial justice is unified across borders, languages and cultures”. Diplomat Linda Thomas Greenfield declares that she is “determined to harness that global solidarity” seen during the year of rioting “to advance racial justice everywhere”.

Anne-Marie Slaughter, preeminent intellectual propagandist of humanitarian-driven bloodshed has asked “why not start imagining what a foreign policy with racial equity at its core would look like?” Anne-Marie has played a key role in undermining sovereignty and normalising “humanitarian intervention”. These aren’t idle words. The “responsibility to protect” doctrine Anne-Marie advocated led to the disastrous war in Libya. Dispassionate realism in foreign policy is wholly replaced by a militarized moralizing hysteria. America has long had it’s goal as the imposition of multiculturalism in all nations, leaving a cosmopolitan dystopia in its wake. General Wesley Clark, speaking in Kosovo in the aftermath of NATO’s bombing campaign, made this explicit: “That’s what the fighting was about. That it wasn’t going to be a purely Serb place. Its not going to be a purely Albanian place. It is going to be multi-ethnic in the future. People have to have tolerance, have to move out of the past, out of the nineteenth century”. Targets of the NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ aerial bombardment included a Serb TV station in which sixteen civilian staff members were killed. Kosovo should stand as a stark warning. If America was willing to launch a blood-soaked military campaign in the name of tolerance and diversity back in the comparatively moderate 1990s, what does that bode for the future? The French Revolution begets Napoleon — this time with nukes.

The Lincoln Project is a PAC (political action committee) staffed entirely by once high-ranking Republican operatives with links to such insalubrious characters as John McCain and Bush’s senior and junior. In a frankly bonkers video ad, the Lincoln Project refers to the soldiers that stormed Normandy in World War Two as “antifa”. These American troops “relentlessly annihilated” fascism. This is undoubtedly true. Allied forces aerial bombed the cities of Hamburg and Dresden. America started development of the nuclear bomb not to drop on Japan, but on Germany. “We again face the rise of fascism”, claims the Lincoln Project, but this time round its “on our own shores”. That such a war is now referenced as aspirational is truly terrifying. The Lincoln Project video transitions from grainy black and white World War Two footage to images of Donald Trump. When they talk about fascists, they’re talking about you and your family.

Joe Biden, the man that told us that “Antifa is an idea”, told Congress “white supremacy is terrorism”. White supremacy is an ideology with a miniscule number of adherents. Its a mantle almost nobody uses as a self-descriptor, and which is now defined so loosely that it includes just about anything. The New York Times ran the headline ‘White Supremacy’ Once Meant David Duke and the Klan. Now It Refers to Much More. Biden was using the phrase to refer to MAGA supporters. Given that America launches drone strikes against terrorists (with their families as collateral damage) and starts incredibly bloody wars to purportedly fight terrorism, its a pretty alarming choice of words. America is adopting an inverted “White Man’s Burden” where enlightened multicultural liberal policy-makers will conduct a civilizing mission to wipe out the last vestige of what Ta-Nehisi Coates terms the “demon religion” of “whiteness”. Meanwhile on MSNBC, Frank Figliuzzi, former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI argued that sitting members of Congress should be arrested in connection with the 1/6 Capitol protest, branding them the “command and control element of a terrorist group”. Writing in The Root, aforementioned Terrell Jermaine Starr goes further, enthusiastically quoting a deluded self-declared black national security expert: “the Republican Party is functioning like a terror cell”, “If they we’re in Afghanistan, we would’ve hit them. Either a raid, drop a bomb on them”.

In the 1960s, African American’s opposed to the Vietnam war adopted the slogan “No Viet Cong ever called me nigger” — the real enemy, they surmised, was white people at home in the United States. Legacy Americans must make a similar realisation: “No Chicom ever called me racist”. The biggest threat today isn’t Russia or China, it’s the permanent regime in Washington. Woke excesses are so often met with eye-rolling, jokes and memes. The last institutional redoubts of the worlds preeminent military power are being captured by woke derangement. That’s of world-historical significance.

We are not scientists.

To understand the Covid thing and the problem with the alleged vaccines, we rely on the input of those who are.

On that score, we have lost count of the number of scientists, medical experts, pathologists, virologists and so on shouting out an urgent warning about the risks inherent in the booby trapped Covid experimental pseudo vaccines.

When a fire alarm goes off or someone thinks they smell smoke or some such thing, the SANE reaction is to investigate very thoroughly to find out what caused it. It might turn out to be nothing to worry about, it might not. The thing is though you do not just ignore it, you thoroughly investigate.

And so it is with the new experimental biochemical agents being touted as vaccines. With unprecedented number of adverse reactions, deaths and so forth associated with them, we are in the position of not just one alarm going off but hundreds in unprecedented numbers all over the place or not just one person reporting smoke, but thousands.

What kind of idiot or crook simply ignores those alarms and refuses to investigate  – or worse, seeks to discredit the alarms or shut them up?

And to stretch the analogy further what kind of psychopath persists in trying to shove people – even children – into the very building from which the smoke is rising?

We present the following article from the Hal Turner Radio Show for your consideration as yet one more alarm bell sounding among what is developing into a strident cacaphony screaming for some urgent, responsible attention.

“Global Time Bomb”

First case of postmortem study of patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2;

“viral RNA found in every organ of the body”

The first-ever autopsy of a person vaccinated against COVID-19, who tested negative 18 days later upon hospital admission but at 24 days after the VAX, has revealed viral RNA was found in almost every organ of the body.  The vaccine, while triggering an immune response, DID NOT STOP the virus from entering every organ in the body.

The viral RNA was found in virtually every organ in the body, which means the spike proteins as well.

There are antibodies (like the “vaccine” is supposed to create) but they’re irrelevant because, based on a study from Japan, we now know that the spike S1 protein is what does the damage.

We spoke to one Infectious Disease specialist from a hospital in New Jersey this morning.  We sent the actual autopsy findings to him and asked for his thoughts.

When he called back a while later, he was clearly shaken-up.   He told us “You cannot quote me by name, I will get fired by the hospital if you do.”   We agreed to conceal his identity.

He then told us:

“People think that only a MINORITY of people get adverse effects from the vaccine.

Based on this new research, it means that everyone – EVENTUALLY -will have adverse effects, because those spike proteins will be binding to ACE2 receptors everywhere in the body.  

That mRNA was supposed to stay in the injection site and it’s not.  That means the spike proteins created by the mRNA will be in every organ as well, and we now know it is the spike proteins that do the damage.

Worse, the viral RNA being found in every organ despite a vaccine, indicates either:

1) The vaccine doesn’t work at all, OR;

2) The virus is enjoying Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), meaning it actually spreads FASTER in vaccinated people.

This is a GLOBAL TIMEBOMB.”

According to the published postmortem report, the vaccinated man was 86 years old and tested NEGATIVE for COVID-19 when first admitted to the hospital with severe gastro-intestinal trouble and difficulty breathing. Here is what the reports describes:

We report on an 86-year-old male resident of a retirement home who received vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Past medical history included systemic arterial hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, dementia and prostate carcinoma. On January 9, 2021, the man received lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a 30 μg dose. On that day and in the following 2 weeks, he presented with no clinical symptoms (Table 1). On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea. Since he did not present with any clinical signs of COVID-19, isolation in a specific setting did not occur. Laboratory testing revealed hypochromic anemia and increased creatinine serum levels. Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative.

The report of the postmortem makes clear tests showed “no morphological changes associated with COVID” in his organs.

“Morphological” means structural.  COVID infection is now known to cause very specific structural changes to the places it infects.  THOSE CHANGES HAD NOT APPEARED in the vaccinated man before he died.

The now dead vaccinated man was in a room where another patient ultimately tested POSTIVE for COVID, and the report states they think the dead vaccinated man caught COVID after he was admitted, from the other patient in the same room.

So the damage to the organs of the now dead vaccine recipient, took place BEFORE he was infected with COVID by the other hospital room patient.

Worse, once the vaccinated man actually got COVID, it spread so fast within his body, he apparently never stood a chance.  Here are tissue images:

The full postmortem report is published at ScienceDirect.com

HAL TURNER COMMENTARY

I am not a Doctor or a Scientist so I cannot offer a competent medical analysis, but as a layman, from where I sit, this doesn’t look so good.

The Postmortem report says clearly “ These results indicate that the patient had already developed relevant immunogenicity through vaccination” yet he got infected by another patient at day 24 (after vax) upon being admitted to the hospital, and died 4 days later.

If one reads the entire article, the whole story is: Patient was given the vaccine, it got him hospitalized with ulcerative colitis due to blood clots, during his hospitalization he got infected by an asymptomatic hospital room mate, and died 4 days later.

My conclusion: the jab drove this elderly man to his end.

I might be wrong, but this is what I see from the postmortem report.

I have **not** taken the vax and I do not intend to take it.

Throughout this entire COVID debacle, the one constant is that the disease has a 99.8% SURVIVAL rate.  To me, it’s not a pandemic.  To me it’s not even worth getting a vaccine; I think my immune system will handle it just fine.

Given all the adverse reactions to the vax, I now firmly conclude that getting the vax is a far more dangerous thing than getting the actual illness. [emphasis added]

God gave me an immune system.  I think I will trust God on this.  After all, I truly believe I will not live one micro-second longer than God wants, and conversely, I will not die one micro-second sooner than God wants.

Faith is not “belief without proof”  it is “trust without reservation.”  I trust God.

SUDDEN DEATH of 32 YEAR OLD

This couple’s step-son, age 32, died from a heart attack 12 hours after getting the Johnson & Johnson Vaccine.  Coroner refuses to release reports; calls cause of death “inconclusive.”   A lot of these deaths are simply being covered up. 

Investigative Issues: An Interview With Donald Trump, Unbowed

Trump gave the distinct impression that he is itching to get into the presidential race in 2024

In a wide-ranging interview from the corner office atop his eponymous New York City tower last week, an unfiltered Donald Trump showed he has lost none of his edge as he attacked President Biden’s ethics, demanded reparations from China for COVID-19, and advanced his claim that the 2020 election was stolen.

Here are some of the highlights, as the former president held forth on a range of issues in his inimitable style.

If society collapses, you can bet that the foods the pioneers ate will become dietary staples

The Lost Ways prepares you to deal with worst-case scenarios with the minimum amount of resources just like our forefathers lived their lives, totally independent from electricity, cars, or modern technology.

So pay chose attention because this video will change your life forever for the good!

Chinese Influence Over the Bidens, and America

Trump – whose administration was hobbled by false charges that he was beholden to Russian President Vladimir Putin — asserted that China has American politicians, “especially Biden and the son [Hunter Biden] (Pictured/Associated Press) … wrapped around their finger. They know so much about Biden that’s so illegal … [that the president] can no longer be a person that takes on China because they can blackmail him like nobody’s ever been blackmailed before.”

“China has tremendous power over the Biden administration because of Biden himself,” Trump added. “There was tremendous money paid to the Biden family – not only China; there were numerous other countries too, and it’s not allowed to be spoken about.”

Trump did not provide evidence for these claims, although a U.S. Senate committee report on the Biden family’s business dealings raised questions about its involvement with Chinese, Russian, and Ukrainian nationals and entities. Information found on a laptop once owned by Hunter Biden – who is facing a federal investigation into his taxes – has also raised questions about the President Biden’s ties to his son’s questionable affairs.

“We were doing great with China. I was going to be doing things that would’ve put us on a course that would’ve been forever great, and now we have people – they almost can’t be tough on China because China knows too much about them,” Trump said. “It’s a very sad thing.”

With respect to the political class more broadly, Trump asserted that “China’s got the strongest lobbying machine you’ve ever seen. … You go to Washington and try and hire somebody to oppose China? Can’t do it. They’ve got everybody.” 

The 2020 election

Trump remains adamant that the results were illegitimate. (Pictured/ AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell) “You’ve heard the expression that the person who counts the votes is far more important than the candidate, right? I never thought much about it; turned out to be right. It’s a corrupt election and you’ll never hear me say anything else. And they’re vicious. … They go after you for saying it.”

Although it is widely disputed that any alleged improprieties influenced enough votes to swing the election to him, Trump remains fixated on the mail-in votes that were counted late in the evening on Election Day in many states, eroding a larger-than-expected Election Day turnout by Trump supporters. He presented several charts showing the changes in the presidential vote counts — including those in swing states such as Pennsylvania — as election night wore on into the wee hours of the morning.

“Our elections are rigged” he said. “People say, ‘Oh, just focus on the future.’ You can’t focus on the future when this happens.”

Later, the former president asserted: “I don’t believe that a message of defund the police, open borders, sanctuary cities, no freedom of speech … gets 50% of the vote. I think you get 50% because [Democrats] cheat like hell in the elections … and that’s what they want to do to the whole country.”

Experts predict that an EMP strike that wipes out electricity across the nation would ultimately lead to the demise of up to 90% of the population. However, this figure begs an important question: if we were able to live thousands of years without even the concept of electricity, why would we suddenly all die without it?

Possible Wuhan Lab Leak

Denounced by Democrats and the media as a racist for blaming China for COVID-19, Trump feels vindicated as evidence emerges suggesting that the virus might have leaked from a Chinese virology lab in Wuhan.(Pictured/AP Photo/Ng Han Guan) But he believes it was unintentional, likely a product of “gross incompetence.” What was intentional, in Trump’s mind, was the decision by Chinese leaders to allow its citizens to travel globally, which spread the pandemic. Trump has called for countries to cancel their debts to China as part of a down payment on a future reparations plan that he suggests ought to total some $10 trillion.

Trump said COVID-19 has exacted prices and affected history in ways that may be hard to measure. Before the pandemic, he said, he “had a great relationship with” with Chinese General Secretary Xi Jinping. But the “China virus killed all of that. … [It] killed a lot of people, it also killed my relationship [with Xi].”

Boycotting the 2022 China Olympics

Trump said he would not pull America out of the 2022 Winter Games in Beijing and neighboring Hebei province because it would be “unfair to the athletes.” (Pictured/AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Describing the Olympics as “peanuts,” Trump also suggested that  a boycott would be seen around the world as “sour grapes.”

“I see it both ways,” he added, “but I would not do that. … You go. You compete. You win.”

The Border and Central America Policy

Trump said the Biden administration has “totally lost control” of the U.S.-Mexico border. He also questions the wisdom of the  administration’s plan to provide several billion dollars in aid to the Central American countries (Pictured/ Cacahuate, amendments by Joelf/Wikimedia) from which immigrants are flowing. “I refused to give them money, and their signs [say], ‘We love Trump, Trump won.’ They’re booing [Vice President Kamala Harris].” Meanwhile, “instead of saying we’re not going to pay you, [the Biden administration is] giving them $4 billion.

“I treated them so tough, and they liked me,” he said, adding that the Biden administration “treats them weakly.”

The Durham Probe

Trump asked, rhetorically, about the status of the federal probe into the origins of Russiagate led by Special Counsel John Durham:(Pictured/Department of Justice via AP) “Where the hell is Durham? Is that an embarrassment, or what? I wonder if Durham’s ever even going to come out with a report.

“They have him scared,” Trump continued. “Probably come out with a bad report. When I heard that he was going to come out with a report sometime during the Biden administration, I said, ‘You gotta be kidding.’ It’s a disgrace. In the meantime, we don’t hear anything about him.”

During the interview, President Trump focused on the success of the candidates he endorsed, and his continued endorsements — while describing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell as a “stupid bastard.” Trump also touted his efforts to facilitate vaccine development through Operation Warp Speed and roll it out in short order as perhaps his greatest achievement. He also emphasized his toughness in deal-making with friends and enemies alike.

Over the course of the more than hourlong session, Trump gave the distinct impression that he is itching to get into the presidential race in 2024. 

On December 6th President Trump’s words shook the world.

For the first time in over 2000 years, Jerusalem was recognized as the capital of Israel.

Whether he knows it or not, President Trump fulfilled his part in a frightening biblical prophecy exactly as the scriptures predicted.

Only the top church leaders and Bible scholars know the real meaning behind this great and terrible moment, yet no one is saying a thing about it…

So pay chose attention because this video will change your life forever for the good!

If a gunman put a pistol to your daughter’s head… if a mugger put a snubnosed revolver in your wife’s face… could you make that shot? 

Would you even try? 

Well, one St. Louis man recently did when a pair of home invaders took his teenaged daughter hostage from the front of their home and tried forcing her into their house to do God knows what to her and her family.

The man grabbed his gun and shot them both before they could get past the front door.

He shot them both!

One of the two home invaders was pronounced dead at the scene, and I guarantee you that was the one holding this man’s daughter.

But it should force you to look at how he did it, and…

Ask Yourself These 3 Home Defense Hostage Questions…

1. Is Your Gun Accessible (Like NOW)?

In this man’s story, the gunmen didn’t get a chance to take control of his family inside because he got the drop on them.

Is your gun accessible quickly enough that you could respond to an instant attack like this?

Or do you have to run upstairs to your bedside table or gun safe to get it?

2. Are You A Responsibly Armed FAMILY?

What if you’re ambushed, beaten, and tied up?

Does your spouse also have a firearm — and the training to back it up?

Would your children even know how to fire a gun without your coaching if they were able to access one in a struggle or when a home invader wasn’t looking?

3. Would You Know How To Save A Loved One Held Hostage?

You need to have a plan based on a scenario where someone you love could be taken hostage – no matter how “tactically” you think you live your life.

In this St. Louis man’s scenario, his daughter was used as a hostage and home invaders know that putting a gun to a loved one’s head will get you to comply every time.

Could you take the shot if your child or spouse had a gun to their head?

Think about it… even at 3 yards in a relaxed atmosphere of a gun range, your shot group could be off just enough to kill your loved one.

Now, imagine if your heart is racing… your hands are trembling… and the home invader is 5, 7, or more yards away.

Don’t wonder what you’d do when that terrible moment comes.

Answer these 3 questions and put your plan in place now!

Do You And Your Family Have An Integrated Home Defense Plan?

What Roles Does Each Family Member Play? Please Share Below…

The COVID HOAX was never about the “virus”, which never even existed; it was always about frightening goyim-gentiles into taking the Zionist COVID-Lethal-Injection (ZCLI). 

(Disclaimer– This plan can be termed Communist, Satanist, Cabalist, Masonic as well as Zionist.)

Some Elementary Steps In Zionist UN Agenda 2030 For Quickly Culling The “Useless Eaters”

Because I’m a bit OCD, I realized in March 2020 that Americans were doing masks wrong. People were constantly taking the same mask off and then putting it on again after it had spent time in pockets, purses, car seats, and backpacks, or just been dangling under their chins. In my OCD imagination, I could see the cross-contaminants grow and fester. This is especially true for healthy, normal children who are grubby disease vectors. I was right, too. Parents in Florida sent five kids’ masks and one adult mask to a lab at the University of Florida. The results were scary and disgusting, for the masks had plenty of dangerous pathogens. The only thing missing from the masks was COVID.

The parents were concerned about potential contaminants on the mask, which is why they contacted the University of Florida’s Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center for analysis. Each mask sent to the lab had been either new or freshly laundered at the start of the day. Then, the kids and the adult wore them for five to eight hours. The kids, aged 6 through 11, wore their masks for in-person schooling. In addition, for each mask, the parents sent samples from a t-shirt that one of the children had been wearing. Three of the masks were surgical masks, two were cotton, and one was a poly gaiter.

According to Rational Ground, which reported this story, the analysis showed 11 dangerous pathogens on the masks:

• Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)
• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)
• Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)
• Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)
• Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs—resistant to antibiotics)
• Escherichia coli (food poisoning)
• Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)
• Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)
• Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)
• Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)
• Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)

Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.

Just about the only thing that didn’t show up on the masks was COVID, even though the test was sensitive enough to have revealed COVID had it existed.

The actual lab reports are here. The following is the list of the pathogens found on just one of the masks:

••••

••••

••••

It doesn’t take a genius, or even a neurotic person, to figure out the stupidity of sticking masks on children’s faces for hours a day, without regard for cross-contamination or the amount of time worn. It actually speaks well for the immune systems of American children that we didn’t have massive outbreaks of a medieval spectrum of dangerous diseases.

If America survives, we will look back on this interval and be as unable to comprehend what happened as we are when we struggle to understand the mindset of people living hundreds or even thousands of years ago. This was a year of collective madness unlike anything seen before in American history.

Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner?  Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order?  Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times”?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.

At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The official definition of terrorism is “The use, or threat, of force with the intention of achieving a political goal.” That makes it pretty clear what sort of people are covered, and for decades it worked well.  The government applied the label “terrorist” to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But the Obama administration removed all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” was applied to large groups of American citizens.

And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that were being held at Guantanamo Bay.  So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke.  The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them.  And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

1. “Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. “Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. “Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. “Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. “Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
7. “Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”
8. “Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. “Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs” 
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
72. Evangelical Christians

The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with.  In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.

We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history.  You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs.  Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes ruled that Texas law only protects employees from being fired if they are asked to commit an illegal act that carries criminal penalties. Getting a COVID vaccine is “not an illegal act,” the judge said.

A federal judge in Texas on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit by healthcare workers who accused their employer of “unlawfully forcing its employees” to receive the COVID vaccine.

Jennifer Bridges and 116 other plaintiffs said Houston Methodist Hospital is forcing employees to get COVID vaccines that are “experimental and dangerous.” Firing employees for refusing the vaccine is “wrongful termination,” the plaintiffs said.

The hospital last week suspended nearly 200 employees who refused the vaccine.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes ruled Texas law only protects employees from being fired if they are asked to commit an illegal act that carries criminal penalties. According to the judge’s ruling, “receiving a COVID-19 vaccination is not an illegal act, and it carries no criminal penalties.”

The plaintiffs argued requiring employees to get the COVID vaccine violates federal law because the vaccines have not received full approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are still Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) products.

Hughes dismissed this claim, saying the law authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to roll out “medical products intended for use in an emergency.”

Hughes said:

“[The law] confers certain powers and responsibilities to the Secretary of Health and Human Services in an emergency. It neither expands nor restricts the responsibilities of private employers; in fact, it does not apply at all to private employers like the hospital in this case. It does not confer a private opportunity to sue the government, employer, or worker.”

In his ruling, Hughes said, claims that the vaccines are dangerous are “false, and it is also irrelevant.”

The ruling means employees of the Texas hospital must provide proof of being vaccinated for COVID or lose their job.

Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel, said the decision is “disappointing” and “there are grounds for an appeal.”

Holland said:

“I think the judge has misinterpreted federal law and does not fully understand the true implications of Emergency Use Authorization status. Because EUA means the product is experimental, you can’t be forced to take it. No employer can mandate the COVID vaccine while it remains under EUA.”

Jared Woodfill, an attorney representing Bridges and other plaintiffs, said his clients are “committed to fighting this unjust policy.”

Woodfill told Fox News, Houston Methodist is using COVID vaccine mandates to promote profits. The hospital is trying to convince patients to leave their healthcare provider and come to Houston Methodist because all of its employees are vaccinated, said Woodfill.

“The problem with that line of thinking,” said Woodfill, “is that you’re telling the hospital’s employees they are going to be human guinea pigs.”

For the plaintiffs, “this is a question of being able to pay their house notes, pay their car notes, provide for their families and avoid bankruptcy,” said Woodfill. “It’s just plain wrong.”

Dr. Marc Boom, CEO and president of Houston Methodist, said in a statement:

“…99 percent of Houston Methodist’s 26,000 employees have met the requirements for the vaccination mandate. It is unfortunate that the few remaining employees who refuse to get vaccinated and put our patients first are responding in this way.”

Under federal law, employers and universities cannot legally mandate COVID vaccines because they are unlicensed Emergency Use Authorization products which are, by definition, experimental.

With more than 100 U.S. colleges mandating COVID vaccines for in-person attendance and schools enforcing mask mandates, it’s critical people understand their rights.

The bottom line is this: mandating products authorized for Emergency Use Authorization status (EUA) violates federal law as detailed in the following legal notifications.

All COVID vaccines, COVID PCR and antigen tests, and masks are merely EUA-authorized, not approved or licensed, by the federal government. Long-term safety and efficacy have not been proven.

EUA products are by definition experimental, which requires people be given the right to refuse them. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.”

Earlier this year, Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel, and attorney Greg Glaser stated that federal law prohibits employers from mandating EUA COVID vaccines (or EUA COVID-19 tests or masks).

Holland and Glaser wrote:

“If a vaccine has been issued EUA by the FDA, it is not fully licensed and must be voluntary. A private party, such as an employer, school or hospital cannot circumvent the EUA law, which prohibits mandates. Indeed, the EUA law preventing mandates is so explicit that there is only one precedent case regarding an attempt to mandate an EUA vaccine.”

What to do if your school or employer says you must get the COVID vaccine

The Children’s Health Defense legal team has written three legal notifications that anyone faced with a COVID vaccine, COVID test or mask mandate can use to inform employers and universities that they are violating federal law.

All of the notifications include this language: 

“Federal law, Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, states the following about products granted emergency authorization usage:

Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—

(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;

(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and

(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

Any entity or organization that requires EUA COVID-19 vaccinations, COVID-19 tests or masks are in violation of federal law, and will likely face lawsuits if they don’t allow exemptions or alternatives.”

Submitting the notices prepared by Children’s Health Defense is the first step prior to seeking an exemption or taking legal action.

Vaccine exemption laws vary by state. Go to the National Vaccine Information Center to learn more about your state exemptions.

It’s critical to stand against mandates and preserve legally protected, fundamental human rights on issues related to health freedom. Don’t fall prey to coercion and pressure, use the resources available to protect your legal rights.

Just like today, brass and bureaucrats ignored warnings, and sent troops overseas despite the consequences.

The U.S. military has been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to make some serious changes in their operations. But the Pentagon, and especially the Navy, have also displayed a revealing resistance to moves to stand down that were clearly needed to protect troops from the raging virus from the start.

The Army and Marine Corps have shifted from in-person to virtual recruitment meetings. But the Pentagon has reversed an initial Army decision to postpone further training and exercises for at least 30 days, and it has decided to continue sending new recruits from all the services to basic training camps, where they would no doubt be unable to sustain social distancing.

On Thursday, the captain of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, on which the virus was reportedly spreading, was relieved of command. He was blamed by his superiors for the leak of a letter he wrote warning the Navy that failure to act rapidly threatened the health of his 5,000 sailors.

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper justified his decision to continue many military activities as usual by declaring these activities are “critical to national security.” But does anyone truly believe there is a military threat on the horizon that the Pentagon must prepare for right now? It is widely understood outside the Pentagon that the only real threat to that security is the coronavirus itself.

Esper’s decisions reflect a deeply ingrained Pentagon habit of protecting its parochial military interests at the expense of the health of American troops. This pattern of behavior recalls the far worse case of the U.S. service chiefs once managing the war in Europe. They acted with even greater callousness toward the troops being called off to war in Europe during the devastating “Spanish flu” pandemic of 1918, which killed 50 million people worldwide.

Itwas called the “Spanish flu” only because, while the United States, Britain and France were all censoring news about the spread of the pandemic in their countries to maintain domestic morale, the press in neutralist Spain was reporting freely on influenza cases there. In fact, the first major wave of infections in the United States came in U.S. training camps set up to serve the war.

Abundant documentary evidence shows that the 1918 pandemic actually began in Haskell County, Kansas, in early 1918, when many residents came down with an unusually severe type of influenza. Some county residents were then sent to the Army’s Camp Funston at Ft. Riley, Kansas, the military’s largest training facility, training 50,000 recruits at a time for the war. Within two weeks, thousands of soldiers at the camp became sick with the new influenza virus, and 38 died.

Recruits at 14 of 32 large military training camps set up across the country to feed the U.S. war in Europe soon reported similar influenza outbreaks, apparently because some troops from Camp Funston had been sent there. By May 1918, hundreds of thousands of troops, many of whom were already infected, began boarding troopships bound for Europe, and the crowding onboard the ships created ideal conditions for the virus to explode further.

In the trenches in France, still more U.S. troops continued to be sickened by the virus, at first with milder illness and relatively few deaths But the war managers simply evacuated the sick and brought in fresh replacements, allowing the virus to adapt and mutate into more virulent and more lethal strains.

The consequences of that approach to the war became evident after the August 27 arrival in Boston harbor, when visitors brought a much more virulent and lethal strain of the virus; it quickly entered Boston itself and by September 8, had appeared at Camp Devens outside the city. Within ten days, the camp had thousands of soldiers sick with the new strain, and some of those infected at the camp boarded troops ships for Europe.

Meanwhile the lethal new strain spread from Camp Devens across the United States through September and October, ravaging one city after another. From September onward, the U.S. command in France, led by Gen. John Pershing, and the war managers in the War Department in Washington, were well aware that both U.S. troops already in Europe and the American public were suffering vast numbers of severe illnesses and death from the pandemic.

Nevertheless, Pershing continued to call for large numbers of the replacements for those stricken at the front lines, as well as for new divisions to launch a major offensive late in the year. In a message to the War Department on September 3, Pershing demanded an additional 179,000 troops.

The internal debate that followed that request, recounted by historian Carol R. Byerly, documents the chilling indifference of Pershing and the military bureaucracy in Washington to the fate of American troops they planned to send to war. After watching the horror of lethally-infected soldiers dying of pneumonia in the infected camps, acting Army Surgeon General Charles Richard strongly advised Army Chief of Staff Peyton March in late September against sending troops from the infected camps to France until the epidemic had been brought under control in the surrounding region, and March agreed.

Richard then asked for stopping the draft calls for young men heading for any camp known to be already infected. March wouldn’t go that far, and although the October draft was called off, it was to resume in November. The War Department acknowledged the heavy toll the pandemic was taking on U.S. troops in October 10, informing Pershing that he would get his troops by November 30, “if we are not stopped on account of Influenza, which has now passed the 200,000 mark.”

Richard then called for troops to be quarantined for a week before being shipped to Europe, and that the troopships carry only half the standard number of troops to reduce crowding. When March rejected those moves, which would have made it impossible for him to meet Pershing’s targets, Richard then recommended that all troop shipments be suspended until the influenza pandemic was brought under control, “except such as are demanded by urgent military necessity.”

But the chief of staff rejected such a radical shift in policy, and went to the White House to get President Woodrow Wilson’s approval for the decision. Wilson, obviously recognizing the implications of going ahead under the circumstances, asked why he refused to stop troop transport during the epidemic. March argued that Germany would be encouraged to fight on if it knew “the American divisions and replacements were no longer arriving.”Wilson then approved his decision, refusing to disturb Pershing’s war plans.

But the decision was not carried out fully. The German Supreme Command had already demanded that the Kaiser accept Wilson’s 14 points, and the armistice was signed on November 11.

The disastrous character of the U.S. elite running the First World War is clearly revealed with the astonishing fact that more American soldiers were killed and hospitalized by influenza (63,114) than in combat (53,402). And an estimated 340,00 American troops were hospitalized with influenza/pneumonia, compared with 227,000 hospitalized by Germans attacks.

The lack of concern of Washington bureaucrats for the well-being of the troops, as they pursue their own war interests, appears to be a common pattern—seen too, in the U.S. wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. Now it has been revealed once again in the stunningly callous response of the Pentagon to the coronavirus pandemic crisis.

In the 1918 war, there was no protest against that cold indifference, but there are now indications that the families of soldiers put being at risk are expressing their anger about it openly to representatives of the military. In a time of socio-political upheaval, and vanishing tolerance for the continuation of endless war, it could be a harbinger of accelerated unraveling of political tolerance for the war state’s overweening power.