On its back foot on all things Russia and Ukraine, the US-dominated collective West, its MSM press agents and Nazified Kiev persist in defying reality on the ground by falsely pretending otherwise.
According to the neocon infested Institute for the Study of War — a notorious Washington-based propaganda operation publishing state-approved talking points — Kiev regime troops are making “substantial gains (sic).”
Reality on the ground is worlds apart different from the above trash.
And this from AP (fake) News on Tuesday:
The collective West “rejected” accession treaties ratified by Russia’s Parliament — in full compliance with international law, the wire service failed to explain.
And this Russia-bashing fake news by Al Jazeera, saying:
Kiev regime troops “advance(d) in the south and east (sic)” while Russia’s parliament approved accession of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye.
And this WaPo fake news:
Approved accession treaties “violat(ed) international law (sic).”
And this NYT trash in its latest fake news edition:
Russia “d(oes) not know where borders are for new (republics and) regions (sic).”
“Russian forces (are) on the run (sic) across a broad swath of the frontline (sic).
Regime troops “pressed (their nonexistent) blitz offensive (sic) in the east and made gains in the south (sic).”
The above trash and daily volumes more reflect how the public mind is manipulated throughout the US/West by MSM fake news rubbish — truth and full disclosure banned on key issues.
Last week, CNBC reported a rare kernel of reality about US/Western war on Russia by use of expendable Ukrainian foot soldiers, saying:
The collective West is “running out of weapons to send to Ukraine.”
Ramping up production may take place but it’s no quick fix or simple task.
US merchants of death, mass destruction and human misery produce about 30,000 rounds of 155 millimeter howitzer shells annually.
Ukrainian Nazi and conscript troops expend that volume in about “two weeks,” said CNBC.
According to US National Defense University’s senior military fellow, Dave Des Roches:
“Unless we have new production, which takes months to ramp up, we’re not going to have the ability to supply the Ukrainians.”
And this from the EU’s so-called foreign policy chief, Borrell, saying:
“Military stocks of most (European NATO regimes (have been) depleted in a high proportion.”
Hegemon USA nearly exhausted its supply of 155 howitzers and shells — except for what’s reserved for its own forces.
And this reality check from retired marine corps colonel/senior Center for Strategic and International Studies advisor, Mark Cancian:
“There are a number of systems where the (US war department) reached levels where it’s not willing to provide more of that particular system to Ukraine,” adding:
Hegemon USA “needs to maintain stockpiles to support (its) war plans.”
“For some munitions, the driving war plan would be a conflict with China over Taiwan or in the South China Sea.”
“For others, particularly ground systems, the driving war plan would be North Korea or Europe.”
The empire of lies and forever wars is “limited” in how many HIMARS, Javelin and Stinger missiles, as well as M777 howitzers and 155 mm shells it can supply to Ukrainian Nazis and conscript troops.
It takes one to four years to boost weapons production significantly, Cancian stressed.
Last spring, Lockheed Martin spokesman, Jim Taiclet, said the following:
It takes “6, 12 to 18 months” to deliver weapons once “our supply chain (is) ramped up.”
Left unexplained by CNBC and other MSM is how much in the way of arms and equipment supplied to the Kiev regime is destroyed by Russian forces.
In stark contrast, analyst Helmholz Smith explained the following:
Russian videos show “trains carrying heavy equipment west.”
“I’ve seen tanks, Mstas, BM-21s, Iskanders and lots of BMPs.”
“Nothing suggests that Russia is running out of anything.”
“This suggests preparations for a large-scale Russian Army armored offensive along traditional deep penetration doctrine.”
“The status of four new regions opens the possibility of more forceful actions by the Russian Armed Forces because they are defending the Motherland.”
“There is a good deal of plausible speculation that the 300 thousand man call up may free up soldiers in the rear.”
“If so, the effect of extra troops may be felt sooner than many expect.”
And if a winter campaign follows, Russian forces are well-equipped, trained and experienced in frigid weather fighting.
And this reality check posted by military analyst Andrei Martyanov, an analysis by an individual identified as Larch, saying the following:
“Putin set the goals of the SMO.”
“The demilitarization of an enormous military, stocked for eight years and restocked feverishly from the bases and warehouses of 30 countries in NATO, is going very well.”
“The Ukies had 750,000 men in trenches and fortified positions and embedded in big cities, shielded by civilians everywhere from Kiev to the smallest settlement in Donbass.”
“Ukraine had a significant air force and stout air defenses with BUKs and S-300s in large numbers.”
“The Russians reduced this order of battle markedly.”
“The navy of Ukraine is gone. It has no functioning naval bases.”
“The Ukie air defenses have been reduced to mobile radars and a few extant S-300s.”
“The most effective air defense they have is the tactic of massing MANPADS and receiving real time alerts from NATO of oncoming Russian jets and helos.”
“This has not stopped the Russian aerospace forces, though it is a hampering defense that has to be recognized as a threat.”
“The Ukie air force is 95% gone, only replenished from NATO with aircraft that stay in the battle for minutes before they are reduced to losses.”
“Over 500,000 Ukies are gone, dead and forever off the battlefield.”
“Thousands of mercs have been killed or chased off the battlefield.”
“The entire junior officer echelon of Ukraine is gone.”
“US and NATO officers are the tactical commanders, as communications in the battlefield document.”
“American and British voices give the commands. Videos are available as proof.”
“Every strategic offensive launched by Kiev (and NATO command running its military) has been destroyed.”
“The only ground they gained was ceded in order to draw the Ukies into the open or to reposition Russian forces to better lines of defense.”
“The Ukies lost forever Mariupol, Kherson, Melitopol, all of Lugansk, 65% of Donetsk, their access to the sea (except with Russian permission at Odessa), the air space over most of Ukraine, and sovereign control over their utilities and transport systems which exist only as long as the Russians allow.”
“Ukraine is under its 4th total mobilization.”
“By winter’s end it will have lost another 100,000 of their cannon fodder.”
“Likely, too, they will have lost what they hold in the Donetsk oblast.”
“The Russians have done this while exposing only 15% of their military.”
“It is clear from signs in Chechnya that (General) Kadyrov could gather 100,000 extra men who want to join Chechen forces from the Caucuses and other brotherly Muslim lands.”
“There are also ample signs that Syrians and some African fighters want to join Russia in the battle against the hegemon.”
“Another 100,000 foreigners could easily be brought to Ukraine, if needed.”
“Russia has enormous depth of reserves beyond its own manpower potential.”
“What (Russian) generals have done is send steel and explosives to demilitarize Ukraine.”
“Artillery, bombs, rockets and missiles are fighting the war, saving Russian manpower while decimating Ukie force structure.”
Things are “going very well for the mission Putin set.”
“Ukraine will be destroyed and NATO will have no proxy.”
“NATO will have to send its own manpower.”
“That stage of warfare will fracture the alliance.”
“The US will have to coerce a new proxy force to fight Russia out in the open sectors of Ukraine.”
“They won’t be in fortified positions. And they won’t have civilians as shields.”
“If the US manages to spread war into Poland and Belarus and Moldova, a few hypersonic missiles from Russia will quench the enthusiasm of those NATO countries, and Russia will join with Belarus in an overwhelming punishment of Poles and Baltics.”
“If Kaliningrad is touched, the attackers will lose their capitals and HQs.”
“What the Russian military has not done does not indicate what (it’s very much able to) do.”
“Strategically, the SMO is very successful.”
“Pulling out of Izyum and Lyman are blips that don’t even factor in the military scheme of things.”
As was expected today, once facts (are revealed), the scale of failure of (so-called Kiev) offensives become clear.”
The above reality check is worlds apart from daily propaganda rubbish by US/Western regimes and their MSM co-conspirators.
The following featured article discusses how, far from being ineffective, the covadiddlyjabs actually INCREASE your chances of infection and hospitalisation.
An increased risk of Covadoodle infection is hardly worth risking the manifold harms now clearly linked to the jabs, such as heart attacks, cancers, autoimmune diseases, fertility problems and other known side effects, especially as the alleged disease itself, comparable in the vast majority of cases with colds and flu, carries a very low overall fatality risk.
It also means there must be justice for the millions of people conned, coerced, cajoled, bullied, threatened or otherwise manipulated into submitting to these dangerous and ineffective jabs on false pretences and outright lies. And for those victimised, denigrated and ruined because they were brave enough to speak out and try to warn others.
When subjected to medical intervention, the principle of INORMED CONSENT is a just and rational principle. Indeed it is a crucial human right if we wish to safeguard humanity from mass murder by malicious lunatics.
The public in this instance are being systematically MISinformed with evident malice aforethought and as a result an as yet unknown but certainly unacceptably large number of people are going to suffer illness and death.
DEFINITIONS
What’s the difference between disinform and misinform? Disinform means to intentionally provide or spread false information with the intent to mislead or deceive. Misinform, which is much more commonly used, means to provide someone with false information, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is being done intentionally.
Vaccination Increases Infection Risk by 44%,
Oxford Study Finds
Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44% more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission.
The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8th 2020 to November 17th 2021, meaning it spanned the Alpha and Delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded.
The results for effectiveness against positive Covid test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.
I’ve highlighted in yellow three key figures. The top two show that in the two weeks following the first jab individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for Covid than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is further confirmation of the post-jab spike in infections that has often been noted and which there is evidence is a result of the vaccination temporarily reducing immunity.
The third figure shows that two weeks or more after the second jab – which during 2021 was regarded as ‘fully vaccinated’ – individuals were 44% more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is negative vaccine effectiveness (where infections are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated) of minus-44%. This negative effectiveness is in line with what was seen in the raw data from England at the time and also in studies from other countries, but contradicts the Government’s official estimates, which claimed effectiveness to be 60-85% against Delta infection. The new study indicates that the negative effectiveness was not just a result of confounding factors or a ‘catch-up’ effect, where the vaccinated have lower infection rates initially then higher infection rates as the effect of the vaccine wears off, as some have claimed.
Acknowledging the figures, the authors write: “Surprisingly, we observed a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across all BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the U.K. ONS.” What they don’t mention is that it is fully in line with data from the UKHSA, nor that the ONS is known to overestimate infection rates in the unvaccinated because it underestimates the population – the ONS puts the unvaccinated adult population at 8% whereas the NIMS database puts it at 19% (and surveys higher still at 26%).
The authors state that the “hospital admission and death outcomes were considered more robust outcomes than infection” owing to “variability in testing” and a potentially “high proportion of asymptomatic infections”. The implication is that unvaccinated people were less likely to get tested when infected, suppressing the positive test rate in the unvaccinated. No evidence is provided for this claim, however, nor any attempt made to quantify the possible size of the difference.
The study was published in June but went largely unnoticed until Alex Berenson wrote about it last week. Alex also draws attention to the fact that vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death is much weaker than was claimed at the time.
Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61% (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90-99% claimed by the Government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44% higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61% effectiveness to just 34%.
Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97%, from 61% following the second jab, despite this being before the effect of the booster should kick in. This oddity is not explained.
Looking at the hospitalisation figures, there is a disturbing spike in the weeks following the first jab, hitting over twice as high (2.02) in the second week. Why are the vaccinated up to twice as likely to be hospitalised with Covid than the unvaccinated in the weeks following the jab?
The figures show that having two vaccine doses reduces hospitalisation risk by 66% once 14 days post-injection (though once again there is an unexplained leap in efficacy from 19% 28 days after dose 1 to 67% in the week after dose 2). The 66% is markedly lower than the 90-99% claimed at the time, as shown below in the table from a UKHSA Government report in September 2021.
UKHSA, September 2021
The new figures are much more in line with what was observed in the raw UKHSA data. But it means we’re left without explanation as to why the clinical trials and Government studies showed high efficacy for a two dose course, when observational studies of the real-world evidence now find negative effectiveness against infection and much lower than advertised effectiveness against serious disease. An explanation is clearly required. And given the earlier studies were used to inform both individuals’ choices and public policy, including medical coercion, serious lessons need to be learned.
The following featured article discusses how, far from being ineffective, the covadiddlyjabs actually INCREASE your chances of infection and hospitalisation.
An increased risk of Covadoodle infection is hardly worth risking the manifold harms now clearly linked to the jabs, such as heart attacks, cancers, autoimmune diseases, fertility problems and other known side effects, especially as the alleged disease itself, comparable in the vast majority of cases with colds and flu, carries a very low overall fatality risk.
It also means there must be justice for the millions of people conned, coerced, cajoled, bullied, threatened or otherwise manipulated into submitting to these dangerous and ineffective jabs on false pretences and outright lies. And for those victimised, denigrated and ruined because they were brave enough to speak out and try to warn others.
When subjected to medical intervention, the principle of INORMED CONSENT is a just and rational principle. Indeed it is a crucial human right if we wish to safeguard humanity from mass murder by malicious lunatics.
The public in this instance are being systematically MISinformed with evident malice aforethought and as a result an as yet unknown but certainly unacceptably large number of people are going to suffer illness and death.
DEFINITIONS
What’s the difference between disinform and misinform? Disinform means to intentionally provide or spread false information with the intent to mislead or deceive. Misinform, which is much more commonly used, means to provide someone with false information, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is being done intentionally.
Vaccination Increases Infection Risk by 44%,
Oxford Study Finds
Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44% more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission.
The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8th 2020 to November 17th 2021, meaning it spanned the Alpha and Delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded.
The results for effectiveness against positive Covid test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.
I’ve highlighted in yellow three key figures. The top two show that in the two weeks following the first jab individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for Covid than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is further confirmation of the post-jab spike in infections that has often been noted and which there is evidence is a result of the vaccination temporarily reducing immunity.
The third figure shows that two weeks or more after the second jab – which during 2021 was regarded as ‘fully vaccinated’ – individuals were 44% more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is negative vaccine effectiveness (where infections are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated) of minus-44%. This negative effectiveness is in line with what was seen in the raw data from England at the time and also in studies from other countries, but contradicts the Government’s official estimates, which claimed effectiveness to be 60-85% against Delta infection. The new study indicates that the negative effectiveness was not just a result of confounding factors or a ‘catch-up’ effect, where the vaccinated have lower infection rates initially then higher infection rates as the effect of the vaccine wears off, as some have claimed.
Acknowledging the figures, the authors write: “Surprisingly, we observed a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across all BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the U.K. ONS.” What they don’t mention is that it is fully in line with data from the UKHSA, nor that the ONS is known to overestimate infection rates in the unvaccinated because it underestimates the population – the ONS puts the unvaccinated adult population at 8% whereas the NIMS database puts it at 19% (and surveys higher still at 26%).
The authors state that the “hospital admission and death outcomes were considered more robust outcomes than infection” owing to “variability in testing” and a potentially “high proportion of asymptomatic infections”. The implication is that unvaccinated people were less likely to get tested when infected, suppressing the positive test rate in the unvaccinated. No evidence is provided for this claim, however, nor any attempt made to quantify the possible size of the difference.
The study was published in June but went largely unnoticed until Alex Berenson wrote about it last week. Alex also draws attention to the fact that vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death is much weaker than was claimed at the time.
Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61% (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90-99% claimed by the Government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44% higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61% effectiveness to just 34%.
Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97%, from 61% following the second jab, despite this being before the effect of the booster should kick in. This oddity is not explained.
Looking at the hospitalisation figures, there is a disturbing spike in the weeks following the first jab, hitting over twice as high (2.02) in the second week. Why are the vaccinated up to twice as likely to be hospitalised with Covid than the unvaccinated in the weeks following the jab?
The figures show that having two vaccine doses reduces hospitalisation risk by 66% once 14 days post-injection (though once again there is an unexplained leap in efficacy from 19% 28 days after dose 1 to 67% in the week after dose 2). The 66% is markedly lower than the 90-99% claimed at the time, as shown below in the table from a UKHSA Government report in September 2021.
UKHSA, September 2021
The new figures are much more in line with what was observed in the raw UKHSA data. But it means we’re left without explanation as to why the clinical trials and Government studies showed high efficacy for a two dose course, when observational studies of the real-world evidence now find negative effectiveness against infection and much lower than advertised effectiveness against serious disease. An explanation is clearly required. And given the earlier studies were used to inform both individuals’ choices and public policy, including medical coercion, serious lessons need to be learned.
We are living in interesting times, times that history will record as the, albeit sometimes painful, birth of a new civilisation much greater than the old one that is dying. And WE, my friend are building it. Moreover, it will be a global one, designed and run by and for all the people of this planet’s human community.
Much of what we are witnessing in terms of the last paroxysms of war and upheaval, the cesspit corruption of the globalists and their cronies, the fraudulent cruelties of their child-drugging, brain-damaging control cult, psychiatry, and so forth are the death throes of the old.
The new civilisation will need, among other things a much better economic foundation than the flawed one that is contributing to the decrepitude of the old.
By this I mean its freedom from economic inequities, iniquities and constraints will require a reformation of the less-than-sane money system currently in use. This is a key and crucial reform to an essential foundation and it is that reform that I will attempt to explain here.
This guide below can help you in a survival situation
If society collapses, you can bet that the foods the pioneers ate will become dietary staples
There is a fundamental problem with our economy that means it will continue to malfunction unless and until that flaw is corrected.
The flaw is carefully hidden behind a smoke screen of complexity by those who profit from it. We are not meant to know about or understand it lest its unmasking derail their gravy train. Understanding and rectifying it, however, will open the door to a resurgence of our fortunes almost beyond imagining. So perhaps we should open the door and see what’s beyond it, even though someone has tried to nail it shut and hung a “Do Not Enter” sign on it.
The flaw can be summed up thus:
There is virtually no true money, per the proper definition of money, in circulation!
That it is calledmoney does not make it money any more than putting kerosene in the petrol tank and calling it petrol will make it petrol. Call it petrol all you like, believe that it is petrol all you like but the car still won’t run properly.
And that in a nutshell is the fundamental flaw that underpins the economic trouble we are having, our precipitate decline, instability, relentlessly escalating debt, money scarcity and plummeting standard of living.
It is the reason we ran into severe difficulties that precipitated our joining the EU and it must be corrected if we are ever to make a success of Brexit.
There is no reason on God’s green Earth we cannot flourish and prosper post-Brexit but if we are to do so, the aforementioned problem must be addressed.
This essay is a brief explanation of the flaw and how to fix it, which incidentally applies to virtually any country.
Your Government Does Not Create Money
The basic problem with our economy is that the government does not create money. Most people assume that it does but in fact it long ago handed that privilege – the privilege of creating money – to banking institutions.
Banking institutions create money out of nothing and then enter that new money into circulation by lending it to you and me, business, governments and so forth.
Those loans are made at interest so that every time a sum of money is created and entered into the economy, it does so as a debtandthe debt has interest added.
Take a simplified example: when the bank kindly lends Joe £5000, the number £5000 is entered electronically in his bak account. Joe thinks the money that has appeared in his account came from somewhere. It didn’t. It is simply an electronic “ledger entry” that says “Joe now had £5000” and Joe goes off and spends the money. Thus £5000 was created out of nothing and, by spending it, Joe gets this newly created money into circulation.
But the loan came at (say) 20% interest. So Joe now owes £5000 PLUS £1000 = £6000. Thus £5000 of new money was created and £6000 of new debt was also created.
IN OTHER WORDS, MORE DEBT THAN MONEY IS CREATED.
In this way, over time, our economy has been rigged to run on debt, not money. Let’s go over that again:
What Is Money?
Money is our means of exchange. It is the system of tokens or symbols we use to pass back and forth among ourselves in lieu of actual goods, but confident that at any time we can exchange money for real goods. Being able to exchange it for real goods is what gives it its value.
Who Creates Money?
Someone has to create money. If nobody created it, it would not exist. But who creates it?
People assume that somehow the government creates it but that is not so. It should be so but it isn’t.
Currently banks create it. They simply “print” it, so to speak.
But having been created, how does it get into circulation so that it can be passed around among people?
How do they Get it into Circulation? And what’s the Catch?
The method of getting newly-created money into circulation is that banks, having “printed” it, then lend it to borrowers. The borrowers then take the money loaned to them and spend it. Thus it enters circulation.
But here’s the catch: each time the bank lends out money it has just created, it charges interest. The interest it charges is its profit on “printing” money – in fact, simply creating numbers in computers – out of thin air and lending it.
Thus, each time newly-created money is gotten into circulation by lending it to someone, interest is added and that someone then owes more money than he borrowed. In other words, more debt has been created than money with which to pay the debt back.
Adverse Effects
This produces many adverse effects that give us all a hard time, a few of them are:
There is more debt in existence (far more) than money.
When an economy expands – through increased population or more goods produced and coming onto the market – the money supply, the stock of circulating money, must be increased along with it. But in the current system, if we increase the money supply – through the mechanics of lending – we increase the overall debt by an even greater amount. This is why in periods of economic boom, levels of debt soar.
The existence of money depends upon people, businesses and governments carrying debt. In order for money to exist, someone has to be in debt and they have to carry more debt than they have money.
For one person or group to get out of debt or reduce their debt, someone else must go deeper into debt if the volume of money circulating in the economy is to be maintained.
Money enters the economy through three main channels of borrowing:
borrowing by the consumer,
borrowing by industry,
borrowing by government.
If, for example, a credit squeeze restricts borrowing by the consumer and industry, there is an increased pressure on government to borrow so as to prevent the money supply shrinking (recession.) If government seeks to reduce its own borrowing, the pressure increases upon the consumer and industry to borrow.
A “credit squeeze” or “austerity measures,” in that they seek to reduce borrowing, bring about a decline in the stock of circulating money. Money becomes scarcer. When money is made scarce relative to the amount of goods and services people want to buy with it, we have what is known as recession.
There are a great many aspects to this economic folly, far more than I can cover in this brief article.
Suffice to mention here that where a government has surrendered to private banking cartels the creation and lending into circulation of its money stock, those cartels have the whip hand over it.
By turning on and off the tap of money supply through the mechanics of lending, the banking cartels can control the fortunes of entire industries and nations, engineer booms and depressions, dismantle countries targeted for destruction, foment wars, give advantage to those corporate interests they favour and so on.
Understanding that basic “why” of our trouble enables us to come up with a simple plan for national economic recovery, which will enable us to extricate ourselves from the mire in which we are stuck, turn around our national fortunes and bring about a boom beyond all imagining.
Brexit Without Monetary Reform is Not Enough
It is important to note too that the mere fact of leaving the European Union did not free us from this system and thus did not make us truly free to determine our own fortunes.
It was this system that enabled our decline to be engineered in the first place by those who wanted us desperate enough to embrace the fake Promised Land of European Union. Leaving the EU and reforming our money system are both necessary.
Ability to Produce is not the Problem
Bear in mind that whatever trouble we have, it is rarely an inability to produce in abundance all the food, clothing, furniture, computers, roads, houses, schools and so forth we need. We can potentially, produce any amount of these things and so the potential for material wealth is there.
There is a difference for example between being hungry because the crops won’t grow and being hungry because we don’t have the money to buy crops that either have been grown or can be grown.
Scarce Money
What is scarce in a recession is money and thus our ability to express demand for what we want because money is the thing we use to express our demand. And so businesses go bust due to a “decline in demand”. But it is not people’s desire for industry’s products that has suddenly, inexplicably waned. What has happened is a relative scarcity of money and thus the spending power with which to express demand.
If you haven’t got the money you can’t buy the dishwasher and if you can’t buy the dishwasher, the dishwasher manufacturer can’t sell it and so goes out of business, no matter that the dishwasher exists, nor how much you want the dishwasher and how much he wants to sell it to you!
Thus, as I mentioned, the problem we have is not a technological inability to create wealth but a malfunctioning money system, a corrupted means of exchange, that has brought about problems of the distribution of wealth from producer to consumer. It is quite likely that such problems of the distribution of wealth created led to often catastrophic failed attempts to correct it, such as Communism. They failed because they attempted to address symptoms without ever identifying and correcting the underlying cause.
Delivering Power into Criminal Hands
This system delivers into the hands of the institutions that create money the power to control money supply, to turn on or off the tap of money supply or to direct the supply of money to those they favour or deny money to those they do not favour. Thus they have been given a whip hand over governments, national economies and the fortunes of nations.
Imagine if someone gave you the sole right to create money and then get it into circulation by lending it out at interest to whomsoever you pleased according to your own purposes and desires. You would have unlimited wealth and unlimited power to shape the fortunes of the human community wouldn’t you? The fortunes of the rest of humanity would then depend on whether your inclinations towards your fellows were inimical or benign. And God help humanity if your inclinations were not benign.
Okay, so now we know what is causing us all this needless trouble.
That trouble is not going to magically disappear unless the cause of it is removed.
That cause is being held in place and then hidden from view by those who profit from it and their proxies in government.
How do We Fix It?
But what can we do about it?
It is very likely that we are approaching a collapse of this flawed system with Western nations who have been at the hub of it facing very serious difficulties. Yet all of these troubles can be avoided and indeed a Golden Age of prosperity ushered, in by the implementation of simple and sensible measures and policies. It is worth knowing what can and should be done to handle the situation when the current system implodes.
So we citizens could do ourselves a favour by demanding the following:
1.) Immediately remove from private banking institutions the right to create money. Banks will retain the right to lend money but may only lend money they actually have on deposit and may not create money out of thin air in order to lend it.
2.) Immediately restore to government – and to democratically elected, accountable government – the right to create money according to the economy’s need for money so as to ensure and facilitate the smooth exchange between producers and consumers of goods and services.
3.) Immediately set up an autonomous Agency whose sole right and duty is to calculate the economy’s need for money. Charge that Agency with the duty of correctly calculating money supply. The yardstick by which that correctness is measured is: KEEP THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE CURRENCY STABLE. In other words, the Agency should steer a course between inflation (too much money resulting in a decline in the currency’s spending power) and recession (too little money in circulation). Stability of spending power of the currency is in any case vital for confidence and the ability to plan and predict.
4.) The above mentioned Agency will not have the power to create money. Its sole function will be that of calculating how much new money must be created and then instructing government to create it.
5.) The above Agency must be protected by law from any influence or interference by any person or agencies including government, with stringent penalties for violation of such law and removal from office of any official or politician who violates that law.
6.) The deliberations, calculations and conclusions of that Agency will by law be open to scrutiny by any citizen of the nation and all its councils, conferences, deliberations and meetings will be held publicly in the presence of witnesses or on camera.
5.) Government will be obliged and bound by law to create and spend new money as instructed by the above mentioned Agency. The Agency may only instruct government as to how much money it must create and spend. It may not instruct government as to on what it spends the money.
6.) Government must spend into circulation exactly the amount it is instructed to spend. It may spend it on roads, schools, pensions, subsidies and so forth, whatever it decides to spend it on according to the priorities, policies and the mandate upon which it was elected to office.
7.) Government must spend the aforementioned money into its home economy so as to ensure it enters circulation in the economy. It may not use newly-created money to buy imports, For example, if it wishes to spend £10 billion into circulation by building a new bridge, it must hire indigenous labour and buy indigenous materials from indigenous suppliers where possible. Thus, through the purchase of materials and the payment of wages, new money will enter the economy WITHOUT A DEBT BEHIND IT and will then circulate. Further, this will greatly help the employment and prosperity of indigenous people and businesses.
8.) New money created by government according to the calculations of the fully autonomous money calculation Agency and spent into the economy on things such as roads and schools or simply used, if government so wishes, to reduce the tax burden of the citizen, will enable taxation to be reduced as the creation and expenditure of new money as the economy needs it will become a new, additional source of revenue for government with which to finance its various projects in service of the people. Bear in mind that new money is created so as to finance various projects all the time. But it is currently done through the mechanics of bank lending described above and the benefits of that method accrue to private banking institutions. Under the new system, the benefits will accrue to the people through a reduction in their tax burden.
9.) Government will thus have a new source of revenue: the creation and spending into circulation of new money. If it wishes to increase its revenues without increasing taxation, it will be able to do so by helping the people increase the production of goods and services both in quantity and quality (wealth). The more benign it makes the environment for human enterprise, for the producer and the honest citizen, the more it supports and encourages the citizen in his efforts to create wealth, the more revenue it will have.
10.) Immediately abolish all taxation (income tax, VAT, death duty, stamp duty, road tax, tax on fuel and so forth.) I say again, all existing taxes of any kind. Replace the currently unwieldy and expensive-to-administer tax system (whose complexity has the sole purpose of hiding from the people exactly how much tax they are paying) with a SINGLE PURCHASE TAX.
NOTE: Under the current system in which moneyenters the economy through the mechanics of bank lending, the economy is awash with unprecedented amounts of debt. The interest we are paying on those debts is in essence a toll or rental charge we pay for the privilege of having a means of exchange. In other words, it is as highly oppressive form of disguised TAXATION, the benefits of which accrue to private banking cartels.
11) The levying of a single purchase tax will enable the people to know as they pay it exactly how much they are paying. Whether the level of purchase tax be set at 25% or 10% by government or raised or lowered by government, the people will be able to see it clearly and assess and decide upon the performance of their government in managing the nation’s financial affairs. It will thus be impossible for government to hide taxes or its own incompetence, overspending or economic mis-management. Thus, consumption will be taxed but all production will not be taxed anywhere at any time. All wages and profits will be received free of any tax and the citizen or business will pay his tax as and when he buys goods and services. As tax is paid only when goods are bought, it will be impossible for anyone to evade taxes, either through illegal means or the hiring of creative accountants. The wealthy will naturally pay more tax than those less well off in so far as they buy more goods, more expensive goods and luxury items. Whatever the percentage set for the purchase tax, it will be applied uniformly to all purchases. Moreover, as the system will be simple, requiring only that a percentage be added to purchase prices and only points of sale will be required to present tax accounts, the administrative cost and burden of tax collection will be vastly reduced. The majority of citizens will never need to be involved with tax authorities at all. Those who, being points of sale, are required to deal with tax authorities will find a much greater simplicity than the current system of tax returns.
12.) The spending of new money into the economy to offset the tax burden, coupled with the abolition of all taxation upon income and its replacement with a simple purchase tax will remove from the citizen much of the burden of taxation that has until now so stifled his efforts to prosper.
13.) The abandonment of the system of producing money as debt, with interest on the debt being in effect a toll or tax one pays (to private banks) for the privilege of using the nation’s means of exchange, will also reduce the debt burden and remove further strain from the citizen.
14.) Banks will return to their primary function of safeguarding and investing the money of their savers and the provision of loans for the purchase of large consumer items such as houses. But houses, given the economic measures above, will become relatively cheaper in any case, obviating the need of the citizen to take on a lifetime of debt so as to have a home. Large banking cartels will no longer be able to manipulate the economy and thereby the fortunes of the citizen, through the manipulation of interest rates or strategic lending. The hidden whip hand held by banking cartels over elected governments and entire nations will be removed.
Removing the Debt Burden from Everybody’s Back
It should be noted that while the current system requires escalating levels of borrowing in order to sustain a money supply, the new system will see a vast reduction of the pressure on the citizen.
These measures will remove the debt burden from both citizen and government and enable those who manage their affairs well to be truly solvent. They will also remove the tax burden that penalises production and inhibits enterprise and the hidden influence upon government of the money powers.
There are of course other ills in our society that also need to be corrected and the above measures will not of themselves bring about a Utopia but we can at least remove the distractions of economic constraints and debt slavery from Man’s road and thus make his focus on other essential tasks a little easier.
We are living in interesting times, times that history will record as the, albeit sometimes painful, birth of a new civilisation much greater than the old one that is dying. And WE, my friend are building it. Moreover, it will be a global one, designed and run by and for all the people of this planet’s human community.
Much of what we are witnessing in terms of the last paroxysms of war and upheaval, the cesspit corruption of the globalists and their cronies, the fraudulent cruelties of their child-drugging, brain-damaging control cult, psychiatry, and so forth are the death throes of the old.
The new civilisation will need, among other things a much better economic foundation than the flawed one that is contributing to the decrepitude of the old.
By this I mean its freedom from economic inequities, iniquities and constraints will require a reformation of the less-than-sane money system currently in use. This is a key and crucial reform to an essential foundation and it is that reform that I will attempt to explain here.
The Hidden Economic Flaw
There is a fundamental problem with our economy that means it will continue to malfunction unless and until that flaw is corrected.
The flaw is carefully hidden behind a smoke screen of complexity by those who profit from it. We are not meant to know about or understand it lest its unmasking derail their gravy train. Understanding and rectifying it, however, will open the door to a resurgence of our fortunes almost beyond imagining. So perhaps we should open the door and see what’s beyond it, even though someone has tried to nail it shut and hung a “Do Not Enter” sign on it.
The flaw can be summed up thus:
There is virtually no true money, per the proper definition of money, in circulation!
That it is calledmoney does not make it money any more than putting kerosene in the petrol tank and calling it petrol will make it petrol. Call it petrol all you like, believe that it is petrol all you like but the car still won’t run properly.
And that in a nutshell is the fundamental flaw that underpins the economic trouble we are having, our precipitate decline, instability, relentlessly escalating debt, money scarcity and plummeting standard of living.
It is the reason we ran into severe difficulties that precipitated our joining the EU and it must be corrected if we are ever to make a success of Brexit.
There is no reason on God’s green Earth we cannot flourish and prosper post-Brexit but if we are to do so, the aforementioned problem must be addressed.
This essay is a brief explanation of the flaw and how to fix it, which incidentally applies to virtually any country.
Your Government Does Not Create Money
The basic problem with our economy is that the government does not create money. Most people assume that it does but in fact it long ago handed that privilege – the privilege of creating money – to banking institutions.
Banking institutions create money out of nothing and then enter that new money into circulation by lending it to you and me, business, governments and so forth.
Those loans are made at interest so that every time a sum of money is created and entered into the economy, it does so as a debtandthe debt has interest added.
Take a simplified example: when the bank kindly lends Joe £5000, the number £5000 is entered electronically in his bak account. Joe thinks the money that has appeared in his account came from somewhere. It didn’t. It is simply an electronic “ledger entry” that says “Joe now had £5000” and Joe goes off and spends the money. Thus £5000 was created out of nothing and, by spending it, Joe gets this newly created money into circulation.
But the loan came at (say) 20% interest. So Joe now owes £5000 PLUS £1000 = £6000. Thus £5000 of new money was created and £6000 of new debt was also created.
IN OTHER WORDS, MORE DEBT THAN MONEY IS CREATED.
In this way, over time, our economy has been rigged to run on debt, not money. Let’s go over that again:
What Is Money?
Money is our means of exchange. It is the system of tokens or symbols we use to pass back and forth among ourselves in lieu of actual goods, but confident that at any time we can exchange money for real goods. Being able to exchange it for real goods is what gives it its value.
Who Creates Money?
Someone has to create money. If nobody created it, it would not exist. But who creates it?
People assume that somehow the government creates it but that is not so. It should be so but it isn’t.
Currently banks create it. They simply “print” it, so to speak.
But having been created, how does it get into circulation so that it can be passed around among people?
How do they Get it into Circulation? And what’s the Catch?
The method of getting newly-created money into circulation is that banks, having “printed” it, then lend it to borrowers. The borrowers then take the money loaned to them and spend it. Thus it enters circulation.
But here’s the catch: each time the bank lends out money it has just created, it charges interest. The interest it charges is its profit on “printing” money – in fact, simply creating numbers in computers – out of thin air and lending it.
Thus, each time newly-created money is gotten into circulation by lending it to someone, interest is added and that someone then owes more money than he borrowed. In other words, more debt has been created than money with which to pay the debt back.
Adverse Effects
This produces many adverse effects that give us all a hard time, a few of them are:
There is more debt in existence (far more) than money.
When an economy expands – through increased population or more goods produced and coming onto the market – the money supply, the stock of circulating money, must be increased along with it. But in the current system, if we increase the money supply – through the mechanics of lending – we increase the overall debt by an even greater amount. This is why in periods of economic boom, levels of debt soar.
The existence of money depends upon people, businesses and governments carrying debt. In order for money to exist, someone has to be in debt and they have to carry more debt than they have money.
For one person or group to get out of debt or reduce their debt, someone else must go deeper into debt if the volume of money circulating in the economy is to be maintained.
Money enters the economy through three main channels of borrowing:
borrowing by the consumer,
borrowing by industry,
borrowing by government.
If, for example, a credit squeeze restricts borrowing by the consumer and industry, there is an increased pressure on government to borrow so as to prevent the money supply shrinking (recession.) If government seeks to reduce its own borrowing, the pressure increases upon the consumer and industry to borrow.
A “credit squeeze” or “austerity measures,” in that they seek to reduce borrowing, bring about a decline in the stock of circulating money. Money becomes scarcer. When money is made scarce relative to the amount of goods and services people want to buy with it, we have what is known as recession.
There are a great many aspects to this economic folly, far more than I can cover in this brief article.
The Whip Hand
Suffice to mention here that where a government has surrendered to private banking cartels the creation and lending into circulation of its money stock, those cartels have the whip hand over it.
By turning on and off the tap of money supply through the mechanics of lending, the banking cartels can control the fortunes of entire industries and nations, engineer booms and depressions, dismantle countries targeted for destruction, foment wars, give advantage to those corporate interests they favour and so on.
Understanding that basic “why” of our trouble enables us to come up with a simple plan for national economic recovery, which will enable us to extricate ourselves from the mire in which we are stuck, turn around our national fortunes and bring about a boom beyond all imagining.
Brexit Without Monetary Reform is Not Enough
It is important to note too that the mere fact of leaving the European Union did not free us from this system and thus did not make us truly free to determine our own fortunes.
It was this system that enabled our decline to be engineered in the first place by those who wanted us desperate enough to embrace the fake Promised Land of European Union. Leaving the EU and reforming our money system are both necessary.
Ability to Produce is not the Problem
Bear in mind that whatever trouble we have, it is rarely an inability to produce in abundance all the food, clothing, furniture, computers, roads, houses, schools and so forth we need. We can potentially, produce any amount of these things and so the potential for material wealth is there.
There is a difference for example between being hungry because the crops won’t grow and being hungry because we don’t have the money to buy crops that either have been grown or can be grown.
Scarce Money
What is scarce in a recession is money and thus our ability to express demand for what we want because money is the thing we use to express our demand. And so businesses go bust due to a “decline in demand”. But it is not people’s desire for industry’s products that has suddenly, inexplicably waned. What has happened is a relative scarcity of money and thus the spending power with which to express demand.
If you haven’t got the money you can’t buy the dishwasher and if you can’t buy the dishwasher, the dishwasher manufacturer can’t sell it and so goes out of business, no matter that the dishwasher exists, nor how much you want the dishwasher and how much he wants to sell it to you!
Thus, as I mentioned, the problem we have is not a technological inability to create wealth but a malfunctioning money system, a corrupted means of exchange, that has brought about problems of the distribution of wealth from producer to consumer. It is quite likely that such problems of the distribution of wealth created led to often catastrophic failed attempts to correct it, such as Communism. They failed because they attempted to address symptoms without ever identifying and correcting the underlying cause.
Delivering Power into Criminal Hands
This system delivers into the hands of the institutions that create money the power to control money supply, to turn on or off the tap of money supply or to direct the supply of money to those they favour or deny money to those they do not favour. Thus they have been given a whip hand over governments, national economies and the fortunes of nations.
Imagine if someone gave you the sole right to create money and then get it into circulation by lending it out at interest to whomsoever you pleased according to your own purposes and desires. You would have unlimited wealth and unlimited power to shape the fortunes of the human community wouldn’t you? The fortunes of the rest of humanity would then depend on whether your inclinations towards your fellows were inimical or benign. And God help humanity if your inclinations were not benign.
Okay, so now we know what is causing us all this needless trouble.
That trouble is not going to magically disappear unless the cause of it is removed.
That cause is being held in place and then hidden from view by those who profit from it and their proxies in government.
How do We Fix It?
But what can we do about it?
It is very likely that we are approaching a collapse of this flawed system with Western nations who have been at the hub of it facing very serious difficulties. Yet all of these troubles can be avoided and indeed a Golden Age of prosperity ushered, in by the implementation of simple and sensible measures and policies. It is worth knowing what can and should be done to handle the situation when the current system implodes.
So we citizens could do ourselves a favour by demanding the following:
1.) Immediately remove from private banking institutions the right to create money. Banks will retain the right to lend money but may only lend money they actually have on deposit and may not create money out of thin air in order to lend it.
2.) Immediately restore to government – and to democratically elected, accountable government – the right to create money according to the economy’s need for money so as to ensure and facilitate the smooth exchange between producers and consumers of goods and services.
3.) Immediately set up an autonomous Agency whose sole right and duty is to calculate the economy’s need for money. Charge that Agency with the duty of correctly calculating money supply. The yardstick by which that correctness is measured is: KEEP THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE CURRENCY STABLE. In other words, the Agency should steer a course between inflation (too much money resulting in a decline in the currency’s spending power) and recession (too little money in circulation). Stability of spending power of the currency is in any case vital for confidence and the ability to plan and predict.
4.) The above mentioned Agency will not have the power to create money. Its sole function will be that of calculating how much new money must be created and then instructing government to create it.
5.) The above Agency must be protected by law from any influence or interference by any person or agencies including government, with stringent penalties for violation of such law and removal from office of any official or politician who violates that law.
6.) The deliberations, calculations and conclusions of that Agency will by law be open to scrutiny by any citizen of the nation and all its councils, conferences, deliberations and meetings will be held publicly in the presence of witnesses or on camera.
5.) Government will be obliged and bound by law to create and spend new money as instructed by the above mentioned Agency. The Agency may only instruct government as to how much money it must create and spend. It may not instruct government as to on what it spends the money.
6.) Government must spend into circulation exactly the amount it is instructed to spend. It may spend it on roads, schools, pensions, subsidies and so forth, whatever it decides to spend it on according to the priorities, policies and the mandate upon which it was elected to office.
7.) Government must spend the aforementioned money into its home economy so as to ensure it enters circulation in the economy. It may not use newly-created money to buy imports, For example, if it wishes to spend £10 billion into circulation by building a new bridge, it must hire indigenous labour and buy indigenous materials from indigenous suppliers where possible. Thus, through the purchase of materials and the payment of wages, new money will enter the economy WITHOUT A DEBT BEHIND IT and will then circulate. Further, this will greatly help the employment and prosperity of indigenous people and businesses.
8.) New money created by government according to the calculations of the fully autonomous money calculation Agency and spent into the economy on things such as roads and schools or simply used, if government so wishes, to reduce the tax burden of the citizen, will enable taxation to be reduced as the creation and expenditure of new money as the economy needs it will become a new, additional source of revenue for government with which to finance its various projects in service of the people. Bear in mind that new money is created so as to finance various projects all the time. But it is currently done through the mechanics of bank lending described above and the benefits of that method accrue to private banking institutions. Under the new system, the benefits will accrue to the people through a reduction in their tax burden.
9.) Government will thus have a new source of revenue: the creation and spending into circulation of new money. If it wishes to increase its revenues without increasing taxation, it will be able to do so by helping the people increase the production of goods and services both in quantity and quality (wealth). The more benign it makes the environment for human enterprise, for the producer and the honest citizen, the more it supports and encourages the citizen in his efforts to create wealth, the more revenue it will have.
10.) Immediately abolish all taxation (income tax, VAT, death duty, stamp duty, road tax, tax on fuel and so forth.) I say again, all existing taxes of any kind. Replace the currently unwieldy and expensive-to-administer tax system (whose complexity has the sole purpose of hiding from the people exactly how much tax they are paying) with a SINGLE PURCHASE TAX.
NOTE: Under the current system in which moneyenters the economy through the mechanics of bank lending, the economy is awash with unprecedented amounts of debt. The interest we are paying on those debts is in essence a toll or rental charge we pay for the privilege of having a means of exchange. In other words, it is as highly oppressive form of disguised TAXATION, the benefits of which accrue to private banking cartels.
11) The levying of a single purchase tax will enable the people to know as they pay it exactly how much they are paying. Whether the level of purchase tax be set at 25% or 10% by government or raised or lowered by government, the people will be able to see it clearly and assess and decide upon the performance of their government in managing the nation’s financial affairs. It will thus be impossible for government to hide taxes or its own incompetence, overspending or economic mis-management. Thus, consumption will be taxed but all production will not be taxed anywhere at any time. All wages and profits will be received free of any tax and the citizen or business will pay his tax as and when he buys goods and services. As tax is paid only when goods are bought, it will be impossible for anyone to evade taxes, either through illegal means or the hiring of creative accountants. The wealthy will naturally pay more tax than those less well off in so far as they buy more goods, more expensive goods and luxury items. Whatever the percentage set for the purchase tax, it will be applied uniformly to all purchases. Moreover, as the system will be simple, requiring only that a percentage be added to purchase prices and only points of sale will be required to present tax accounts, the administrative cost and burden of tax collection will be vastly reduced. The majority of citizens will never need to be involved with tax authorities at all. Those who, being points of sale, are required to deal with tax authorities will find a much greater simplicity than the current system of tax returns.
12.) The spending of new money into the economy to offset the tax burden, coupled with the abolition of all taxation upon income and its replacement with a simple purchase tax will remove from the citizen much of the burden of taxation that has until now so stifled his efforts to prosper.
13.) The abandonment of the system of producing money as debt, with interest on the debt being in effect a toll or tax one pays (to private banks) for the privilege of using the nation’s means of exchange, will also reduce the debt burden and remove further strain from the citizen.
14.) Banks will return to their primary function of safeguarding and investing the money of their savers and the provision of loans for the purchase of large consumer items such as houses. But houses, given the economic measures above, will become relatively cheaper in any case, obviating the need of the citizen to take on a lifetime of debt so as to have a home. Large banking cartels will no longer be able to manipulate the economy and thereby the fortunes of the citizen, through the manipulation of interest rates or strategic lending. The hidden whip hand held by banking cartels over elected governments and entire nations will be removed.
Removing the Debt Burden from Everybody’s Back
It should be noted that while the current system requires escalating levels of borrowing in order to sustain a money supply, the new system will see a vast reduction of the pressure on the citizen.
These measures will remove the debt burden from both citizen and government and enable those who manage their affairs well to be truly solvent. They will also remove the tax burden that penalises production and inhibits enterprise and the hidden influence upon government of the money powers.
There are of course other ills in our society that also need to be corrected and the above measures will not of themselves bring about a Utopia but we can at least remove the distractions of economic constraints and debt slavery from Man’s road and thus make his focus on other essential tasks a little easier.
The fake Biden is an embarrassment to what leadership is supposed to be — a reflection of US-led Western decadence and depravity.
Days earlier remarks by the illegitimate White House imposter at the UN General Assembly featured Big Lies and mass deception prepared for him to recite via teleprompter.
His only factual remark was about food insecurity and inflation.
Yet like virtually always when hegemon USA representatives speak, they fail to lay blame where it belongs on all things related harm on humanity domestically and abroad.
In defiance of reality last week, the fake JB ignored the early stages of a collapsing Wall Street-controlled/Fed-created financial bubble — the mother of them all in world history now deflating in plain sight.
And with it, trillions of dollars are evaporating with a diabolical end game in mind, planned by dominant monied interests — digital money replacing paper currencies, the heart of what Great Reset tyranny is all about.
It’s not a pretty picture, the worst of it ahead — the abolition of what little remains of greatly eroded freedoms, the scourge of ruler/serf enslavement replacing what’s too precious to lose.
Along with the horror of what Paul Craig Roberts calls “the dark side of the digital revolution,” the risk of possible direct US war on Russia is greater than ever since the dawn of the nuclear age.
In his Russia-bashing rant on the world stage, the fake JB falsely blamed its leadership for years of made-in-the-USA conflict in central Europe.
Begun by the Obama/Biden regime’s 2014 Kiev coup, endless war continues by US-installed Nazis against millions of Donbass residents.
Russia’s SMO was launched to free them from the scourge of US-orchestrated and directed occupation and state terror unleashed against their people — in compliance with the UN Charter Article 51’s right of self-defense.
On all things related to violating what the fake JB called its “core tenets,” hegemon USA is by far the world’s leading offender — clearly not Russia.
The fake JB’s pre-scripted rant featured beginning-to-end Big Lies and mass deception, truth-telling reality excluded.
Addressing the UN General Assembly on Saturday, Sergey Lavrov’s straight talk filled the chamber with indisputable facts about all things Russia and Ukraine, saying the following:
Years of good faith efforts by Moscow for world peace, stability, and mutual cooperation among nations in compliance with international law were spurned by the US-dominated West.
“We repeatedly proposed over the years to agree on rules for coexistence in Europe based on the principle of equal and indivisible security, approved at the highest level of OSCE documents,” Lavrov explained, adding:
“We made our last proposal to make this principle legally binding in December 2021, to which we received an arrogant refusal” by the self-declared master of the universe.
Following hegemon USA’s 2014 coup, Ukraine was transformed from a nation-state to a US-controlled territorial platform for waging perpetual war on Russia and Donbass.
For the empire of lies and forever wars on invented enemies — together with its Western vassals — “Ukraine is simply expendable material in the fight against Russia,” said Lavrov.
US-dominated “NATO declared our country a direct threat on the path to total US dominance, and named China as a long-term strategic challenge.”
In response to Nazified Ukraine’s admission about Pentagon (and CIA) control over its targets, Lavrov minced no words, stressing:
“What is this if not direct (Biden regime) participation in aiming of deadly weapons and participation in the war?”
On referendums continuing through Sept. 27 in Donbass and Kherson/Zaporozhye Regions on joining Russia, not only are they legitimate according to the UN Charter/universal right of self-determination for everyone everywhere, but puppet Zelensky “advised everyone who feels Russian to ‘go to Russia’ ” last year, Lavrov explained, adding:
“That’s what (they’re doing and) taking their lands, on which their ancestors lived for centuries, with them” — their legal right.
On hegemon USA’s rage for dominating the world community of nations, Lavrov slammed its diabolical aim as follows, saying:
The self-declared master of the universe USA elevated itself almost to the rank of messenger of God on earth, with no obligations, but only ‘sacred’ rights to act with impunity, as it pleases anywhere” at its discretion.
Post-WW II, preemptive US-led NATO wars of aggression were waged against one nonthreatening/nonbelligerent nation after another — causing vast destruction and massacring millions, the highest of high crimes.
On UK and EU regimes selling their sovereignty and souls to a higher power in Washington, they agreed to be “subjugated,” said Lavrov.
In the process, they abandoned the letter and spirit of democracy in favor of “authoritarian, rigid, dictatorial” rule.
Despite forever wars and related ruthlessness to preserve its unipolar moment, it crumbled in favor of today’s multilateral world.
The vast majority of non-Western nations reject imperial dominance in favor of governance “without blackmail and intimidation…without (the twin scourges of) Nazism and neo-colonialism,” Lavrov explained.
Hegemon USA’s unipolar moment no longer exists.
The early stages of multilateralism replaced it.
There’s no going back to what the vast majority of people everywhere reject and will no longer tolerate.
Here’s the situation: some people want your stuff, or they just plain out want to kill you. Whatever the cause of the escalation might be, all you’ve got is a gun lying on the ground next to you. What shooting techniques and tactics would you use and how would you survive a gun fight?
So first, you’ve picked up the gun, pulled out the magazine and checked how many rounds you’ve got spare. This is all while rounds are flying over your head and bouncing off things around you. But they’re not hitting you because you’ve already ducked behind cover to figure out your tactics right?
Let’s just say that if there were a group of people firing at me, my first thought would be to get out of there as quickly as possible, regroup with some gun-savvy would-be John Wick volunteers and come back. One big tip that might help, in a gunfight, 3 on 1 is better than 1 on 3. So work with those odds and round up some friends who would be worthy of a gun fight and are up to scratch with these 14 things to remember to survive a shootout.
1. Have yourself a merry little sidearm pistol
Weapon fires weapon stops. This is a thing they teach to soldiers in initial weapons training. They teach this because guns are not like a weapon in Call of Duty, in a real gun battle they stop. You could fire one shot and the weapon might not automatically reload because you have a chunky piece of metal 5.56 jacket jammed in your ejection port.
Now while any good shooter might pull out the magazine, cock the weapon and give the gun a right old nudge and shake just to free up the jam, you’re not going to do that. In an immediate jam, you are going to sling that weapon (everyone should have a good adjustable sling) and whip out your pistol to keep firing.
You might have seen John Wick make his way through a soiree of larger weapons before working his way down to his pistol range, that’s because when you’re in the heat of a shootout, using your next loaded weapon is quicker than fixing a jammed gun, or doing a magazine change.
Important below:
Today I’d like to share with you a “3-second survival hack” you can use to skyrocket your chances of protecting your loved ones during ANY crisis.
That pistol is your merry little backup present when the first one wasn’t good enough. It is loaded and ready to dump out the 15-30 rounds you might be carrying in your glock magazine.
In this case, you’d probably use this secondary weapon to work your way through a pistol fight while you find cover and get your boomstick back into the game.
For a demonstration on the quick sling of the primary to secondary weapon, we can look no further than to the training given to Keanu Reaves to become John Wick by Taran Tactical for this one:
2. Know where your ejection port is
While we all love the John Wick films and other great shooting movies, those films aren’t always that accurate. Especially when it comes to bullet casings. Every weapon has an ejection port. Out of that comes the bit of bullet that never leaves the barrel of a gun. It’s called a casing and it is damn hot.
The first reason you should know where your ejection port is would be in the case above where your weapon jams up. Most of the time it’s going to be a bullet that hasn’t been struck properly and has not fed into the gun correctly, you will see this stuff up in the ejection port. It is about this time that if you are only carrying one gun, you should know how to fix a weapon jam pretty quick.
The second reason, and one quickly learned by shooting beginners, is that some weapons have ejection ports that can fire hot bullet casings onto your skin causing a nice little bullet tattoo to be burnt into your skin. Generally, the ejection port is on the right side of the weapon, so when your would-be volunteer buddies in the gun fight are on your left you are going to get sprayed with burning hot bullet casings.
What should you do about this? Suck it up. They’re on your side and you’ve got bullets coming at you. But if you’re like this lady with a bullet casing down the top, you’re probably going to be burning.
3. I shoot, you run
If you are not shooting you should be running. Tell your buddies in the gun fight the same thing. Try to synchronize it. If you are retreating, one person shoots while the other runs, repeat this until you are in your abandoned building, bunker hideout.
This works the other way, in the attack. If you have sized the enemy as being reasonable for your capacity and you decide to attack, shoot in their direction while your buddy runs. Let’s hope he is smart enough to figure out he should do the same.
The process of your buddy shooting while you run is called ‘covering’. This is why you hear that great term, covering fire.
This gunfighting technique also referred to as ‘fire and movement’ and if you’ve been in the military you’d cringe just hearing these words as that is a lot of the combat practice in the field which turns to elements in urban training.
When you are making those shots, sure, rounds placed near an enemy’s position is going to keep them pinned behind cover, but make sure you control your breathing, which in turn helps with your aim. The military uses a method called Box Breathing for this. Learn it and use it as it is a great way to de-stress and take control of any given situation.
4. Keep your eyes on three things at the same time
While you are ducking, diving, and firing well-aimed shoots in your gunfight survival, there are three other things (I know, it’s a lot) that you should be paying attention to: the guys shooting at you, your buddy, and possible cover. These three things are the only things you should be looking at. You should be watching where your enemy is, where you last saw them or where they sound like they are shooting from. You should be watching this because when your buddy is moving, this is where you are shooting.
You should be watching your buddy and listening out for his gun. If he is shooting, you move, if you don’t hear any shots from him, that probably means his weapon is jammed or he is just plain useless. In some cases that uselessness can also cause a jam – be warned.
On top of this, you should always be looking for the next place you are going to move to. If you are in a retreat, this is basically putting solid things behind you, if you are attacking, this is stuff in front of you. Always be looking for covering spots. Why? Because the next point is why.
5. I’m up, he sees me, I’m down
This is what you say when you run. As soon as you take your first step you should say to yourself: “I’m up, he sees me, I’m down”. This is enough time to move, and not allow your enemy to take a steady aim and kill you. If you run longer than this, anyone with a sense of aim can take a quick sighting and put some metal your way and possibly land a hit. So don’t let it happen.
When the phrase says ‘down’ this doesn’t just refer to dropping to the ground, it is whatever you deem a safe place to fire from. If it is a wall or over the front of a car, use it as cover and shoot while your buddy moves.
You can see how these guys from Polenar Tactical work in unison to provide covering fire for their buddy running. Eventually, this would get you close enough to the enemy to grenade them, or get closer to get your buddy in a flank.
This phrase is something that is regularly repeated in initial combat training for a lot of the world’s forces. It is taught for the reason which is to keep you alive. But this will fail you if you don’t adhere to the next part, which is once you are down, move for an extra few meters. Why? Next point.
6. Don’t be a rabbit
Ever seen a rabbit in the grass? It bends down to eat, pops its head back up and bends down again. You give your friend a nudge in the arm and say “check out two meters left of that tree, there’s a rabbit”. And before you know it, the rabbit has popped his little head up in the exact same spot. Boom, if you were the rabbit you would be dead. The same will happen in a real gun fight.
In a shootout, if you see someone running you are going to aim at their last seen place and wait until they pop out to shoot them. So with the principle mentioned before, once you leave the visibility of your enemy whether it be behind a car, wall… or whatever, move and crawl a few meters before popping up to shoot. Make sure that movement is lateral to the enemy. Think of it as getting out of the X.
In an urban environment, this can only work so well as you might be behind a car or a single-spaced object with very little crawl distance. Make do with what you can but remember the idea of the rabbit popping up in the same place.
7. Be aggressive and quick
Let’s think about some animals at the top of the food chain. All of the ones that I can think of are aggressive and quick in their attack and you should be too despite whether you are attacking or retreating. Why? When you are covering fire you only have a certain amount of bullets to do so (You are hoping that we picked up a gun with a full mag when we found it at the start).
Taking a gun fight slow and steady will result in getting shot. Bullets move fast and you need to as well. If you are ever unfortuante enough to find yourself in the midst of a real gun fight the number one rule is to be aggressive, confident and quick.
Part of being aggressive is also being on the offensive. When it comes to surviving a gun fight, when you maintain the offensive with your buddy (hopefully more than one) you are overwhelming your enemy with so much precise force that they cannot handle the pressure and start making mistakes and panic. This puts you in control and control is the key to winning.
8. Plan like it’s the last thing you ever do
Yes, it could be the last thing you ever do. Getting shot is no field trip and it can result in a massive loss of blood and death. So what are you going to do? Well, you should already have your answer for that. Plan, plan, plan.
It could be anything from attacking with your buddy up until you can run a flank, or it could be to sit and fire a few shots in the enemy’s direction to probe and find out what sort of guns they have (let’s hope for your sake they don’t have mounted heavy belt-fed weapons). Whatever you do, have a plan and a backup one if that fails.
When it comes to gun fights, there are a huge amount of tactics that can be employed, they all depend largely on the area where you are fighting, such as urban gun fights in buildings, apartments and tight streets, or in the wilderness in forests, jungles or wide open planes. All of these have their setbacks, exposure points, and weaknesses. The only way to win a fight is to think logically and exploit those weaknesses against the other team.
I recently wrote a post about a tactical way of thinking using situational awareness. The theory of the OODA loop was developed by a military tactician and is something you should use to diagnose, dissect and win your gun fight. The OODA loop is explained in-depth in the post on situational awareness but for an overview, it stands for:
Observe your enemy
Orientate how they are acting and what you can do to counter and win that action
Make a Decision on the best course of action to take
Carry out the Action.
The loop then continues back into the observation phase.
9. Be fit for a gunfight
By this, we don’t mean you should start doing pushups in the middle of a two-way range. This is a preparatory thing and is a big part of prepping for when the sh-t hits the fan. Fitness is important in a gun fight for three main reasons:
It keeps you confident with a level-head and tactical thinking mindset
It gets you from point A to B quickly and efficiently
It allows you to make a steady aim after just sprinting for your life
If you are not fit, get started by working with high-impact interval training.
10. Get creative when looking for cover
Cover isn’t just a place to hide, it’s also a place to shoot rounds from to try and land a hit on your enemy as well as to suppress the enemy for your buddy to gain some ground. Part of this involves the flexibility and creativity that many special forces soldiers use in their field office. Chances are your gun fight is going to be in an urban environment which means you are going to have vehicles, houses, fences, garden hedges, windows and anything else at your disposal. Whatever you have got, use it.
Navy SEAL Rich Graham teaches various methods like this at his Tactical Carbine course. While this video was intentionally about muzzle awareness from a concealed position, you can see how he uses the tray of a truck as a covered firing position.
Remember that whichever position you find to fire from, make sure you can build a solid firing position to aim, control your breath and control your weapon so that you can make more accurate shots. These are simple military marksmanship principles and greatly improve your aim ability to end a firefight with a well-placed shot when coupled with breathing exercises taught to soldiers. For those that find they need to take time to line a good shot on the range, there are courses developed online such as the Spec Ops Shooting Course that teaches you how to shoot faster while still maintaining the same accuracy. When it comes down to it, shooting quick, and accurate is the most important shooting technique you can ever master.
11. Bring a knife to a gun fight
You have probably heard something along the lines of “don’t bring a knife to a gunfight”, but that is completely wrong. A knife is a piece of equipment every tactical gun fighter should have on their kit for a number of reasons. One of them is that a knife something you can grab in close combat when everything else fails.
Remember how we said you should have a merry little sidearm? What if you have spent all of that ammunition getting to the enemy and it comes down to a test of strength between the two of you? No, that’s not going to happen. You’ve got a fixed-blade knife ready to use in combat.
What type of knife should you be using? That’s up to you, but as far as cool gear goes, you can’t go past the legendary US Marine Ka-Bar knife.
12. If you are entering a gunfight in a car, shoot, then get out and shoot some more
Cars are bullet magnets, and you are pretty well exposed if you are sitting in it (unless of course, you are in the US President’s Beast), so you are going to need to get out of that thing quickly. But while you are getting out, you could be sprayed with metal.
To leave a car in a gun fight (assuming it has stopped) you should:
Fire some shots at whoever is shooting at you (this will divert their attention from shooting you to ducking)
Open the door and hold it open with your foot (some doors have a kickback)
Lead with your gun out the door aiming at the enemy and fire shots while leaving the car
Position yourself so that the vehicle is in between yourself and the enemy
Here is a demonstration on executing a quick departure from a car under fire from Tactical Rifleman:
13. Don’t forget your chest rig
Okay, so if you are in a gun fight, chances are you were probably looking for one and did not run away at the first sign of a shot. This means you are a hardened individual ready to eat lead, shoot with precision, advance towards an enemy and make them quiver with fear from your dominant fighting skills.
All of this means you probably already have something like a Condor Recon Chest Rig and the sweet sidearm carrier the Condor Tornado Tactical Leg Holster. You are a dangerous gunfighter by the looks of it. And with this gear you can carry more magazines, have the smaller working space between the quick draw of your magazines to the loading port of your rifle and handgun and you can also fasten the previously mentioned US Marine Ka-Bar knife to the molle on the rig.
If you are are anything of a military buff, you have probably heard of the film Lone Survivor, the film adaptation of the amazing story of war hero Marcus Luttrel. The film’s immensely real adaptation of military tactics, weapons drills, and equipment was very real. In saying that, the specialist Rhodesian Recon Vest (RRV) chest rig the character wore in that film is also a very popular option for many military professionals and security workers.
14. Don’t get in one, but if you have to, win.
Remember how we mentioned the OODA loop in Number 8? Well if you can see an opportunity to de-escalate an issue then take it. Peace is a much better approach for all parties than exchanging fast and hot bullets.
If there is a peaceful option to take, then take it. But if there isn’t then god speed.
In writing this article, I also encourage anyone who is interested in weapons, in general, to promote gun safety to anyone you know who is about to touch a weapon otherwise you might end up being injured by one of these unsafe people. While this post might sound light, guns are no joke and are meant to be taken very serious when working with and around them.
I hope you enjoyed this post. Give it a share with the buddies you would expect to back you up in a fight!
The fake Biden is an embarrassment to what leadership is supposed to be — a reflection of US-led Western decadence and depravity.
Days earlier remarks by the illegitimate White House imposter at the UN General Assembly featured Big Lies and mass deception prepared for him to recite via teleprompter.
His only factual remark was about food insecurity and inflation.
Yet like virtually always when hegemon USA representatives speak, they fail to lay blame where it belongs on all things related harm on humanity domestically and abroad.
In defiance of reality last week, the fake JB ignored the early stages of a collapsing Wall Street-controlled/Fed-created financial bubble — the mother of them all in world history now deflating in plain sight.
And with it, trillions of dollars are evaporating with a diabolical end game in mind, planned by dominant monied interests — digital money replacing paper currencies, the heart of what Great Reset tyranny is all about.
It’s not a pretty picture, the worst of it ahead — the abolition of what little remains of greatly eroded freedoms, the scourge of ruler/serf enslavement replacing what’s too precious to lose.
This guide below can help you in a survival situation
If society collapses, you can bet that the foods the pioneers ate will become dietary staples
Along with the horror of what Paul Craig Roberts calls “the dark side of the digital revolution,” the risk of possible direct US war on Russia is greater than ever since the dawn of the nuclear age.
In his Russia-bashing rant on the world stage, the fake JB falsely blamed its leadership for years of made-in-the-USA conflict in central Europe.
Begun by the Obama/Biden regime’s 2014 Kiev coup, endless war continues by US-installed Nazis against millions of Donbass residents.
Russia’s SMO was launched to free them from the scourge of US-orchestrated and directed occupation and state terror unleashed against their people — in compliance with the UN Charter Article 51’s right of self-defense.
On all things related to violating what the fake JB called its “core tenets,” hegemon USA is by far the world’s leading offender — clearly not Russia.
The fake JB’s pre-scripted rant featured beginning-to-end Big Lies and mass deception, truth-telling reality excluded.
Addressing the UN General Assembly on Saturday, Sergey Lavrov’s straight talk filled the chamber with indisputable facts about all things Russia and Ukraine, saying the following:
Years of good faith efforts by Moscow for world peace, stability, and mutual cooperation among nations in compliance with international law were spurned by the US-dominated West.
“We repeatedly proposed over the years to agree on rules for coexistence in Europe based on the principle of equal and indivisible security, approved at the highest level of OSCE documents,” Lavrov explained, adding:
“We made our last proposal to make this principle legally binding in December 2021, to which we received an arrogant refusal” by the self-declared master of the universe.
Following hegemon USA’s 2014 coup, Ukraine was transformed from a nation-state to a US-controlled territorial platform for waging perpetual war on Russia and Donbass.
For the empire of lies and forever wars on invented enemies — together with its Western vassals — “Ukraine is simply expendable material in the fight against Russia,” said Lavrov.
US-dominated “NATO declared our country a direct threat on the path to total US dominance, and named China as a long-term strategic challenge.”
In response to Nazified Ukraine’s admission about Pentagon (and CIA) control over its targets, Lavrov minced no words, stressing:
“What is this if not direct (Biden regime) participation in aiming of deadly weapons and participation in the war?”
On referendums continuing through Sept. 27 in Donbass and Kherson/Zaporozhye Regions on joining Russia, not only are they legitimate according to the UN Charter/universal right of self-determination for everyone everywhere, but puppet Zelensky “advised everyone who feels Russian to ‘go to Russia’ ” last year, Lavrov explained, adding:
“That’s what (they’re doing and) taking their lands, on which their ancestors lived for centuries, with them” — their legal right.
On hegemon USA’s rage for dominating the world community of nations, Lavrov slammed its diabolical aim as follows, saying:
The self-declared master of the universe USA elevated itself almost to the rank of messenger of God on earth, with no obligations, but only ‘sacred’ rights to act with impunity, as it pleases anywhere” at its discretion.
Post-WW II, preemptive US-led NATO wars of aggression were waged against one nonthreatening/nonbelligerent nation after another — causing vast destruction and massacring millions, the highest of high crimes.
On UK and EU regimes selling their sovereignty and souls to a higher power in Washington, they agreed to be “subjugated,” said Lavrov.
In the process, they abandoned the letter and spirit of democracy in favor of “authoritarian, rigid, dictatorial” rule.
Despite forever wars and related ruthlessness to preserve its unipolar moment, it crumbled in favor of today’s multilateral world.
The vast majority of non-Western nations reject imperial dominance in favor of governance “without blackmail and intimidation…without (the twin scourges of) Nazism and neo-colonialism,” Lavrov explained.
Hegemon USA’s unipolar moment no longer exists.
The early stages of multilateralism replaced it.
There’s no going back to what the vast majority of people everywhere reject and will no longer tolerate.
The fake Biden is an embarrassment to what leadership is supposed to be — a reflection of US-led Western decadence and depravity.
Days earlier remarks by the illegitimate White House imposter at the UN General Assembly featured Big Lies and mass deception prepared for him to recite via teleprompter.
His only factual remark was about food insecurity and inflation.
Yet like virtually always when hegemon USA representatives speak, they fail to lay blame where it belongs on all things related harm on humanity domestically and abroad.
In defiance of reality last week, the fake JB ignored the early stages of a collapsing Wall Street-controlled/Fed-created financial bubble — the mother of them all in world history now deflating in plain sight.
And with it, trillions of dollars are evaporating with a diabolical end game in mind, planned by dominant monied interests — digital money replacing paper currencies, the heart of what Great Reset tyranny is all about.
It’s not a pretty picture, the worst of it ahead — the abolition of what little remains of greatly eroded freedoms, the scourge of ruler/serf enslavement replacing what’s too precious to lose.
Along with the horror of what Paul Craig Roberts calls “the dark side of the digital revolution,” the risk of possible direct US war on Russia is greater than ever since the dawn of the nuclear age.
This guide below can help you in a survival situation
If society collapses, you can bet that the foods the pioneers ate will become dietary staples
In his Russia-bashing rant on the world stage, the fake JB falsely blamed its leadership for years of made-in-the-USA conflict in central Europe.
Begun by the Obama/Biden regime’s 2014 Kiev coup, endless war continues by US-installed Nazis against millions of Donbass residents.
Russia’s SMO was launched to free them from the scourge of US-orchestrated and directed occupation and state terror unleashed against their people — in compliance with the UN Charter Article 51’s right of self-defense.
On all things related to violating what the fake JB called its “core tenets,” hegemon USA is by far the world’s leading offender — clearly not Russia.
The fake JB’s pre-scripted rant featured beginning-to-end Big Lies and mass deception, truth-telling reality excluded.
Addressing the UN General Assembly on Saturday, Sergey Lavrov’s straight talk filled the chamber with indisputable facts about all things Russia and Ukraine, saying the following:
Years of good faith efforts by Moscow for world peace, stability, and mutual cooperation among nations in compliance with international law were spurned by the US-dominated West.
“We repeatedly proposed over the years to agree on rules for coexistence in Europe based on the principle of equal and indivisible security, approved at the highest level of OSCE documents,” Lavrov explained, adding:
“We made our last proposal to make this principle legally binding in December 2021, to which we received an arrogant refusal” by the self-declared master of the universe.
Following hegemon USA’s 2014 coup, Ukraine was transformed from a nation-state to a US-controlled territorial platform for waging perpetual war on Russia and Donbass.
For the empire of lies and forever wars on invented enemies — together with its Western vassals — “Ukraine is simply expendable material in the fight against Russia,” said Lavrov.
US-dominated “NATO declared our country a direct threat on the path to total US dominance, and named China as a long-term strategic challenge.”
In response to Nazified Ukraine’s admission about Pentagon (and CIA) control over its targets, Lavrov minced no words, stressing:
“What is this if not direct (Biden regime) participation in aiming of deadly weapons and participation in the war?”
On referendums continuing through Sept. 27 in Donbass and Kherson/Zaporozhye Regions on joining Russia, not only are they legitimate according to the UN Charter/universal right of self-determination for everyone everywhere, but puppet Zelensky “advised everyone who feels Russian to ‘go to Russia’ ” last year, Lavrov explained, adding:
“That’s what (they’re doing and) taking their lands, on which their ancestors lived for centuries, with them” — their legal right.
On hegemon USA’s rage for dominating the world community of nations, Lavrov slammed its diabolical aim as follows, saying:
The self-declared master of the universe USA elevated itself almost to the rank of messenger of God on earth, with no obligations, but only ‘sacred’ rights to act with impunity, as it pleases anywhere” at its discretion.
Post-WW II, preemptive US-led NATO wars of aggression were waged against one nonthreatening/nonbelligerent nation after another — causing vast destruction and massacring millions, the highest of high crimes.
On UK and EU regimes selling their sovereignty and souls to a higher power in Washington, they agreed to be “subjugated,” said Lavrov.
In the process, they abandoned the letter and spirit of democracy in favor of “authoritarian, rigid, dictatorial” rule.
Despite forever wars and related ruthlessness to preserve its unipolar moment, it crumbled in favor of today’s multilateral world.
The vast majority of non-Western nations reject imperial dominance in favor of governance “without blackmail and intimidation…without (the twin scourges of) Nazism and neo-colonialism,” Lavrov explained.
Hegemon USA’s unipolar moment no longer exists.
The early stages of multilateralism replaced it.
There’s no going back to what the vast majority of people everywhere reject and will no longer tolerate.
INTRO: I have spent about 30 years either in or working for the US military with leading edge technology as my main focus. No not medical technology but how you learn, how you research, and how you arrive at assumptions and conclusions is very similar. What we will discuss today pushes the boundaries of what many are willing to believe … But it is all possible and very doable (and more) with the state of today’s bio-medical technology. This is something I personally believe with total confidence due to the massive amount of vaccine research I have burned through over the years … And that scares the hell out of me! So let’s delve into a topic that is broaching more and more peoples mindset. Something scary even for those who are at least somewhat familiar with the topic we plow into.
Proving COVID Vaccines don’t work by Vaccine definition and Red Flags:
Over the last decade I have personally researched and written hundreds of vaccine related articles, and done either by hosting, of guesting, hundreds of podcasts or radio shows on vaccines/vaccinations (most available on this website). This said I am not a novice on the subject. One thing that remained a constant throughout that time frame is the definition of a vaccine.
In order for a pharma product to qualify as a vaccine it must accomplish the following via acquired immunity from the injection:
Keep your body from allowing a specific virus into your body
Thus keep your body from storing said virus
Thus negating any chance of your body transmitting said virus
Today we are living in a global population that is now more heavily vaccinated than at any point in human history, and a vast majority of this is related directly to the COVID vaccines.
Yet today a vast majority of those filling our hospitals and dying from (supposed) COVID are fully vaccinated, with the least likely to die being from the unvaccinated portion of humanity … How is this even possible? First Red Flag
Now we are also aware that the virus is not kept from entering the body, nor is the body prevented from basically storing the virus, even with multiple shots and boosters … Again how is this even possible? Second Red Flag
And finally we are now aware that even though you are fully vaccinated (until you are told you need another booster), you are still capable of transmitting the virus … Once more, how the heck is this possible? Third Red Flag
Will someone please explain to me just how this pharma jab even remotely qualifies as a vaccine, something that facilitated mandated vaccinations across the planet? Fourth Red Flag
To say that mRNA vaccines (NOT) are a recent product, something of about the past 2 years, is wrong and abundant proof of the research ongoing for over a decade exists. So if this is not a new concept, and human reaction to it is something that actually has some history … why are we just finding out about the absolute and massive failures these jabs present to the supposed most deadly global pandemic (bull) in human history? Why would these Pharma companies convince our FDA and CDC to hold back vaccine trial documents containing proof of thousands of dangerous and deadly vaccine side effects for seventy five years from the likes of you and me? Could the wealthiest and most powerful entities on the planet (Big Pharma) be that stupid, or prone to this kind of a massive failure?
QUESTIONS
Why are many hundreds of thousands of Americans dropping dead as a result of a lifesaving Vaccine?
Why are excess deaths skyrocketing in every highly vaccinated country across the globe.
Why are young children suffering or dropping dead from heart issues never seen at this level before?
Why is fertility, due to one mechanism or another, dropping of a cliff globally?
Why are morticians finding massive clots in the bodies of many fully vaccinated corpses?
Why are so many fully vaccinated people suffering heart conditions and sever disabilities globally?
Why are miscarriages, fetal deaths and stillbirths soaring in the vaccinated
Why is this being hidden from all of us as it ramps up out of control?
Why are, Why are, Why are …
What if their true intention has nothing to do with a Faux Plandemic … but they are in fact geared to something totally unrelated … GLOBAL GENOCIDE ???
So … H.G. Wells, move aside because reality now may be far more mind bending than science fiction !!!
At this point I will hold up on my ranting and offer you some blatant reality. What is presented below are just a few of the many videos that take this subject matter to a different level, a level of credibility and fact base. If you believe my above rant to be far beyond the limits of reality, then your opinion may come far closer to alignment once you have given the following videos the time and attention they deserve … Unless your future and that of your children mean little to you … then Carry On …
Ultimate-Survival 