Have you ever wondered what makes a person snap? What causes a normal, quiet, everyday citizen, loving mother, or doting father to lose it all and fight like a caged animal? What can cause a small village to rise up and rebel against an oppressive police force and start killing them? What is the switch that gets flipped that causes a city to pour two million people into the streets, chanting and demanding to be heard by their government?

Lately it feels more and more as though we are on standing on the edge of some yawning precipice peering over the crest into darkness. What is more troubling to me is that we have been down this path before. The sense of unease is almost palpable to me sometimes; it is more evident if you are paying attention. If you are able to eliminate the white noise of the world for a minute; hit the pause button on the playlist of daily life for a while and look around, listen, you may start to recognize that you too are caught up in events that will soon change all our lives.

For several years I have felt an unsettling sense that we need to be prepared, that life is going to throw us a big, fat, greasy curve ball soon and we better not be caught napping. To try and proactively address that warning voice I started planning and taking steps to prepare my family to be able to weather events in the future. I am certainly not alone in this concern as you can easily see by the tremendous growth of the prepper movement. In the spectrum of probable events, there are a lot of potential scenarios. Natural disasters and emergencies occur every day all over the world, but you have to broaden your gaze and look to current events and history as well. One of the things that I think is a valid potential event to consider is a collapse of our way of life which leads to an authoritarian oppressive government.

Are we reaching a tipping point?

We have seen in recent events, by now almost too numerous to mention, the effects of a rising frustration with the way things are. It isn’t necessary to go into all of the individual reasons, but as a society there are more and more outpourings of frustration on a global scale. There are increasingly tightening restrictions against people. There is a manipulation of markets and the economy. There is a great increase in the loss of freedom and there is a more open antagonism and almost outright animosity by Government towards their people.

Governments exist either because they have come to power through force and violence or they have been elected and given power by the people. The force and violence crowd usually have their roots in the military and we like to call them Dictators. There have been a ton of them throughout history; Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Kim Jong iL and now his son, Saddam, Gaddafi, the list goes on and on. Dictators don’t care about the people and usually kill anyone who gets in their way. It is a fact that government has killed more people than any other cause, disease or reason.

The other side of the coin is what is usually called Democracies. I am lumping a lot of governments in here I know, but the democracies are usually elected and formed with the consent of the people with the noble goal of securing rights or protecting the people over whom they govern. Almost without fail however, Democratic Governments eventually do not want to answer to the people and at some point they most certainly will not be told what to do by the people to the point of ignoring the will of the people (for the people’s own good of course). Now these governments that are supposed to secure the liberties of their people are becoming more openly hostile to the same people they have sworn to defend. Funnily enough the democratically elected governments now seem to want to hang on to power with the same methods of force and violence as dictators. How else can you explain arming themselves with ammo, ignoring the constitution, purchasing assault vehicles and preparing to confiscate firearms?

When governments will steal money outright from the citizens in order to pay bills that were not incurred by the people we have a problem. When government spies on its people and uses that information against them punitively we have a problem. When Government uses the force of the military that was supposed to defend the people that was paid for by the people, for the purposes of killing the people, we have a big problem. When someone brings to light crimes by the government and is labeled as the one who is a danger, we have a problem.

The problem is that governments around the world are viewing their people as the problem and there really seems to be only one way throughout history that this is ever rectified. My fear is that we are already set on a course that won’t be changed with laws, great political leaders, or a return to the values of a golden age in time long past.

The Fine Line – The Straw that breaks the camel’s back

The fine line between someone who is a law-abiding citizen and a murderer is one that exists purely in our souls. There is nothing physical that is different from a person who follows the rules and someone who breaks them. The urge to pull the trigger isn’t something you can see and it isn’t a trait to test for, so it must be our own individual sense of right and wrong. Of good and evil.

I know that some will argue that a psychopath is definitely recognizable by character traits and maybe even brainwaves or chemistry. That may be true, but you can be a psychopath (clinically) without ever hurting anyone. By the same token, you can take a life while being perfectly “sane”.

If you hold a knife in your hand, you are just as capable of using that to stab or cut someone as the murderer in the next town, but that thought never enters the mind of an overwhelming majority of people. A baseball bat in your hands can easily be swung with great force connecting it to the back of a skull, but this thought never appears in our heads; that is unless we are forced into a corner. When a person is in desperate fear for their lives, the unspoken rules of right and wrong are broken. The processes that we follow every day are overridden in the cause of rage or self-preservation. What was unthinkable before is now very real, necessary and even righteous with the right circumstances.

When the right buttons are pushed, anyone can lose it. When the fear of dying or of losing someone you love is so overpowering, the “fine line” that has been keeping us sane, law-abiding and good is easily shattered. When this happens, all bets are off.

We as a people, a country are still rather firmly attached on the good side of this line. We have not yet completely been driven to abandon all hope and lash out. We have not yet been so harmed, have not gotten to the point that we have nothing to lose and are ready to lose it, but this may be coming in the future.

The force and violence that is being used now to quell the dissatisfaction of people globally is increasing. The methods to cease the complaining of the rabble has been relatively minor with some exceptions. Tear gas, rubber bullets, mace and batons only work up to a point though. When the time comes that people can no longer abide, there won’t be enough police to stop them using riot control techniques. The military doesn’t have enough people to stop the entire population unless those people peacefully agree to surrender, so what will they do? Do you believe any government will quietly step down and admit that they are obviously not speaking for the people anymore? No. They will resort to more force and violence and people will die. Either that or you have a coup like they had in Egypt and guess who took over to “restore order”? Yep, the Military.

What will be the inevitable response by the authorities?

The Chinese people who started to revolt against the police in their town did so because the authorities were “placing restrictions on their culture, language and religion”. China is no picnic compared to America and we clearly know they have lived through far worse oppression than we have, but this was the straw that broke the camel’s back for them?

The protests which turned into an estimated two million citizens of Brazil had started simply enough with a protest over a rise in the rates of public transportation.

In America, what will be the trigger that causes people to rise up and say we aren’t going to take this anymore and more importantly what will happen when/if we do?

What will happen if we don’t change the path we are on?

There is a quote that has always struck me as very sad and telling from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in his book The Gulag Archipelago. Solzhenitsyn was a Russian who was sentenced to 8 years in a Soviet prison camp for essentially writing things about Stalin that the government didn’t like. During this time in Soviet Russia, to stifle dissent, millions were killed or sent to prison camps. In this passage Solzhenitsyn is talking about regret that everyone felt because they simply went along with this tyranny and didn’t oppose it.

 “AND HOW WE BURNED IN THE CAMPS LATER, THINKING: WHAT WOULD THINGS HAVE BEEN LIKE IF EVERY SECURITY OPERATIVE, WHEN HE WENT OUT AT NIGHT TO MAKE AN ARREST, HAD BEEN UNCERTAIN WHETHER HE WOULD RETURN ALIVE AND HAD TO SAY GOOD-BYE TO HIS FAMILY? OR IF, DURING PERIODS OF MASS ARRESTS, AS FOR EXAMPLE IN LENINGRAD, WHEN THEY ARRESTED A QUARTER OF THE ENTIRE CITY, PEOPLE HAD NOT SIMPLY SAT THERE IN THEIR LAIRS, PALING WITH TERROR AT EVERY BANG OF THE DOWNSTAIRS DOOR AND AT EVERY STEP ON THE STAIRCASE, BUT HAD UNDERSTOOD THEY HAD NOTHING LEFT TO LOSE AND HAD BOLDLY SET UP IN THE DOWNSTAIRS HALL AN AMBUSH OF HALF A DOZEN PEOPLE WITH AXES, HAMMERS, POKERS, OR WHATEVER ELSE WAS AT HAND?… THE ORGANS WOULD VERY QUICKLY HAVE SUFFERED A SHORTAGE OF OFFICERS AND TRANSPORT AND, NOTWITHSTANDING ALL OF STALIN’S THIRST, THE CURSED MACHINE WOULD HAVE GROUND TO A HALT! IF…IF…WE DIDN’T LOVE FREEDOM ENOUGH. AND EVEN MORE – WE HAD NO AWARENESS OF THE REAL SITUATION…. WE PURELY AND SIMPLY DESERVED EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED AFTERWARD.”  – ALEKSANDR SOLZHENITSYN

Will this be our fate too? Will we slowly be conditioned to accept atrocities like this and to be completely defanged so that we can be herded into camps without so much as a whimper as well? That’s crazy you say! Is it? Right now, our government is hunting down someone who simply exposed how they (government) were illegally spying on all of us. Our government is buying arms and stockpiling weapons for use domestically not in some war. Our government has the IRS actively harassing a single political/opposition party. Our government has shown that they will lock down a town and go door to door while making the citizens stay cowered inside. Our government has stated that they can imprison anyone without cause for an indefinite amount of time.

Can you seriously argue that we aren’t headed down the same path as others have in our not too distant past?

This is not a call to armed Revolution, but I do think we should all be very wary of this course we are on and the echos of history. We should not be silent in the face of increasing oppression. We should not simply go along quietly because of the fear that we may get in trouble, or worse that we believe the government is only looking out for our best interests. You only need to look at the people in Poland who quietly went into the Warsaw ghettos. You don’t have to look any further than the Holocaust to see what quietly going along will get you.

This is not a fate that I will be bringing on my family.

“The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant and so devastating, that Civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flushed with victory and stung with injury, stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captives to the judgement of law, is one of the most significant tributes that Power ever paid to reason.”

-Justice Robert Jackson, Nov. 21, 1945

It is often forgotten what sort of a battle occurred after WWII to establish the Nuremberg Trials which gave the world a revolutionary code of law which even today offers many of the remedies to the Gordian Knots blocking our way to a peaceful future. By the end of the war, many European leaders of the allied nations wished to simply put leading Nazis against a wall to face a firing squad and return to “business as usual”.

As I’ve outlined in many recent writings, it was only through the intensive efforts of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, and his leading allies in both the USA and Russia that a different course of action was decided upon and an official international tribunal was sanctioned that generated a total legal paradigm shift in international law that has been too easily taken for granted (due largely to the lack of effect these laws have had on post-WWII practice).

Among those revolutionary reforms included the unprecedented mandate that wars of aggression would henceforth be illegal in the eyes of the law. The tendency for those higher officials carrying out inhuman orders to escape responsibility for their actions or omissions of correct action were deemed insufficient defenses under the higher moral principle of “known or should have known”.

The underlying assumption of these Nuremberg laws are: 1) “might does not make right” despite what generations of Hobbesians and Niescheans have chosen to believe and 2) that every individual is responsible for their decisions based not on the arbitrary standards of whatever degenerate society they live in but rather upon the belief in the intrinsic powers of reason and conscience which all humans have access to and are obliged to guide our actions in life.

Nazi philosophers and crown jurists like Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmidt whose thoughts have penetrated the western zeitgeist over the past 70 years would obviously find such concepts repugnant and deplorable.

The fact that the “free world” has ignored these foundations of international law has not changed the fact that they are still true.

Today, many of those powerful unipolar ideologues who managed the disastrous Cold War and post-Cold War geopolitical environment have attempted to erase the precedents of Nuremburg with such atrocities as Soros’ International Criminal Court, and the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine (R2P) in defense of “humanitarian wars” as seen in Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria in recent years. The disturbing rise of unipolar R2P advocacy rampant among the British ruling class like Lord Mark Malloch Brown, Tony Blair and all of the Obama-era globalists surrounding Biden make Vladimir Putin and Sergey Lavrov’s recent remarks at the 75 Anniversary Moscow conference celebrating the commencement of the Nuremberg Trials that much more important.

Putin and Lavrov Celebrate the 75^th Anniversary of Nuremberg Trials

At this event, Putin reminded the attendees of the importance of the historic tribunals which ran from November 21, 1945 to October – 1946, saying:

“We constantly refer to the lessons of the Nuremberg Trials; we understand their importance for defending the truths of historical memory, for making a well-founded and solid case against deliberate distortions and falsifications of World War II events, especially the shameless and deceitful attempts to rehabilitate and even glorify Nazi criminals and their accessories… It is the duty of the entire international community to safeguard the Nuremberg Trials’ decisions, because they concern the principles that underlie the values of the post-war world order and the norms of international law.”

Putin’s remarks were amplified by Sergey Lavrov who elaborated on the new legal paradigm created at Nuremberg which provides an obvious cure for the rise of WWII revisionism, sanitation of Nazism in Ukraine and beyond as well as the revival of many of the practices that made Nazism a viral threat to mankind.

“The Nuremberg Trials—an example of international criminal justice—proved that justice can be achieved with a professional approach based on broad interstate cooperation, consent and mutual respect. Clearly, the Nuremberg Tribunal’s legacy is not limited to law, but has enormous political, moral and educational value. A strong vaccination against the revival of Nazism in all its forms and manifestations was made 75 years ago. Unfortunately, the immunity to the brown plague that was developed in Nuremberg has seriously worn off in some European countries. Russia will continue to vigorously and consistently oppose any attempts to falsify history, to glorify Nazi criminals and their henchmen, and to oppose the revision of the internationally recognized outcomes of World War II, including the Nuremberg rulings.”

So What Happened at Nuremberg?

Amidst the ashes of WWII, a major battle was waged between those deep state forces that had funded fascism as a “solution to the woes of the great depression” vs those genuine patriots who understood that the very fabric of empire and its associated financial, cultural and legal paradigm had to be destroyed and replaced with a paradigm more befitting human civilization.

Among the leading representative of the patriotic forces loyal to FDR’s anti-colonial vision was a man who has been nearly lost to history named Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954). Jackson would serve as Franklin Roosevelt’s most trusted legal advisor who first made a name for himself working closely with Ferdinand Pecora in prosecuting dozens of high level Wall Street financiers and pro-fascist industrialists who orchestrated the depression of 1929 and the later coup and assassination attempts against FDR in 1933-1934. After proving himself in combat, Jackson arose to become U.S. Solicitor General (1938-1940), Attorney General (1940-41) and leading member of the Supreme Court from 1941 until his death in 1954.

Knowing that the deep state coup that ousted Vice-President Henry Wallace and imposed Anglophile tool Harry Truman onto the USA might destroy the hopes for a post-WWII order of peaceful cooperation as outlined by the United Nations Charter, Judge Jackson took the lead and organized the Nuremberg Tribunals delivering the opening speech on November 21, 1945:

One of the prime motives behind the hearings was the intention to give legal meaning and action to the universal ideals conveyed in the United Nations’ Charter. This charter encapsulated the principles that FDR and Henry Wallace outlined repeatedly in the Four Freedoms. These freedoms asserted that all humankind regardless of race, sex, creed, or nationality would: 1) have the freedom from want, 2) freedom to worship as one’s conscience dictated, 3) freedom from fear, and 4) freedom of speech. If international law could tolerate wars of aggression, or if abdication of responsibility for ones’ criminal deeds could be tolerated on the basis of “I was just following orders”, then the UN Charter could carry little weight indeed.

As Jackson wrote in his Summer 1945 report to the President justifying the creation of the Nuremberg Tribunal:

“We therefore propose to charge that a war of aggression is a crime, and that modern international law has abolished the defense that those who incite or wage it are engaged in legitimate business. Thus, may the forces of law be mobilized on the side of peace.”

During the course of the 11 month proceedings, not only were leading cabinet members, generals, lawyers and other high officials put on trial, but the deepest facets of natural law vs Nietschean “law of the strongest” was investigated with Platonic rigor as laid out in the brilliant award-winning film Judgement at Nuremberg (1960).

Due to the leadership of Justice Jackson, the treatment of INTENTION and conspiracy was made the primary focus in the pursuit of justice and cause of criminal guilt. This was not a popular approach then or today for the simple fact that our world is shaped by many top down forces that want their victims’ minds to be forever trapped in the material bottom up world of deductive/inductive logic where immaterial causal intentions and ideas can never be found. For anyone wishing to pursue this fruitful line of thinking further, I suggest reading Edgar Allan Poe’s Eureka.

When one adopts the view that intentions and conspiracies (i.e.: the effect of intentions + ideas when put into action) ARE NOT a driving force of politics and life, then we forever loose our ability to judge truthfulness in any serious manner. This was the philosophical premise of leading Nazi financier Hjalmar Schacht, whose moral relativism and cold calculating principles of economics directly justified the cheap labor camps that worked millions to death in the German war production effort. This same philosophy again found fertile soil in the post-1971 consumer society that revived the logic of cheap labor production under the age of “cheapest price is the law” globalization.

Quoting Schacht who said “Truth is any story that succeeds”, Justice Jackson quipped “I think you can score many more successes, when you want to lead someone, if you don’t tell them the truth- than if you do tell them the truth”.

Laying out the principled intention of the trial to the American people, Jackson said:

“The common sense of mankind demands that law shall not stop with the punishment of petty crimes by little people. It must also reach men who possess themselves of great power and make deliberate and concerted use of it to set in motion evils which leave no home in the world untouched….

“The case as presented by the United States will be concerned with the brains and authority in back of all the crimes. These defendants were men of a station and rank which does not soil its own hands with blood. They were men who knew how to use lesser folk as tools. We want to reach the planners and designers, the inciters and leaders….

“It is not the purpose in my part of this case to deal with the individual crimes. I am dealing with the common plan or design for crime and will not dwell upon individual offenses. My task is only to show the scale on which these crimes occurred, and to show that these are the men who were in the responsible positions and who conceived the plan and design which renders them answerable, regardless of the fact that the plan was actually executed by others….

“The Charter recognizes that one who has committed criminal acts may not take refuge in superior orders nor in the doctrine that his crimes were acts of state….

“The real complaining party at your bar is Civilization…. The refuge of the defendants can only be their hope that International Law will lag so far behind the moral sense of mankind that conduct which is crime in the moral sense must be regarded as innocent in law. Civilization asks whether law is so laggard as to be utterly helpless to deal with crimes of this magnitude by criminals of this order of importance.”

Today, the world sits once more on the brink of a new world order, and the emergence of a governing system that is shaped entirely on the same social Darwinistic/Nietschean operating system that gave rise to fascism in WWII. The same denial of universal truth that animated the minds of a Schacht, Goebbels, Heidegger or Schmidt has become hegemonic among western academia as well.

Very few statesmen have had the courage and insight to resist this unipolar anti-nation state system, but among those who have we are fortunate to have found the current leader of Russia and his allies who in many ways are playing the same historic role as the one played 75 years earlier by Justice Robert Jackson, Henry Wallace and President Roosevelt. Whether the rest of the world wakes up in time to recognize the superiority of the multipolar alliance over the regressive order of the unipolarists carrying us ominously towards World War 3 remains to be seen.

In response to the announced production cut of two million barrels of oil daily by OPEC+ nations on Wednesday to stabilize prices and maintain them above production costs, a White House statement roared disapproval, saying:

The move will “have the most negative impact on lower-and middle-income countries” — ones hegemon USA and its Western vassals exploit by plundering their resources and immiserating their people.

In response, dominant Biden regime hardliners in cahoots with their congressional co-conspirators will retaliate in their customary heavy-handed ways.

According to the WSJ on Thursday:

“US lawmakers are pushing” legislation to break up OPEC, “charge it in front of the World Trade Organization, or even seize assets its members own in the US.”

According to energy official in the Clinton and Obama regimes, David Goldwyn, Wednesday’s announced production cut “is a declaration of economic and diplomatic war (sic).”

Ignored by Goldwyn, Biden regime officials and likeminded congressional members, wrongheaded US/Western policies bear full responsibility for high energy prices and overall inflation.

The combination of unparalleled money printing madness by the Wall Street controlled Fed, along with unparalleled sanctions war on Russia caused inflation to soar.

The way to greatly reduce it is by ending US/Western war on Russia by hot and other means.

As long as it continues with no end of it in prospect, inflation in the collective West and elsewhere will remain elevated way above optimal levels.

What’s happening economically and financially has nothing to do with Russia’s liberating SMO.

Responsibility lies fully in the US/West.

Having created today’s dismal state, their ruling regimes alone can change things by reversing their self-destructive policies.

Instead according to the Journal, undemocratic Dem Senator Markey intends to introduce Orwellian-named legislation, called the OPEC Accountability Act.

It requires the White House imposter to persuade, pressure, intimidate or bully OPEC member-states to reverse their announced production cut.

If these tactics fail, tougher regime heavy-handed actions will follow — including the initiation of dispute proceedings at the World Trade Organization.

Undemocratic Dems led by Rep. Tom Malinowski proposed legislation to mandate removal of US forces and defense systems from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the Journal reported, adding:

“Saudi Arabia and the UAE’s drastic cut in oil production, despite (the fake) Biden’s overtures to both countries in recent months, is a hostile act against (hegemon USA) and a clear signal that (they’re) sid(ing) with Russia…against (Nazified) Ukraine,” adding: 

“This decision is a turning point in our relationship with our Gulf partners.”

According to undemocratic Dem Senator Chris Murphy:

The move by OPEC+ countries Wednesday calls for “a wholesale re-evaluation of the US alliance with Saudi Arabia” and other Gulf oil-producing countries.

If a turning point in relations between hegemon USA and Gulf oil producing states occurs, it’ll be a major step in the right direction against US/Western war on Russia, other nations free from their control, and humanity overall in their home countries and worldwide.

Further anti-OPEC legislation may include reintroducing the so-called “No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act (NOPEC).”

Introduced earlier but never passed, it calls for the US (in)Justice Department to sue OPEC member states on dubious antitrust grounds — what current US law prohibits.

If NOPEC is enacted, hegemon USA may repeat against OPEC member states what it illegally did to Russia — seizing their assets in the US.

Going this far could irreparably damage relations with their governments.

Along with perpetuating war on Russia by hot and other means, the Biden regime and congressional Dems prioritize efforts to retain control in upcoming November 8, midterms — by election theft similar to how they stole the White House and Senate in 2020.

Citing a Friday meeting between Biden regime officials and Big Oil executives, anti-OPEC hardball tactics weren’t ruled out, the Journal reported.

In response to hostile US rhetoric, Saudi energy minister, Abdulaziz bin Salman, said the following:

“Tell me where is the act of belligerence” by OPEC+ member states.

“We shall act and react to what is happening to the global economy in the most responsible and responsive way.”

The announced production cut is “technical, not political.”

Because of high oil prices this year, Saudi Arabia’s economy is one of the world’s fastest growing ones — at a time when the collective West is fast deteriorating toward what may be protracted Main Street Depression conditions as bad or worse than in the 1930s.

Gun Control is a favorite tactic for many politicians on the left. It allows them to shift the blame from the person, whose worldviews and political party often aligns with theirs, to a simple tool they can ban. With an all Republican everything, you’d think we wouldn’t have to worry, but that’s far from true. These people seemingly always find a way to infiltrate politics and attempt to strip us of our God-given rights. So what do we do? How do we fight back if gun control legislation is proposed or passed?

#1. Learn How To Make Your Own

California is the beacon of cruddy gun control laws in the United States. They’ve gone above and beyond to reclassify your standard semi-automatic rifle into what they call an assault rifle. What we’ve seen is people and companies outsmarting the legislature at every turn. One of the most famous means was building your own gun. Specifically AR 15s. AR 15s are always on the chopping block, but even California couldn’t stop the signal.

With the advent of 80% lowers Californians were able to again build their own rifles within the law. The AR 15 is hardly the only weapon you can build. In fact, an enterprising patriot build can manufacture their own semi-auto Sten gun, Glocks, MAC 10/11s, AK rifles and more. The main issue is going to be acquiring the skills and tools needed to make these weapons. It takes a little mechanical skill and a lot of different tools.

It would be wise to start learning the insides and outsides of guns now. Learn to build them, acquire the tools, and fire up the Youtube machine. Here you’ll find as hard as they try they can’t stop the signal. You can build your own with a little practice, and it’s perfectly legal to do so. You aren’t just building guns, you are learning valuable skills regarding the construction and design of firearms that could be invaluable if things got really bad.

Important below:

Today I’d like to share with you a “3-second survival hack” you can use to skyrocket your chances of protecting your loved ones during ANY crisis.

This technique is so powerful it can give you almost superhuman powers during the ugliest nightmares imaginable….

From natural disasters like earthquakes or tornadoes…

To explosive situations like mass shootings or even nationwide martial law.

And It doesn’t matter if you’re out of shape…

Or have no equipment…

Or even if you’re disabled living in a wheelchair.

This technique has been tested and proven by elite soldiers and real world “miracle” survivors from around the world.

#2. Recognize the Gun Ban Matrix

One fact we’ve seen over and over again with anti-gunners is that they know absolutely nothing about guns. If the power these people had wasn’t so terrifying it would be hilarious. Every time they open their mouths about guns they say something incredibly stupid. They simply target guns that look scary and that’s it. That’s why the gun ban matrix exists. The gun ban matrix is a list of features and guns unlikely to be banned because anti-gunners are idiots and don’t understand firearms.

These are the guns you should consider investing in should sweeping legislation occur. In case the situations getting drastic and confiscation begins things may move too fast for people to react. In that event a neutered gun is better than no gun.

The first guns to go are going to be the traditional targets for anti-gunners, the AK 47s, the AR 15s, the Tavors, and the usual suspects. They may be banned by name, or by the features they share. A good alternative to these semi-auto rifles is the Ruger Mini 14 and Mini 30 series. They can be purchased in not so scary configurations.

Past the Mini 14 and Mini 30, there is the fixed magazine SKS rifle. It’s often left off ban lists, and it’s affordable and common. It’s limited to ten rounds, but with stripper clips, you can reload quite fast with practice.

Past this level we get into manually operated firearms, this includes pump-action shotguns, and lever and bolt action rifles. A good lever action rifle is a rapid firing gun and in the right caliber can hold up to 14 rounds. These guns are highly unlikely to be banned without a full constitutional amendment.

#3. Don’t Give A Single Inch

With the recent Las Vegas shooting there has been an increased interest in banning a firearm accessory known as a bump fire stock. These accessories are rather dumb and useless, and in no way did it make the shooter more lethal. Regardless of how dumb and useless they are there is no reason the firearms community should let them be banned without a fight. With the NRA even saying the ATF should reevaluate bump fire stocks.

This is how gun control starts, with tiny little cuts. We let them take one dumb accessory and next time they’ll push for something else, and they’ll keep pushing. Give them nothing, not a single inch. As gun rights advocates we have to defend what we have and go on the offensive. Fight back and take our God Given rights back.

#4. Push Back and Push Back Hard

If legislation gets passed regarding gun control, and I mean any legislation at all, we have to push back. The vast majority of gun owners are law abiding, tax paying, job having citizens who want nothing more than to live in peace. We all know actual gun control will do absolutely nothing to strip criminals of firearms, just good people who already obey the law.

If gun control happens as law abiding gun owners we have to flood the legislator’s offices with our demands. We have to protest, we have to write letters, we need to march on the capitals. In 2012 the gun community did an amazing job of coming together to resist any form of gun control. We need that same response to every law that passes, heck we need that reaction every gun control law that is even proposed.

We need to push at the local, state and federal level. Work every angle possible. We have to keep supporting companies that agree with our God-given rights, we have to join gun rights organizations of every kind. We literally have to put our money where our mouth is.

#5. Focus on the Small Politics as Much as the Large

It’s easy to forget the importance of local politics when it comes to federal gun control. Local and state politics can make all the difference. We saw Sheriff’s in states across the union step forward and say they would refuse to enforce federal gun control laws in their counties. We saw states and municipalities adopt laws that would act to nullify federal gun control laws.

If we can’t toss the anti-freedom and anti-gun bastards out of federal offices we can at least elect the right people at the local and state level to ensure the laws are useless.

Resist

As American citizens, we owe it to future generations to resist. Resist with every fiber we have. Resist gun control measures with everything we can. We need to prepare for the worst and always ready to resist.

On December 6th President Trump’s words shook the world.

For the first time in over 2000 years, Jerusalem was recognized as the capital of Israel.

Whether he knows it or not, President Trump fulfilled his part in a frightening biblical prophecy exactly as the scriptures predicted.

Only the top church leaders and Bible scholars know the real meaning behind this great and terrible moment, yet no one is saying a thing about it…

So pay chose attention because this video will change your life forever for the good!

Also visit this site with the latest news: www.whatfinger.com

Have you ever wondered what makes a person snap? What causes a normal, quiet, everyday citizen, loving mother, or doting father to lose it all and fight like a caged animal? What can cause a small village to rise up and rebel against an oppressive police force and start killing them? What is the switch that gets flipped that causes a city to pour two million people into the streets, chanting and demanding to be heard by their government?

Lately it feels more and more as though we are on standing on the edge of some yawning precipice peering over the crest into darkness. What is more troubling to me is that we have been down this path before. The sense of unease is almost palpable to me sometimes; it is more evident if you are paying attention. If you are able to eliminate the white noise of the world for a minute; hit the pause button on the playlist of daily life for a while and look around, listen, you may start to recognize that you too are caught up in events that will soon change all our lives.

For several years I have felt an unsettling sense that we need to be prepared, that life is going to throw us a big, fat, greasy curve ball soon and we better not be caught napping. To try and proactively address that warning voice I started planning and taking steps to prepare my family to be able to weather events in the future. I am certainly not alone in this concern as you can easily see by the tremendous growth of the prepper movement. In the spectrum of probable events, there are a lot of potential scenarios. Natural disasters and emergencies occur every day all over the world, but you have to broaden your gaze and look to current events and history as well. One of the things that I think is a valid potential event to consider is a collapse of our way of life which leads to an authoritarian oppressive government.

The most shocking article can be found below.

Liberal’s hidden agenda: more than just your guns…

… the impending collapse of the US food supply system
will steal the food from your kids’ tables…

Watch this video below to find out the great secrets hidden by the government.

Are we reaching a tipping point?

We have seen in recent events, by now almost too numerous to mention, the effects of a rising frustration with the way things are. It isn’t necessary to go into all of the individual reasons, but as a society there are more and more outpourings of frustration on a global scale. There are increasingly tightening restrictions against people. There is a manipulation of markets and the economy. There is a great increase in the loss of freedom and there is a more open antagonism and almost outright animosity by Government towards their people.

Governments exist either because they have come to power through force and violence or they have been elected and given power by the people. The force and violence crowd usually have their roots in the military and we like to call them Dictators. There have been a ton of them throughout history; Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Kim Jong iL and now his son, Saddam, Gaddafi, the list goes on and on. Dictators don’t care about the people and usually kill anyone who gets in their way. It is a fact that government has killed more people than any other cause, disease or reason.

The other side of the coin is what is usually called Democracies. I am lumping a lot of governments in here I know, but the democracies are usually elected and formed with the consent of the people with the noble goal of securing rights or protecting the people over whom they govern. Almost without fail however, Democratic Governments eventually do not want to answer to the people and at some point they most certainly will not be told what to do by the people to the point of ignoring the will of the people (for the people’s own good of course). Now these governments that are supposed to secure the liberties of their people are becoming more openly hostile to the same people they have sworn to defend. Funnily enough the democratically elected governments now seem to want to hang on to power with the same methods of force and violence as dictators. How else can you explain arming themselves with ammo, ignoring the constitution, purchasing assault vehicles and preparing to confiscate firearms?

When governments will steal money outright from the citizens in order to pay bills that were not incurred by the people we have a problem. When government spies on its people and uses that information against them punitively we have a problem. When Government uses the force of the military that was supposed to defend the people that was paid for by the people, for the purposes of killing the people, we have a big problem. When someone brings to light crimes by the government and is labeled as the one who is a danger, we have a problem.

The problem is that governments around the world are viewing their people as the problem and there really seems to be only one way throughout history that this is ever rectified. My fear is that we are already set on a course that won’t be changed with laws, great political leaders, or a return to the values of a golden age in time long past.

The Fine Line – The Straw that breaks the camel’s back

The fine line between someone who is a law-abiding citizen and a murderer is one that exists purely in our souls. There is nothing physical that is different from a person who follows the rules and someone who breaks them. The urge to pull the trigger isn’t something you can see and it isn’t a trait to test for, so it must be our own individual sense of right and wrong. Of good and evil.

I know that some will argue that a psychopath is definitely recognizable by character traits and maybe even brainwaves or chemistry. That may be true, but you can be a psychopath (clinically) without ever hurting anyone. By the same token, you can take a life while being perfectly “sane”.

If you hold a knife in your hand, you are just as capable of using that to stab or cut someone as the murderer in the next town, but that thought never enters the mind of an overwhelming majority of people. A baseball bat in your hands can easily be swung with great force connecting it to the back of a skull, but this thought never appears in our heads; that is unless we are forced into a corner. When a person is in desperate fear for their lives, the unspoken rules of right and wrong are broken. The processes that we follow every day are overridden in the cause of rage or self-preservation. What was unthinkable before is now very real, necessary and even righteous with the right circumstances.

When the right buttons are pushed, anyone can lose it. When the fear of dying or of losing someone you love is so overpowering, the “fine line” that has been keeping us sane, law-abiding and good is easily shattered. When this happens, all bets are off.

We as a people, a country are still rather firmly attached on the good side of this line. We have not yet completely been driven to abandon all hope and lash out. We have not yet been so harmed, have not gotten to the point that we have nothing to lose and are ready to lose it, but this may be coming in the future.

The force and violence that is being used now to quell the dissatisfaction of people globally is increasing. The methods to cease the complaining of the rabble has been relatively minor with some exceptions. Tear gas, rubber bullets, mace and batons only work up to a point though. When the time comes that people can no longer abide, there won’t be enough police to stop them using riot control techniques. The military doesn’t have enough people to stop the entire population unless those people peacefully agree to surrender, so what will they do? Do you believe any government will quietly step down and admit that they are obviously not speaking for the people anymore? No. They will resort to more force and violence and people will die. Either that or you have a coup like they had in Egypt and guess who took over to “restore order”? Yep, the Military.

What will be the inevitable response by the authorities?

The Chinese people who started to revolt against the police in their town did so because the authorities were “placing restrictions on their culture, language and religion”. China is no picnic compared to America and we clearly know they have lived through far worse oppression than we have, but this was the straw that broke the camel’s back for them?

The protests which turned into an estimated two million citizens of Brazil had started simply enough with a protest over a rise in the rates of public transportation.

In America, what will be the trigger that causes people to rise up and say we aren’t going to take this anymore and more importantly what will happen when/if we do?

What will happen if we don’t change the path we are on?

There is a quote that has always struck me as very sad and telling from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in his book The Gulag Archipelago. Solzhenitsyn was a Russian who was sentenced to 8 years in a Soviet prison camp for essentially writing things about Stalin that the government didn’t like. During this time in Soviet Russia, to stifle dissent, millions were killed or sent to prison camps. In this passage Solzhenitsyn is talking about regret that everyone felt because they simply went along with this tyranny and didn’t oppose it.

 “AND HOW WE BURNED IN THE CAMPS LATER, THINKING: WHAT WOULD THINGS HAVE BEEN LIKE IF EVERY SECURITY OPERATIVE, WHEN HE WENT OUT AT NIGHT TO MAKE AN ARREST, HAD BEEN UNCERTAIN WHETHER HE WOULD RETURN ALIVE AND HAD TO SAY GOOD-BYE TO HIS FAMILY? OR IF, DURING PERIODS OF MASS ARRESTS, AS FOR EXAMPLE IN LENINGRAD, WHEN THEY ARRESTED A QUARTER OF THE ENTIRE CITY, PEOPLE HAD NOT SIMPLY SAT THERE IN THEIR LAIRS, PALING WITH TERROR AT EVERY BANG OF THE DOWNSTAIRS DOOR AND AT EVERY STEP ON THE STAIRCASE, BUT HAD UNDERSTOOD THEY HAD NOTHING LEFT TO LOSE AND HAD BOLDLY SET UP IN THE DOWNSTAIRS HALL AN AMBUSH OF HALF A DOZEN PEOPLE WITH AXES, HAMMERS, POKERS, OR WHATEVER ELSE WAS AT HAND?… THE ORGANS WOULD VERY QUICKLY HAVE SUFFERED A SHORTAGE OF OFFICERS AND TRANSPORT AND, NOTWITHSTANDING ALL OF STALIN’S THIRST, THE CURSED MACHINE WOULD HAVE GROUND TO A HALT! IF…IF…WE DIDN’T LOVE FREEDOM ENOUGH. AND EVEN MORE – WE HAD NO AWARENESS OF THE REAL SITUATION…. WE PURELY AND SIMPLY DESERVED EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED AFTERWARD.”  – ALEKSANDR SOLZHENITSYN

Will this be our fate too? Will we slowly be conditioned to accept atrocities like this and to be completely defanged so that we can be herded into camps without so much as a whimper as well? That’s crazy you say! Is it? Right now, our government is hunting down someone who simply exposed how they (government) were illegally spying on all of us. Our government is buying arms and stockpiling weapons for use domestically not in some war. Our government has the IRS actively harassing a single political/opposition party. Our government has shown that they will lock down a town and go door to door while making the citizens stay cowered inside. Our government has stated that they can imprison anyone without cause for an indefinite amount of time.

Can you seriously argue that we aren’t headed down the same path as others have in our not too distant past?

This is not a call to armed Revolution, but I do think we should all be very wary of this course we are on and the echos of history. We should not be silent in the face of increasing oppression. We should not simply go along quietly because of the fear that we may get in trouble, or worse that we believe the government is only looking out for our best interests. You only need to look at the people in Poland who quietly went into the Warsaw ghettos. You don’t have to look any further than the Holocaust to see what quietly going along will get you.

This is not a fate that I will be bringing on my family.

Important Below:

Here’s just a small glimpse of what you’ll find in The Lost SuperFoods:

The US Army’s Forgotten Food Miracle And 126 Superfoods That You Can Store Without Refrigeration for Years

Watch the video below!

Also visit this site with the latest news: www.whatfinger.com

On its back foot on all things Russia and Ukraine, the US-dominated collective West, its MSM press agents and Nazified Kiev persist in defying reality on the ground by falsely pretending otherwise.

According to the neocon infested Institute for the Study of War — a notorious Washington-based propaganda operation publishing state-approved talking points — Kiev regime troops are making “substantial gains (sic).”

Reality on the ground is worlds apart different from the above trash.

And this from AP (fake) News on Tuesday:

The collective West “rejected” accession treaties ratified by Russia’s Parliament — in full compliance with international law, the wire service failed to explain.

And this Russia-bashing fake news by Al Jazeera, saying:

Kiev regime troops “advance(d) in the south and east (sic)” while Russia’s parliament approved accession of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye.

And this WaPo fake news:

Approved accession treaties “violat(ed) international law (sic).”

And this NYT trash in its latest fake news edition:

Russia “d(oes) not know where borders are for new (republics and) regions (sic).”

“Russian forces (are) on the run (sic) across a broad swath of the frontline (sic). 

Regime troops “pressed (their nonexistent) blitz offensive (sic) in the east and made gains in the south (sic).”

The above trash and daily volumes more reflect how the public mind is manipulated throughout the US/West by MSM fake news rubbish — truth and full disclosure banned on key issues.

Last week, CNBC reported a rare kernel of reality about US/Western war on Russia by use of expendable Ukrainian foot soldiers, saying:

The collective West is “running out of weapons to send to Ukraine.”

Ramping up production may take place but it’s no quick fix or simple task.

US merchants of death, mass destruction and human misery produce about 30,000 rounds of 155 millimeter howitzer shells annually.

Ukrainian Nazi and conscript troops expend that volume in about “two weeks,” said CNBC.

According to US National Defense University’s senior military fellow, Dave Des Roches:

“Unless we have new production, which takes months to ramp up, we’re not going to have the ability to supply the Ukrainians.”

And this from the EU’s so-called foreign policy chief, Borrell, saying:

“Military stocks of most (European NATO regimes (have been) depleted in a high proportion.”

Hegemon USA nearly exhausted its supply of 155 howitzers and shells — except for what’s reserved for its own forces.

And this reality check from retired marine corps colonel/senior Center for Strategic and International Studies advisor, Mark Cancian:

“There are a number of systems where the (US war department) reached levels where it’s not willing to provide more of that particular system to Ukraine,” adding:

Hegemon USA “needs to maintain stockpiles to support (its) war plans.” 

“For some munitions, the driving war plan would be a conflict with China over Taiwan or in the South China Sea.”

“For others, particularly ground systems, the driving war plan would be North Korea or Europe.” 

The empire of lies and forever wars is “limited” in how many HIMARS, Javelin and Stinger missiles, as well as M777 howitzers and 155 mm shells it can supply to Ukrainian Nazis and conscript troops.

It takes one to four years to boost weapons production significantly, Cancian stressed.

Last spring, Lockheed Martin spokesman, Jim Taiclet, said the following:

It takes “6, 12 to 18 months” to deliver weapons once “our supply chain (is) ramped up.”

Left unexplained by CNBC and other MSM is how much in the way of arms and equipment supplied to the Kiev regime is destroyed by Russian forces.

In stark contrast, analyst Helmholz Smith explained the following:

Russian videos show “trains carrying heavy equipment west.”

“I’ve seen tanks, Mstas, BM-21s, Iskanders and lots of BMPs.” 

“Nothing suggests that Russia is running out of anything.”

“This suggests preparations for a large-scale Russian Army armored offensive along traditional deep penetration doctrine.”

“The status of four new regions opens the possibility of more forceful actions by the Russian Armed Forces because they are defending the Motherland.”

“There is a good deal of plausible speculation that the 300 thousand man call up may free up soldiers in the rear.”

“If so, the effect of extra troops may be felt sooner than many expect.”

And if a winter campaign follows, Russian forces are well-equipped, trained and experienced in frigid weather fighting.

And this reality check posted by military analyst Andrei Martyanov, an analysis by an individual identified as Larch, saying the following:

“Putin set the goals of the SMO.” 

“The demilitarization of an enormous military, stocked for eight years and restocked feverishly from the bases and warehouses of 30 countries in NATO, is going very well.”

“The Ukies had 750,000 men in trenches and fortified positions and embedded in big cities, shielded by civilians everywhere from Kiev to the smallest settlement in Donbass.”

“Ukraine had a significant air force and stout air defenses with BUKs and S-300s in large numbers.”

“The Russians reduced this order of battle markedly.”

“The navy of Ukraine is gone. It has no functioning naval bases.”

“The Ukie air defenses have been reduced to mobile radars and a few extant S-300s.”

“The most effective air defense they have is the tactic of massing MANPADS and receiving real time alerts from NATO of oncoming Russian jets and helos.”

“This has not stopped the Russian aerospace forces, though it is a hampering defense that has to be recognized as a threat.”

“The Ukie air force is 95% gone, only replenished from NATO with aircraft that stay in the battle for minutes before they are reduced to losses.”

“Over 500,000 Ukies are gone, dead and forever off the battlefield.” 

“Thousands of mercs have been killed or chased off the battlefield.”

“The entire junior officer echelon of Ukraine is gone.”

“US and NATO officers are the tactical commanders, as communications in the battlefield document.”

“American and British voices give the commands. Videos are available as proof.”

“Every strategic offensive launched by Kiev (and NATO command running its military) has been destroyed.”

“The only ground they gained was ceded in order to draw the Ukies into the open or to reposition Russian forces to better lines of defense.”

“The Ukies lost forever Mariupol, Kherson, Melitopol, all of Lugansk, 65% of Donetsk, their access to the sea (except with Russian permission at Odessa), the air space over most of Ukraine, and sovereign control over their utilities and transport systems which exist only as long as the Russians allow.” 

“Ukraine is under its 4th total mobilization.”

“By winter’s end it will have lost another 100,000 of their cannon fodder.”

“Likely, too, they will have lost what they hold in the Donetsk oblast.”

“The Russians have done this while exposing only 15% of their military.” 

“It is clear from signs in Chechnya that (General) Kadyrov could gather 100,000 extra men who want to join  Chechen forces from the Caucuses and other brotherly Muslim lands.”

“There are also ample signs that Syrians and some African fighters want to join Russia in the battle against the hegemon.”

“Another 100,000 foreigners could easily be brought to Ukraine, if needed.”

“Russia has enormous depth of reserves beyond its own manpower potential.”

“What (Russian) generals have done is send steel and explosives to demilitarize Ukraine.” 

“Artillery, bombs, rockets and missiles are fighting the war, saving Russian manpower while decimating Ukie force structure.”

Things are “going very well for the mission Putin set.”

“Ukraine will be destroyed and NATO will have no proxy.”

“NATO will have to send its own manpower.”

“That stage of warfare will fracture the alliance.”

“The US will have to coerce a new proxy force to fight Russia out in the open sectors of Ukraine.”

“They won’t be in fortified positions. And they won’t have civilians as shields.”

“If the US manages to spread war into Poland and Belarus and Moldova, a few hypersonic missiles from Russia will quench the enthusiasm of those NATO countries, and Russia will join with Belarus in an overwhelming punishment of Poles and Baltics.”

“If Kaliningrad is touched, the attackers will lose their capitals and HQs.”

“What the Russian military has not done does not indicate what (it’s very much able to) do.” 

“Strategically, the SMO is very successful.”

“Pulling out of Izyum and Lyman are blips that don’t even factor in the military scheme of things.”

As was expected today, once facts (are revealed), the scale of failure of (so-called Kiev) offensives become clear.”

The above reality check is worlds apart from daily propaganda rubbish by US/Western regimes and their MSM co-conspirators.

A day of reckoning awaits them.

The following featured article discusses how, far from being ineffective, the covadiddlyjabs actually INCREASE your chances of infection and hospitalisation.

An increased risk of Covadoodle infection is hardly worth risking the manifold harms now clearly linked to the jabs, such as heart attacks, cancers, autoimmune diseases, fertility problems and other known side effects, especially as the alleged disease itself, comparable in the vast majority of cases with colds and flu, carries a very low overall fatality risk.

It also means there must be justice for the millions of people conned, coerced, cajoled, bullied, threatened or otherwise manipulated into submitting to these dangerous and ineffective jabs on false pretences and outright lies. And for those victimised, denigrated and ruined because they were brave enough to speak out and try to warn others.

When subjected to medical intervention, the principle of INORMED CONSENT is a just and rational principle. Indeed it is a crucial human right if we wish to safeguard humanity from mass murder by malicious lunatics.

The public in this instance are being systematically MISinformed with evident malice aforethought and as a result an as yet unknown but certainly unacceptably large number of people are going to suffer illness and death.

DEFINITIONS

• What’s the difference between disinform and misinform? Disinform means to intentionally provide or spread false information with the intent to mislead or deceive. Misinform, which is much more commonly used, means to provide someone with false information, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is being done intentionally.

Vaccination Increases Infection Risk by 44%,

Oxford Study Finds

Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44% more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission.

The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8th 2020 to November 17th 2021, meaning it spanned the Alpha and Delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded.

The results for effectiveness against positive Covid test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.

I’ve highlighted in yellow three key figures. The top two show that in the two weeks following the first jab individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for Covid than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is further confirmation of the post-jab spike in infections that has often been noted and which there is evidence is a result of the vaccination temporarily reducing immunity.

The third figure shows that two weeks or more after the second jab – which during 2021 was regarded as ‘fully vaccinated’ – individuals were 44% more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is negative vaccine effectiveness (where infections are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated) of minus-44%. This negative effectiveness is in line with what was seen in the raw data from England at the time and also in studies from other countries, but contradicts the Government’s official estimates, which claimed effectiveness to be 60-85% against Delta infection. The new study indicates that the negative effectiveness was not just a result of confounding factors or a ‘catch-up’ effect, where the vaccinated have lower infection rates initially then higher infection rates as the effect of the vaccine wears off, as some have claimed.

Acknowledging the figures, the authors write: “Surprisingly, we observed a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across all BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the U.K. ONS.” What they don’t mention is that it is fully in line with data from the UKHSA, nor that the ONS is known to overestimate infection rates in the unvaccinated because it underestimates the population – the ONS puts the unvaccinated adult population at 8% whereas the NIMS database puts it at 19% (and surveys higher still at 26%).

The authors state that the “hospital admission and death outcomes were considered more robust outcomes than infection” owing to “variability in testing” and a potentially “high proportion of asymptomatic infections”. The implication is that unvaccinated people were less likely to get tested when infected, suppressing the positive test rate in the unvaccinated. No evidence is provided for this claim, however, nor any attempt made to quantify the possible size of the difference.

The study was published in June but went largely unnoticed until Alex Berenson wrote about it last week. Alex also draws attention to the fact that vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death is much weaker than was claimed at the time.

Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61% (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90-99% claimed by the Government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44% higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61% effectiveness to just 34%.

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97%, from 61% following the second jab, despite this being before the effect of the booster should kick in. This oddity is not explained.

Looking at the hospitalisation figures, there is a disturbing spike in the weeks following the first jab, hitting over twice as high (2.02) in the second week. Why are the vaccinated up to twice as likely to be hospitalised with Covid than the unvaccinated in the weeks following the jab?

The figures show that having two vaccine doses reduces hospitalisation risk by 66% once 14 days post-injection (though once again there is an unexplained leap in efficacy from 19% 28 days after dose 1 to 67% in the week after dose 2). The 66% is markedly lower than the 90-99% claimed at the time, as shown below in the table from a UKHSA Government report in September 2021.

UKHSA, September 2021

The new figures are much more in line with what was observed in the raw UKHSA data. But it means we’re left without explanation as to why the clinical trials and Government studies showed high efficacy for a two dose course, when observational studies of the real-world evidence now find negative effectiveness against infection and much lower than advertised effectiveness against serious disease. An explanation is clearly required. And given the earlier studies were used to inform both individuals’ choices and public policy, including medical coercion, serious lessons need to be learned.

Also visit this site with the latest news: www.whatfinger.com

The following featured article discusses how, far from being ineffective, the covadiddlyjabs actually INCREASE your chances of infection and hospitalisation.

An increased risk of Covadoodle infection is hardly worth risking the manifold harms now clearly linked to the jabs, such as heart attacks, cancers, autoimmune diseases, fertility problems and other known side effects, especially as the alleged disease itself, comparable in the vast majority of cases with colds and flu, carries a very low overall fatality risk.

It also means there must be justice for the millions of people conned, coerced, cajoled, bullied, threatened or otherwise manipulated into submitting to these dangerous and ineffective jabs on false pretences and outright lies. And for those victimised, denigrated and ruined because they were brave enough to speak out and try to warn others.

When subjected to medical intervention, the principle of INORMED CONSENT is a just and rational principle. Indeed it is a crucial human right if we wish to safeguard humanity from mass murder by malicious lunatics.

The public in this instance are being systematically MISinformed with evident malice aforethought and as a result an as yet unknown but certainly unacceptably large number of people are going to suffer illness and death.

DEFINITIONS

• What’s the difference between disinform and misinform? Disinform means to intentionally provide or spread false information with the intent to mislead or deceive. Misinform, which is much more commonly used, means to provide someone with false information, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is being done intentionally.

Vaccination Increases Infection Risk by 44%,

Oxford Study Finds

Two doses of COVID-19 vaccine make you 44% more likely to be infected, a study from Oxford University has found, contradicting the basis of global vaccine policy, which assumes vaccination significantly cuts incidence and transmission.

The study, published in the Lancet, looked at all infections reported in England among adults registered at a medical practice from December 8th 2020 to November 17th 2021, meaning it spanned the Alpha and Delta periods. It used a case-control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness, allowing potential confounding factors such as age, sex and underlying conditions to be controlled for, while individuals with prior infection were excluded.

The results for effectiveness against positive Covid test (i.e., reported infection), which were found buried away in the supplementary appendix, are shown below.

I’ve highlighted in yellow three key figures. The top two show that in the two weeks following the first jab individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for Covid than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is further confirmation of the post-jab spike in infections that has often been noted and which there is evidence is a result of the vaccination temporarily reducing immunity.

The third figure shows that two weeks or more after the second jab – which during 2021 was regarded as ‘fully vaccinated’ – individuals were 44% more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts. This is negative vaccine effectiveness (where infections are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated) of minus-44%. This negative effectiveness is in line with what was seen in the raw data from England at the time and also in studies from other countries, but contradicts the Government’s official estimates, which claimed effectiveness to be 60-85% against Delta infection. The new study indicates that the negative effectiveness was not just a result of confounding factors or a ‘catch-up’ effect, where the vaccinated have lower infection rates initially then higher infection rates as the effect of the vaccine wears off, as some have claimed.

Acknowledging the figures, the authors write: “Surprisingly, we observed a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across all BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the U.K. ONS.” What they don’t mention is that it is fully in line with data from the UKHSA, nor that the ONS is known to overestimate infection rates in the unvaccinated because it underestimates the population – the ONS puts the unvaccinated adult population at 8% whereas the NIMS database puts it at 19% (and surveys higher still at 26%).

The authors state that the “hospital admission and death outcomes were considered more robust outcomes than infection” owing to “variability in testing” and a potentially “high proportion of asymptomatic infections”. The implication is that unvaccinated people were less likely to get tested when infected, suppressing the positive test rate in the unvaccinated. No evidence is provided for this claim, however, nor any attempt made to quantify the possible size of the difference.

The study was published in June but went largely unnoticed until Alex Berenson wrote about it last week. Alex also draws attention to the fact that vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death is much weaker than was claimed at the time.

Vaccine effectiveness against death 14 or more days after the second jab is just 61% (the first highlighted figure), well below the 90-99% claimed by the Government. Note that the overall protection will be even lower owing to the vaccinated being more likely to be infected: the 44% higher infection rate mentioned above would reduce the 61% effectiveness to just 34%.

Oddly, the vaccine effectiveness against death in the week following the third jab (the second highlighted figure) jumps up to 97%, from 61% following the second jab, despite this being before the effect of the booster should kick in. This oddity is not explained.

Looking at the hospitalisation figures, there is a disturbing spike in the weeks following the first jab, hitting over twice as high (2.02) in the second week. Why are the vaccinated up to twice as likely to be hospitalised with Covid than the unvaccinated in the weeks following the jab?

The figures show that having two vaccine doses reduces hospitalisation risk by 66% once 14 days post-injection (though once again there is an unexplained leap in efficacy from 19% 28 days after dose 1 to 67% in the week after dose 2). The 66% is markedly lower than the 90-99% claimed at the time, as shown below in the table from a UKHSA Government report in September 2021.

UKHSA, September 2021

The new figures are much more in line with what was observed in the raw UKHSA data. But it means we’re left without explanation as to why the clinical trials and Government studies showed high efficacy for a two dose course, when observational studies of the real-world evidence now find negative effectiveness against infection and much lower than advertised effectiveness against serious disease. An explanation is clearly required. And given the earlier studies were used to inform both individuals’ choices and public policy, including medical coercion, serious lessons need to be learned.

We are living in interesting times, times that history will record as the, albeit sometimes painful, birth of a new  civilisation much greater than the old one that is dying.  And WE, my friend are building it. Moreover, it will be a global one, designed and run by and for all the people of this planet’s human community.

Much of what we are witnessing in terms of the last paroxysms of war and upheaval, the cesspit corruption of the globalists and their cronies, the fraudulent cruelties of their child-drugging, brain-damaging control cult, psychiatry, and so forth are the death throes of the old.

The new civilisation will need, among other things a much better economic foundation than the flawed one that is contributing to the decrepitude of the old.

By this I mean its freedom from economic inequities, iniquities and constraints will require a reformation of the less-than-sane money system currently in use. This is a key and crucial reform to an essential foundation and it is that reform that I will attempt to explain here.

This guide below can help you in a survival situation

If society collapses, you can bet that the foods the pioneers ate will become dietary staples

The Lost Ways prepares you to deal with worst-case scenarios with the minimum amount of resources just like our forefathers lived their lives, totally independent from electricity, cars, or modern technology.

So pay chose attention because this video will change your life forever for the good!

The Hidden Economic Flaw

There is a fundamental problem with our economy that means it will continue to malfunction unless and until that flaw is corrected.

The flaw is carefully hidden behind a smoke screen of complexity by those who profit from it. We are not meant to know about or understand it lest its unmasking derail their gravy train. Understanding and rectifying it, however, will open the door to a resurgence of our fortunes almost beyond imagining. So perhaps we should open the door and see what’s beyond it, even though someone has tried to nail it shut and hung a “Do Not Enter” sign on it.

The flaw can be summed up thus:

There is virtually no true money, per the proper definition of money, in circulation!

That it is called money does not make it money any more than putting kerosene in the petrol tank and calling it petrol will make it petrol. Call it petrol all you like, believe that it is petrol all you like but the car still won’t run properly.

And that in a nutshell is the fundamental flaw that underpins the economic trouble we are having, our precipitate decline, instability, relentlessly escalating debt, money scarcity and plummeting standard of living.

It is the reason we ran into severe difficulties that precipitated our joining the EU and it must be corrected if we are ever to make a success of Brexit.

There is no reason on God’s green Earth we cannot flourish and prosper post-Brexit but if we are to do so, the aforementioned problem must be addressed.

This essay is a brief explanation of the flaw and how to fix it, which incidentally applies to virtually any country.

Your Government Does Not Create Money

The basic problem with our economy is that the government does not create money. Most people assume that it does but in fact it long ago handed that privilege – the privilege of creating money – to banking institutions.

Banking institutions create money out of nothing and then enter that new money into circulation by lending it to you and me, business, governments and so forth.

Those loans are made at interest so that every time a sum of money is created and entered into the economy, it does so as a debt and the debt has interest added.

Take a simplified example: when the bank kindly lends Joe £5000, the number £5000 is entered electronically in his bak account. Joe thinks the money that has appeared in his account came from somewhere. It didn’t. It is simply an electronic “ledger entry” that says “Joe now had £5000” and Joe goes off and spends the money. Thus £5000 was created out of nothing and, by spending it, Joe gets this newly created money into circulation.

But the loan came at (say) 20% interest. So Joe now owes £5000 PLUS £1000 = £6000. Thus £5000 of new money was created and £6000 of new debt was also created.

IN OTHER WORDS, MORE DEBT THAN MONEY IS CREATED.

In this way, over time, our economy has been rigged to run on debt, not money. Let’s go over that again:

What Is Money?

Money is our means of exchange. It is the system of tokens or symbols we use to pass back and forth among ourselves in lieu of actual goods, but confident that at any time we can exchange money for real goods. Being able to exchange it for real goods is what gives it its value.

Who Creates Money?

Someone has to create money. If nobody created it, it would not exist. But who creates it?

People assume that somehow the government creates it but that is not so. It should be so but it isn’t.

Currently banks create it. They simply “print” it, so to speak.

But having been created, how does it get into circulation so that it can be passed around among people?

How do they Get it into Circulation? And what’s the Catch?

The method of getting newly-created money into circulation is that banks, having “printed” it, then lend it to borrowers. The borrowers then take the money loaned to them and spend it. Thus it enters circulation.

But here’s the catch: each time the bank lends out money it has just created, it charges interest. The interest it charges is its profit on “printing” money – in fact, simply creating numbers in computers – out of thin air and lending it.

Thus, each time newly-created money is gotten into circulation by lending it to someone, interest is added and that someone then owes more money than he borrowed. In other words, more debt has been created than money with which to pay the debt back.

Adverse Effects

This produces many adverse effects that give us all a hard time, a few of them are:

There is more debt in existence (far more) than money.

When an economy expands – through increased population or more goods produced and coming onto the market – the money supply, the stock of circulating money, must be increased along with it. But in the current system, if we increase the money supply – through the mechanics of lending – we increase the overall debt by an even greater amount. This is why in periods of economic boom, levels of debt soar.

The existence of money depends upon people, businesses and governments carrying debt. In order for money to exist, someone has to be in debt and they have to carry more debt than they have money.

For one person or group to get out of debt or reduce their debt, someone else must go deeper into debt if the volume of money circulating in the economy is to be maintained.

Money enters the economy through three main channels of borrowing:

1. borrowing by the consumer,
2. borrowing by industry,
3. borrowing by government.

If, for example, a credit squeeze restricts borrowing by the consumer and industry, there is an increased pressure on government to borrow so as to prevent the money supply shrinking (recession.) If government seeks to reduce its own borrowing, the pressure increases upon the consumer and industry to borrow.

A “credit squeeze” or “austerity measures,” in that they seek to reduce borrowing, bring about a decline in the stock of circulating money. Money becomes scarcer. When money is made scarce relative to the amount of goods and services people want to buy with it, we have what is known as recession.

There are a great many aspects to this economic folly, far more than I can cover in this brief article.

Important Below:

Here’s just a small glimpse of what you’ll find in The Lost SuperFoods:

The US Army’s Forgotten Food Miracle And 126 Superfoods That You Can Store Without Refrigeration for Years

Watch the video below!

The Whip Hand

Suffice to mention here that where a government has surrendered to private banking cartels the creation and lending into circulation of its money stock, those cartels have the whip hand over it.

By turning on and off the tap of money supply through the mechanics of lending, the banking cartels can control the fortunes of entire industries and nations, engineer booms and depressions, dismantle countries targeted for destruction, foment wars, give advantage to those corporate interests they favour and so on.

Understanding that basic “why” of our trouble enables us to come up with a simple plan for national economic recovery, which will enable us to extricate ourselves from the mire in which we are stuck, turn around our national fortunes and bring about a boom beyond all imagining.

Brexit Without Monetary Reform is Not Enough

It is important to note too that the mere fact of leaving the European Union did not free us from this system and thus did not make us truly free to determine our own fortunes.

It was this system that enabled our decline to be engineered in the first place by those who wanted us desperate enough to embrace the fake Promised Land of European Union. Leaving the EU and reforming our money system are both necessary.

Ability to Produce is not the Problem

Bear in mind that whatever trouble we have, it is rarely an inability to produce in abundance all the food, clothing, furniture, computers, roads, houses, schools and so forth we need. We can potentially, produce any amount of these things and so the potential for material wealth is there.

There is a difference for example between being hungry because the crops won’t grow and being hungry because we don’t have the money to buy crops that either have been grown or can be grown.

Scarce Money

What is scarce in a recession is money and thus our ability to express demand for what we want because money is the thing we use to express our demand. And so businesses go bust due to a “decline in demand”. But it is not people’s desire for industry’s products that has suddenly, inexplicably waned. What has happened is a relative scarcity of money and thus the spending power with which to express demand.

If you haven’t got the money you can’t buy the dishwasher and if you can’t buy the dishwasher, the dishwasher manufacturer can’t sell it and so goes out of business, no matter that the dishwasher exists, nor how much you want the dishwasher and how much he wants to sell it to you!

Thus, as I mentioned, the problem we have is not a technological  inability to create wealth but a malfunctioning money system, a corrupted means of exchange, that has brought about problems of the distribution of wealth from producer to consumer. It is quite likely that such problems of the distribution of wealth created led to often catastrophic failed attempts to correct it, such as Communism. They failed because they attempted to address symptoms without ever identifying and correcting the underlying cause.

Delivering Power into Criminal Hands

This system delivers into the hands of the institutions that create money the power to control money supply, to turn on or off the tap of money supply or to direct the supply of money to those they favour or deny money to those they do not favour. Thus they have been given a whip hand over governments, national economies and the fortunes of nations.

Imagine if someone gave you the sole right to create money and then get it into circulation by lending it out at interest to whomsoever you pleased according to your own purposes and desires. You would have unlimited wealth and unlimited power to shape the fortunes of the human community wouldn’t you? The fortunes of the rest of humanity would then depend on whether your inclinations towards your fellows were inimical or benign. And God help humanity if your inclinations were not benign.

Okay, so now we know what is causing us all this needless trouble.

That trouble is not going to magically disappear unless the cause of it is removed.

That cause is being held in place and then hidden from view by those who profit from it and their proxies in government.

How do We Fix It?

But what can we do about it?

It is very likely that we are approaching a collapse of this flawed system with Western nations who have been at the hub of it facing very serious difficulties. Yet all of these troubles can be avoided and indeed a Golden Age of prosperity ushered, in by the implementation of simple and sensible measures and policies. It is worth knowing what can and should be done to handle the situation when the current system implodes.

So we citizens could do ourselves a favour by demanding the following:

1.) Immediately remove from private banking institutions the right to create money. Banks will retain the right to lend money but may only lend money they actually have on deposit and may not create money out of thin air in order to lend it.

2.) Immediately restore to government – and to democratically elected, accountable government – the right to create money according to the economy’s need for money so as to ensure and facilitate the smooth exchange between producers and consumers of goods and services.

3.) Immediately set up an autonomous Agency whose sole right and duty is to calculate the economy’s need for money. Charge that Agency with the duty of correctly calculating money supply. The yardstick by which that correctness is measured is: KEEP THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE CURRENCY STABLE. In other words, the Agency should steer a course between inflation (too much money resulting in a decline in the currency’s spending power) and recession (too little money in circulation). Stability of spending power of the currency is in any case vital for confidence and the ability to plan and predict.

4.) The above mentioned Agency will not have the power to create money. Its sole function will be that of calculating how much new money must be created and then instructing government to create it.

5.) The above Agency must be protected by law from any influence or interference by any person or agencies including government, with stringent penalties for violation of such law and removal from office of any official or politician who violates that law.

6.) The deliberations, calculations and conclusions of that Agency will by law be open to scrutiny by any citizen of the nation and all its councils, conferences, deliberations and meetings will be held publicly in the presence of witnesses or on camera.

5.) Government will be obliged and bound by law to create and spend new money as instructed by the above mentioned Agency. The Agency may only instruct government as to how much money it must create and spend. It may not instruct government as to on what it spends the money.

6.) Government must spend into circulation exactly the amount it is instructed to spend. It may spend it on roads, schools, pensions, subsidies and so forth, whatever it decides to spend it on according to the priorities, policies and the mandate upon which it was elected to office.

7.) Government must spend the aforementioned money into its home economy so as to ensure it enters circulation in the economy. It may not use newly-created money to buy imports, For example, if it wishes to spend £10 billion into circulation by building a new bridge, it must hire indigenous labour and buy indigenous materials from indigenous suppliers where possible. Thus, through the purchase of materials and the payment of wages, new money will enter the economy WITHOUT A DEBT BEHIND IT and will then circulate. Further, this will greatly help the employment and prosperity of indigenous people and businesses.

8.) New money created by government according to the calculations of the fully autonomous money calculation Agency and spent into the economy on things such as roads and schools or simply used, if government so wishes, to reduce the tax burden of the citizen, will enable taxation to be reduced as the creation and expenditure of new money as the economy needs it will become a new, additional source of revenue for government with which to finance its various projects in service of the people. Bear in mind that new money is created so as to finance various projects all the time. But it is currently done through the mechanics of bank lending described above and the benefits of that method accrue to private banking institutions. Under the new system, the benefits will accrue to the people through a reduction in their tax burden.

9.) Government will thus have a new source of revenue: the creation and spending into circulation of new money. If it wishes to increase its revenues without increasing taxation, it will be able to do so by helping the people increase the production of goods and services both in quantity and quality (wealth). The more benign it makes the environment for human enterprise, for the producer and the honest citizen, the more it supports and encourages the citizen in his efforts to create wealth, the more revenue it will have.

10.) Immediately abolish all taxation (income tax, VAT, death duty, stamp duty, road tax, tax on fuel and so forth.) I say again, all existing taxes of any kind. Replace the currently unwieldy and expensive-to-administer tax system (whose complexity has the sole purpose of hiding from the people exactly how much tax they are paying) with a SINGLE PURCHASE TAX.

NOTE: Under the current system in which money enters the economy through the mechanics of bank lending, the economy is awash with unprecedented amounts of debt. The interest we are paying on those debts is in essence a toll or rental charge we pay for the privilege of having a means of exchange. In other words, it is as highly oppressive form of  disguised TAXATION, the benefits of which accrue to private banking cartels.

11) The levying of a single purchase tax will enable the people to know as they pay it exactly how much they are paying. Whether the level of purchase tax be set at 25% or 10% by government or raised or lowered by government, the people will be able to see it clearly and assess and decide upon the performance of their government in managing the nation’s financial affairs. It will thus be impossible for government to hide taxes or its own incompetence, overspending or economic mis-management. Thus, consumption will be taxed but all production will not be taxed anywhere at any time. All wages and profits will be received free of any tax and the citizen or business will pay his tax as and when he buys goods and services. As tax is paid only when goods are bought, it will be impossible for anyone to evade taxes, either through illegal means or the hiring of creative accountants. The wealthy will naturally pay more tax than those less well off in so far as they buy more goods, more expensive goods and luxury items. Whatever the percentage set for the purchase tax, it will be applied uniformly to all purchases. Moreover, as the system will be simple, requiring only that a percentage be added to purchase prices and only points of sale will be required to present tax accounts, the administrative cost and burden of tax collection will be vastly reduced. The majority of citizens will never need to be involved with tax authorities at all. Those who, being points of sale, are required to deal with tax authorities will find a much greater simplicity than the current system of tax returns.

12.) The spending of new money into the economy to offset the tax burden, coupled with the abolition of all taxation upon income and its replacement with a simple purchase tax will remove from the citizen much of the burden of taxation that has until now so stifled his efforts to prosper.

13.) The abandonment of the system of producing money as debt, with interest on the debt being in effect a toll or tax one pays (to private banks) for the privilege of using the nation’s means of exchange, will also reduce the debt burden and remove further strain from the citizen.

14.) Banks will return to their primary function of safeguarding and investing the money of their savers and the provision of loans for the purchase of large consumer items such as houses. But houses, given the economic measures above, will become relatively cheaper in any case, obviating the need of the citizen to take on a lifetime of debt so as to have a home. Large banking cartels will no longer be able to manipulate the economy and thereby the fortunes of the citizen, through the manipulation of interest rates or strategic lending. The hidden whip hand held by banking cartels over elected governments and entire nations will be removed.

Removing the Debt Burden from Everybody’s Back

It should be noted that while the current system requires escalating levels of borrowing in order to sustain a money supply, the new system will see a vast reduction of the pressure on the citizen.

These measures will remove the debt burden from both citizen and government and enable those who manage their affairs well to be truly solvent. They will also remove the tax burden that penalises production and inhibits enterprise and the hidden influence upon government of the money powers.

There are of course other ills in our society that also need to be corrected and the above measures will not of themselves bring about a Utopia but we can at least remove the distractions of economic constraints and debt slavery from Man’s road and thus make his focus on other essential tasks a little easier.

Hope this helps!

Also visit this site with the latest news: www.whatfinger.com

We are living in interesting times, times that history will record as the, albeit sometimes painful, birth of a new  civilisation much greater than the old one that is dying.  And WE, my friend are building it. Moreover, it will be a global one, designed and run by and for all the people of this planet’s human community.

Much of what we are witnessing in terms of the last paroxysms of war and upheaval, the cesspit corruption of the globalists and their cronies, the fraudulent cruelties of their child-drugging, brain-damaging control cult, psychiatry, and so forth are the death throes of the old.

The new civilisation will need, among other things a much better economic foundation than the flawed one that is contributing to the decrepitude of the old.

By this I mean its freedom from economic inequities, iniquities and constraints will require a reformation of the less-than-sane money system currently in use. This is a key and crucial reform to an essential foundation and it is that reform that I will attempt to explain here.

The Hidden Economic Flaw

There is a fundamental problem with our economy that means it will continue to malfunction unless and until that flaw is corrected.

The flaw is carefully hidden behind a smoke screen of complexity by those who profit from it. We are not meant to know about or understand it lest its unmasking derail their gravy train. Understanding and rectifying it, however, will open the door to a resurgence of our fortunes almost beyond imagining. So perhaps we should open the door and see what’s beyond it, even though someone has tried to nail it shut and hung a “Do Not Enter” sign on it.

The flaw can be summed up thus:

There is virtually no true money, per the proper definition of money, in circulation!

That it is called money does not make it money any more than putting kerosene in the petrol tank and calling it petrol will make it petrol. Call it petrol all you like, believe that it is petrol all you like but the car still won’t run properly.

And that in a nutshell is the fundamental flaw that underpins the economic trouble we are having, our precipitate decline, instability, relentlessly escalating debt, money scarcity and plummeting standard of living.

It is the reason we ran into severe difficulties that precipitated our joining the EU and it must be corrected if we are ever to make a success of Brexit.

There is no reason on God’s green Earth we cannot flourish and prosper post-Brexit but if we are to do so, the aforementioned problem must be addressed.

This essay is a brief explanation of the flaw and how to fix it, which incidentally applies to virtually any country.

Your Government Does Not Create Money

The basic problem with our economy is that the government does not create money. Most people assume that it does but in fact it long ago handed that privilege – the privilege of creating money – to banking institutions.

Banking institutions create money out of nothing and then enter that new money into circulation by lending it to you and me, business, governments and so forth.

Those loans are made at interest so that every time a sum of money is created and entered into the economy, it does so as a debt and the debt has interest added.

Take a simplified example: when the bank kindly lends Joe £5000, the number £5000 is entered electronically in his bak account. Joe thinks the money that has appeared in his account came from somewhere. It didn’t. It is simply an electronic “ledger entry” that says “Joe now had £5000” and Joe goes off and spends the money. Thus £5000 was created out of nothing and, by spending it, Joe gets this newly created money into circulation.

But the loan came at (say) 20% interest. So Joe now owes £5000 PLUS £1000 = £6000. Thus £5000 of new money was created and £6000 of new debt was also created.

IN OTHER WORDS, MORE DEBT THAN MONEY IS CREATED.

In this way, over time, our economy has been rigged to run on debt, not money. Let’s go over that again:

What Is Money?

Money is our means of exchange. It is the system of tokens or symbols we use to pass back and forth among ourselves in lieu of actual goods, but confident that at any time we can exchange money for real goods. Being able to exchange it for real goods is what gives it its value.

Who Creates Money?

Someone has to create money. If nobody created it, it would not exist. But who creates it?

People assume that somehow the government creates it but that is not so. It should be so but it isn’t.

Currently banks create it. They simply “print” it, so to speak.

But having been created, how does it get into circulation so that it can be passed around among people?

How do they Get it into Circulation? And what’s the Catch?

The method of getting newly-created money into circulation is that banks, having “printed” it, then lend it to borrowers. The borrowers then take the money loaned to them and spend it. Thus it enters circulation.

But here’s the catch: each time the bank lends out money it has just created, it charges interest. The interest it charges is its profit on “printing” money – in fact, simply creating numbers in computers – out of thin air and lending it.

Thus, each time newly-created money is gotten into circulation by lending it to someone, interest is added and that someone then owes more money than he borrowed. In other words, more debt has been created than money with which to pay the debt back.

Adverse Effects

This produces many adverse effects that give us all a hard time, a few of them are:

There is more debt in existence (far more) than money.

When an economy expands – through increased population or more goods produced and coming onto the market – the money supply, the stock of circulating money, must be increased along with it. But in the current system, if we increase the money supply – through the mechanics of lending – we increase the overall debt by an even greater amount. This is why in periods of economic boom, levels of debt soar.

The existence of money depends upon people, businesses and governments carrying debt. In order for money to exist, someone has to be in debt and they have to carry more debt than they have money.

For one person or group to get out of debt or reduce their debt, someone else must go deeper into debt if the volume of money circulating in the economy is to be maintained.

Money enters the economy through three main channels of borrowing:

1. borrowing by the consumer,
2. borrowing by industry,
3. borrowing by government.

If, for example, a credit squeeze restricts borrowing by the consumer and industry, there is an increased pressure on government to borrow so as to prevent the money supply shrinking (recession.) If government seeks to reduce its own borrowing, the pressure increases upon the consumer and industry to borrow.

A “credit squeeze” or “austerity measures,” in that they seek to reduce borrowing, bring about a decline in the stock of circulating money. Money becomes scarcer. When money is made scarce relative to the amount of goods and services people want to buy with it, we have what is known as recession.

There are a great many aspects to this economic folly, far more than I can cover in this brief article.

The Whip Hand

Suffice to mention here that where a government has surrendered to private banking cartels the creation and lending into circulation of its money stock, those cartels have the whip hand over it.

By turning on and off the tap of money supply through the mechanics of lending, the banking cartels can control the fortunes of entire industries and nations, engineer booms and depressions, dismantle countries targeted for destruction, foment wars, give advantage to those corporate interests they favour and so on.

Understanding that basic “why” of our trouble enables us to come up with a simple plan for national economic recovery, which will enable us to extricate ourselves from the mire in which we are stuck, turn around our national fortunes and bring about a boom beyond all imagining.

Brexit Without Monetary Reform is Not Enough

It is important to note too that the mere fact of leaving the European Union did not free us from this system and thus did not make us truly free to determine our own fortunes.

It was this system that enabled our decline to be engineered in the first place by those who wanted us desperate enough to embrace the fake Promised Land of European Union. Leaving the EU and reforming our money system are both necessary.

Ability to Produce is not the Problem

Bear in mind that whatever trouble we have, it is rarely an inability to produce in abundance all the food, clothing, furniture, computers, roads, houses, schools and so forth we need. We can potentially, produce any amount of these things and so the potential for material wealth is there.

There is a difference for example between being hungry because the crops won’t grow and being hungry because we don’t have the money to buy crops that either have been grown or can be grown.

Scarce Money

What is scarce in a recession is money and thus our ability to express demand for what we want because money is the thing we use to express our demand. And so businesses go bust due to a “decline in demand”. But it is not people’s desire for industry’s products that has suddenly, inexplicably waned. What has happened is a relative scarcity of money and thus the spending power with which to express demand.

If you haven’t got the money you can’t buy the dishwasher and if you can’t buy the dishwasher, the dishwasher manufacturer can’t sell it and so goes out of business, no matter that the dishwasher exists, nor how much you want the dishwasher and how much he wants to sell it to you!

Thus, as I mentioned, the problem we have is not a technological  inability to create wealth but a malfunctioning money system, a corrupted means of exchange, that has brought about problems of the distribution of wealth from producer to consumer. It is quite likely that such problems of the distribution of wealth created led to often catastrophic failed attempts to correct it, such as Communism. They failed because they attempted to address symptoms without ever identifying and correcting the underlying cause.

Delivering Power into Criminal Hands

This system delivers into the hands of the institutions that create money the power to control money supply, to turn on or off the tap of money supply or to direct the supply of money to those they favour or deny money to those they do not favour. Thus they have been given a whip hand over governments, national economies and the fortunes of nations.

Imagine if someone gave you the sole right to create money and then get it into circulation by lending it out at interest to whomsoever you pleased according to your own purposes and desires. You would have unlimited wealth and unlimited power to shape the fortunes of the human community wouldn’t you? The fortunes of the rest of humanity would then depend on whether your inclinations towards your fellows were inimical or benign. And God help humanity if your inclinations were not benign.

Okay, so now we know what is causing us all this needless trouble.

That trouble is not going to magically disappear unless the cause of it is removed.

That cause is being held in place and then hidden from view by those who profit from it and their proxies in government.

How do We Fix It?

But what can we do about it?

It is very likely that we are approaching a collapse of this flawed system with Western nations who have been at the hub of it facing very serious difficulties. Yet all of these troubles can be avoided and indeed a Golden Age of prosperity ushered, in by the implementation of simple and sensible measures and policies. It is worth knowing what can and should be done to handle the situation when the current system implodes.

So we citizens could do ourselves a favour by demanding the following:

1.) Immediately remove from private banking institutions the right to create money. Banks will retain the right to lend money but may only lend money they actually have on deposit and may not create money out of thin air in order to lend it.

2.) Immediately restore to government – and to democratically elected, accountable government – the right to create money according to the economy’s need for money so as to ensure and facilitate the smooth exchange between producers and consumers of goods and services.

3.) Immediately set up an autonomous Agency whose sole right and duty is to calculate the economy’s need for money. Charge that Agency with the duty of correctly calculating money supply. The yardstick by which that correctness is measured is: KEEP THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE CURRENCY STABLE. In other words, the Agency should steer a course between inflation (too much money resulting in a decline in the currency’s spending power) and recession (too little money in circulation). Stability of spending power of the currency is in any case vital for confidence and the ability to plan and predict.

4.) The above mentioned Agency will not have the power to create money. Its sole function will be that of calculating how much new money must be created and then instructing government to create it.

5.) The above Agency must be protected by law from any influence or interference by any person or agencies including government, with stringent penalties for violation of such law and removal from office of any official or politician who violates that law.

6.) The deliberations, calculations and conclusions of that Agency will by law be open to scrutiny by any citizen of the nation and all its councils, conferences, deliberations and meetings will be held publicly in the presence of witnesses or on camera.

5.) Government will be obliged and bound by law to create and spend new money as instructed by the above mentioned Agency. The Agency may only instruct government as to how much money it must create and spend. It may not instruct government as to on what it spends the money.

6.) Government must spend into circulation exactly the amount it is instructed to spend. It may spend it on roads, schools, pensions, subsidies and so forth, whatever it decides to spend it on according to the priorities, policies and the mandate upon which it was elected to office.

7.) Government must spend the aforementioned money into its home economy so as to ensure it enters circulation in the economy. It may not use newly-created money to buy imports, For example, if it wishes to spend £10 billion into circulation by building a new bridge, it must hire indigenous labour and buy indigenous materials from indigenous suppliers where possible. Thus, through the purchase of materials and the payment of wages, new money will enter the economy WITHOUT A DEBT BEHIND IT and will then circulate. Further, this will greatly help the employment and prosperity of indigenous people and businesses.

8.) New money created by government according to the calculations of the fully autonomous money calculation Agency and spent into the economy on things such as roads and schools or simply used, if government so wishes, to reduce the tax burden of the citizen, will enable taxation to be reduced as the creation and expenditure of new money as the economy needs it will become a new, additional source of revenue for government with which to finance its various projects in service of the people. Bear in mind that new money is created so as to finance various projects all the time. But it is currently done through the mechanics of bank lending described above and the benefits of that method accrue to private banking institutions. Under the new system, the benefits will accrue to the people through a reduction in their tax burden.

9.) Government will thus have a new source of revenue: the creation and spending into circulation of new money. If it wishes to increase its revenues without increasing taxation, it will be able to do so by helping the people increase the production of goods and services both in quantity and quality (wealth). The more benign it makes the environment for human enterprise, for the producer and the honest citizen, the more it supports and encourages the citizen in his efforts to create wealth, the more revenue it will have.

10.) Immediately abolish all taxation (income tax, VAT, death duty, stamp duty, road tax, tax on fuel and so forth.) I say again, all existing taxes of any kind. Replace the currently unwieldy and expensive-to-administer tax system (whose complexity has the sole purpose of hiding from the people exactly how much tax they are paying) with a SINGLE PURCHASE TAX.

NOTE: Under the current system in which money enters the economy through the mechanics of bank lending, the economy is awash with unprecedented amounts of debt. The interest we are paying on those debts is in essence a toll or rental charge we pay for the privilege of having a means of exchange. In other words, it is as highly oppressive form of  disguised TAXATION, the benefits of which accrue to private banking cartels.

11) The levying of a single purchase tax will enable the people to know as they pay it exactly how much they are paying. Whether the level of purchase tax be set at 25% or 10% by government or raised or lowered by government, the people will be able to see it clearly and assess and decide upon the performance of their government in managing the nation’s financial affairs. It will thus be impossible for government to hide taxes or its own incompetence, overspending or economic mis-management. Thus, consumption will be taxed but all production will not be taxed anywhere at any time. All wages and profits will be received free of any tax and the citizen or business will pay his tax as and when he buys goods and services. As tax is paid only when goods are bought, it will be impossible for anyone to evade taxes, either through illegal means or the hiring of creative accountants. The wealthy will naturally pay more tax than those less well off in so far as they buy more goods, more expensive goods and luxury items. Whatever the percentage set for the purchase tax, it will be applied uniformly to all purchases. Moreover, as the system will be simple, requiring only that a percentage be added to purchase prices and only points of sale will be required to present tax accounts, the administrative cost and burden of tax collection will be vastly reduced. The majority of citizens will never need to be involved with tax authorities at all. Those who, being points of sale, are required to deal with tax authorities will find a much greater simplicity than the current system of tax returns.

12.) The spending of new money into the economy to offset the tax burden, coupled with the abolition of all taxation upon income and its replacement with a simple purchase tax will remove from the citizen much of the burden of taxation that has until now so stifled his efforts to prosper.

13.) The abandonment of the system of producing money as debt, with interest on the debt being in effect a toll or tax one pays (to private banks) for the privilege of using the nation’s means of exchange, will also reduce the debt burden and remove further strain from the citizen.

14.) Banks will return to their primary function of safeguarding and investing the money of their savers and the provision of loans for the purchase of large consumer items such as houses. But houses, given the economic measures above, will become relatively cheaper in any case, obviating the need of the citizen to take on a lifetime of debt so as to have a home. Large banking cartels will no longer be able to manipulate the economy and thereby the fortunes of the citizen, through the manipulation of interest rates or strategic lending. The hidden whip hand held by banking cartels over elected governments and entire nations will be removed.

Removing the Debt Burden from Everybody’s Back

It should be noted that while the current system requires escalating levels of borrowing in order to sustain a money supply, the new system will see a vast reduction of the pressure on the citizen.

These measures will remove the debt burden from both citizen and government and enable those who manage their affairs well to be truly solvent. They will also remove the tax burden that penalises production and inhibits enterprise and the hidden influence upon government of the money powers.

There are of course other ills in our society that also need to be corrected and the above measures will not of themselves bring about a Utopia but we can at least remove the distractions of economic constraints and debt slavery from Man’s road and thus make his focus on other essential tasks a little easier.

Hope this helps!